RESEARCH PROJECTS PROPOSAL TO BE TAKEN UP FOR ESTABLISHING HOMEOPATHY AS A SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL SYSTEM- SUBMITTED BY CHANDRAN NAMBIAR K C, AUTHOR OF THE BOOK ‘REDEFINING HOMEOPATHY’:

RESEARCH PROJECTS PROPOSAL TO BE TAKEN UP FOR ESTABLISHING HOMEOPATHY AS A SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL SYSTEM- SUBMITTED BY CHANDRAN NAMBIAR K C, AUTHOR OF THE BOOK ‘REDEFINING HOMEOPATHY’:

If in order to establish MIT hypothesis regarding homeopathy is correct and scientifically viable, we should first of all be capable of proving through random controlled trials that post-avogadro diluted homeopathic drugs can produce therapeutic effects. Then only any further studies about homeopathy drugs become relevant. When attempting such a trial, we should realize that conventional types of disease-specific and drug specific RCTs cannot be convincingly and successfully done using the individual-specific drug selection approach of classical homeopathy, and as such, we should conduct RCTs using disease-specific combinations of multiple homeopathy drugs in 30c potency.

If MIT hypothesis of homeopathy is correct, we should be capable of proving through in-vitro experiments that post-avogadro diluted homeopathic drugs can interfere in the interactions between biological molecules and specific pathogenic molecules, where as ordinary unpotentized water-alcohol mixture cannot produce such an action.

IN VITRO studies should also prove that potentized homeopathy drugs have no any effect upon biological samples in the abscence of appropriate pathogenic molecules that inhibit the specific biological molecules.

If MIT concept of homeopathy is correct, chemical analysis should prove that the chemical constitution of post-avogadro diluted homeopathy drugs are not any way different from ordinary unmedicated or unpotentized water-alcohol mixture.

If MIT hypothesis is correct, it should be proved through experiments that the molecular forms of original drug substances are not present in their genuine post-avogadro diluted homeopathic forms.

If MIT hypothesis of homeopathy is correct, we should be capable of proving by in- vitro studies that post-avogadro diluted homeopathy drugs cannot interfere or prevent the normal interactions between biological molecules and their natural ligands.

If MIT hypothesis is correct, it should be possible through in vitro studies that post-avogadro homeopathy drugs can antidote the biological effects of crude or molecular forms of same drugs.

If MIT hypothesis of homeopathy is correct, it should be possible to prove that post-avogadro diluted homeopathy differ from unpotentized water-alcohol mixture regarding their physical behaviours such as evaporation rate, surface tension, viscosity, freezing points, boiling points, brownian motion, refraction of light etc.

If MIT hypothesis of homeopathy is correct, spectroscopic studies should prove post-avogadro diluted homeopathy drugs differ from unpotentized water-alcohol mixture regarding their supra-molecular arrangements.

If MIT hypothesis of homeopathy is correct, studies should prove that supra-molecular arrangements of post-avogadro diluted homeopathy could be changed to that of ordinary unpotentized water-alcohol mixture by subjecting to strong heat, electric currents or other forms of electromagnetic energy, and their specific therapeutic properties are lost.

Outcomes and conclusions we arrive at from these studies detailed above will certainly help us in proving whether MIT hypothesis regarding homeopathy is scientifically right or not.

Since these studies are of much importance for existence and further advancement of homeopathy, homeopathy community as well as research Institutions need to dedicate and mobilise a lot of institutional, financial, technical, administrative and human resources, for executing such a gigantic project in a perfect way.