REDEFINING HOMEOPATHY

Tag: dialectical homeopathy

  • MIT HOMEOPATHY APPROACH TO CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE

    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a prevalent, preventable, and treatable disease characterised by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation due to airway and/or alveolar abnormalities, typically caused by significant exposure to noxious particles or gases. The complexity of COPD, which encompasses emphysema and chronic bronchitis, demands a comprehensive understanding to effectively manage and mitigate its impact on individuals and healthcare systems globally. This article endeavours to present a systematic overview of COPD, covering its pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnosis, management, prevention strategies, as well as scope of MIT Homeopathy approach to its therapeutics.

    COPD is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, affecting millions of individuals and posing significant challenges to public health systems. The disease’s hallmark, persistent airflow limitation, results from a mix of small airway disease (e.g., chronic bronchitis) and parenchymal destruction (emphysema), significantly impacting the quality of life of those affected.

    The pathophysiological foundation of COPD is a chronic inflammatory response in the airways and lung parenchyma to harmful particles or gases. This inflammation leads to structural changes, including airway narrowing, loss of alveolar attachments, decreased elastic recoil, and mucus hyper-secretion, all contributing to airflow limitation and respiratory symptoms.

    Primary risk factor for COPD is tobacco smoke, including second-hand exposure. Other factors are occupational exposure to dusts and chemicals, indoor air pollution, such as biomass fuel used for cooking and heating, outdoor air pollution, genetic factors with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, as well as aging, given the cumulative exposure to risk factors and the natural decline in lung function over time.

    COPD symptoms are progressive and include chronic cough, sputum production, and dyspnea. The severity of symptoms varies, with exacerbations (worsening of symptoms) often triggered by respiratory infections or environmental pollutants, leading to significant morbidity.

    The diagnosis of COPD is primarily based on the presence of respiratory symptoms and confirmed by spirometry, demonstrating a reduced ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) after bronchodilator administration. Other diagnostic tests may include chest imaging (X-ray or CT scan) and arterial blood gas analysis.

    COPD management focuses on reducing exposure to risk factors, relieving symptoms, preventing and treating exacerbations, and improving overall health status. Smoking cessation is the most effective intervention for preventing disease progression. Pharmacotherapy includes bronchodilators, corticosteroids, and combination therapies to reduce symptoms and prevent exacerbations. Pulmonary rehabilitation is a comprehensive intervention that includes exercise training, education, and behaviour change, designed to improve the physical and psychological condition of people with chronic respiratory disease. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccines are recommended to prevent respiratory infections. Long-term oxygen therapy will be required for individuals with chronic respiratory failure.

    Preventing COPD involves addressing the modifiable risk factors, primarily through public health policies aimed at reducing tobacco use, occupational exposures, and air pollution. COPD remains a significant public health challenge with a complex interplay of pathophysiological, environmental, and genetic factors. Early diagnosis and comprehensive management strategies are critical for improving outcomes for individuals with COPD. Continued research and policy efforts are needed to better understand the disease, reduce risk exposures, and develop more effective treatments.

    PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF COPD

    The pathophysiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is intricate, involving various pathological processes that contribute to the characteristic airflow limitation. This airflow limitation is largely irreversible and progressively worsens over time. The pathophysiological changes in COPD are primarily driven by chronic inflammation in response to inhaled noxious particles and gases, leading to structural changes in the lung, airway remodelling, and loss of lung elasticity. Understanding these processes in detail is crucial for the development of effective treatment and management strategies for COPD.

    The cornerstone of COPD pathophysiology is chronic inflammation caused by the inhalation of harmful particles or gases, with cigarette smoke being the most common culprit. This inflammation is characterised by increased inflammatory cells Including neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes (particularly CD8+ T cells). These cells are activated and recruited to the lungs, where they release a variety of inflammatory mediators. Inflammatory mediators such as Cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-8, IL-1β), chemokines, growth factors, and proteases are released, contributing to the inflammatory response, tissue damage, and remodelling of the airways.

    Oxidative stress results from an imbalance between antioxidants and reactive oxygen species (ROS), with COPD patients exhibiting increased levels of ROS. These ROS contribute to COPD pathogenesis by enhancing inflammation, damaging lung tissues, and affecting the function of antiproteases (e.g., alpha-1 antitrypsin), which protect the lung from enzymatic degradation.

    A critical aspect of COPD pathophysiology is the imbalance between proteases (enzymes that break down proteins) and antiproteases. This imbalance favours proteases, leading to the destruction of alveolar walls (emphysema) and contributing to airway inflammation and remodelling.

    Chronic inflammation leads to structural changes within the airways, collectively known as airway remodelling. These changes include:

                •           Mucous gland hyperplasia and hypersecretion: Increased size and number of mucous glands, along with increased production of mucus, contribute to airway obstruction.

                •           Fibrosis: Thickening of the airway wall due to fibrotic tissue deposition, narrowing the airways.

                •           Airway smooth muscle hypertrophy and hyperplasia: Increased muscle mass further narrows the airways and contributes to airflow limitation.

    The destruction of alveolar walls (emphysema) reduces the surface area available for gas exchange and decreases elastic recoil, leading to air trapping and reduced airflow. The loss of alveolar attachments also contributes to the collapse of small airways, further exacerbating airflow limitation.

    As COPD progresses, the destruction of alveolar tissue and the presence of chronic bronchitis impair the lungs’ ability to oxygenate blood and remove carbon dioxide. This can lead to hypoxemia (low blood oxygen levels) and hypercapnia (high blood carbon dioxide levels), contributing to respiratory failure in advanced stages.

    In response to chronic hypoxemia, the blood vessels in the lungs constrict (pulmonary vasoconstriction), increasing the pressure in the pulmonary arteries (pulmonary hypertension). This condition can lead to right heart failure (cor pulmonale) over time.

    COPD is not only a disease of the lungs but also has systemic effects, including muscle wasting, weight loss, and an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. These systemic effects are thought to be partly due to systemic inflammation and hypoxemia.

    In conclusion, COPD pathophysiology is characterised by chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, protease-antiprotease imbalance, airway remodelling, alveolar destruction, gas exchange abnormalities, pulmonary hypertension, and systemic effects. These interconnected processes contribute to the progressive nature of COPD and its significant morbidity and mortality. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing targeted therapies to manage and treat COPD effectively.

    ENZYMES INVOLVED IN PATHOLOGY OF COPD

    In Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), several enzymes play critical roles in the pathogenesis and progression of the disease, largely due to their involvement in inflammatory processes, tissue remodelling, and protease-antiprotease imbalance. Below is an overview of key enzymes involved in COPD, along with their substrates, activators, and inhibitors.

    Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs) are involved in the degradation of the extracellular matrix, contributing to emphysema’s alveolar wall destruction and airway remodelling. Substrates: Extracellular matrix components (e.g., collagen, elastin, fibronectin). Activators: Inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-1), oxidative stress. Inhibitors: Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs).

    Neutrophil elastase is a key enzyme in lung tissue destruction and mucus hypersecretion in COPD. Substrates: Elastin, collagen, and other extracellular matrix proteins. Activators: Produced by activated neutrophils in response to inflammatory stimuli. Inhibitors: Alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT), secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI).

    Cathepsins are lysosomal enzymes that contribute to the breakdown of the extracellular matrix, with specific types (e.g., cathepsin K, S, L) being implicated in COPD pathogenesis. Substrates: Extracellular matrix components. Activators: Lysosomal activation, cellular damage. Inhibitors: Cystatins, stefins.

    Proteinase 3 shares many substrates with neutrophil elastase and plays a role in inflammatory processes and tissue damage in COPD.  Substrates: Elastin, other extracellular matrix proteins. Activators: Similar to neutrophil elastase, produced by activated neutrophils. Inhibitors: Alpha-1 antitrypsin.

    Myeloperoxidase (MPO) contributes to oxidative stress and tissue damage in COPD. Substrates: Produces hypochlorous acid and other reactive oxygen species from hydrogen peroxide. Activators: Activated neutrophils and monocytes. Inhibitors: Antioxidants (e.g., ascorbic acid, glutathione).

    Nitric Oxide Synthase (NOS) produces nitric oxide, which has diverse roles in inflammation, vasodilation, and airway tone regulation. Substrates: L-arginine. Activators: Various stimuli, including inflammatory cytokines. Inhibitors: Specific inhibitors for each NOS isoform (e.g., L-NMMA for iNOS).

    Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) is involved in the regulation of inflammatory cell activity by modulating levels of cAMP, making it a target for COPD treatment to reduce inflammation. Substrates: cAMP. Activators: Inflammatory signals. Inhibitors: PDE4 inhibitors (e.g., Roflumilast).

    These enzymes and their regulation play crucial roles in the development, progression, and exacerbation of COPD. Targeting these enzymes with specific inhibitors can help manage the disease, reduce symptoms, and improve the quality of life for patients with COPD.

    ROLE OF HORMONES

    In Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), hormonal imbalances can contribute to the disease’s pathophysiology and impact systemic manifestations. Several hormones and related molecules play roles in inflammation, metabolic processes, and the body’s stress response, influencing the course of COPD. Here are some key hormones involved in COPD and their target molecules or effects:

    Cortisol: Target Molecules/Effects : Glucocorticoid receptor activation leads to anti-inflammatory effects, including inhibition of inflammatory gene transcription and suppression of immune cell activity. However, chronic stress and prolonged cortisol elevation may contribute to systemic effects and potentially steroid resistance in the lung.

    Catecholamines (Epinephrine and Norepinephrine):  Target Molecules/Effects : Beta-adrenergic receptors on airway smooth muscle cells; activation leads to bronchodilation. These hormones are part of the body’s stress response and can influence heart rate, blood pressure, and airway tone.

    Leptin: Target Molecules/Effects: Leptin receptors in the hypothalamus and on immune cells; influences appetite regulation and promotes pro-inflammatory responses. Increased levels of leptin have been associated with systemic inflammation in COPD.

    Adiponectin: Target Molecules/Effects: AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 receptors; generally has anti-inflammatory effects on the immune system. Lower levels of adiponectin are associated with increased COPD risk and severity, possibly due to its role in metabolic regulation and inflammation.

    Growth Hormone (GH) and Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1): Target Molecules/Effects: GH receptor on liver and other tissues, leading to the production of IGF-1, which acts on IGF-1 receptors affecting cellular growth and metabolism. These hormones can influence body composition, including muscle and bone mass, which are often adversely affected in advanced COPD.

    Sex Hormones (Estrogens and Androgens):  Target Molecules/Effects: Estrogen and androgen receptors; influence immune function and may have protective (or in some cases, deleterious) effects on lung function. The impact of sex hormones on COPD progression is complex and may differ between males and females.

    Vitamin D: Target Molecules/Effects: Vitamin D receptor; influences immune cell function, including anti-inflammatory effects and modulation of infection responses. Vitamin D deficiency is common in COPD and may contribute to disease severity and increased susceptibility to respiratory infections.

    Thyroid Hormones (Triiodothyronine [T3] and Thyroxine [T4]):  Target Molecules/Effects: Nuclear thyroid hormone receptors; regulate metabolic rate and energy balance. Thyroid hormone imbalances can affect respiratory muscle function and overall energy levels, potentially impacting COPD outcomes.

    These hormones and their interactions with target molecules play a critical role in COPD’s systemic effects, influencing metabolism, inflammation, immune response, and respiratory muscle function. Understanding these relationships provides insight into potential therapeutic targets and the management of COPD’s systemic manifestations.

    CYTOKINES INVOLVED IN COPD

    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterised by chronic inflammation in the airways, lung parenchyma, and systemic circulation. This inflammation is mediated by various cytokines—small signalling proteins that play crucial roles in cell signalling. These cytokines can either drive the inflammatory response, leading to tissue damage and disease progression, or attempt to resolve inflammation and repair tissue.

    Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α): Target Molecules/Effects: TNF receptors on various cell types; stimulates inflammation, activates neutrophils and macrophages, and contributes to airway and systemic inflammation.

    Interleukin-6 (IL-6): Target Molecules/Effects: IL-6 receptor; plays a role in inflammation and immune response, contributing to systemic effects of COPD such as muscle wasting and increased cardiovascular risk.

    Interleukin-8 (IL-8, CXCL8):  Target Molecules/Effects: CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors; a potent chemokine that attracts neutrophils to the site of inflammation, leading to neutrophilic infiltration of the airways in COPD.

    Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β): Target Molecules/Effects: IL-1 receptor; involved in airway and systemic inflammation, activating macrophages and epithelial cells to release further pro-inflammatory cytokines.

    Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF-β): Target Molecules/Effects: TGF-β receptors; plays a dual role by contributing to airway remodelling and fibrosis on the one hand, and suppressing inflammation on the other hand. It’s heavily involved in the tissue repair process but can lead to pathological changes when dysregulated.

    Interleukin-17 (IL-17):  Target Molecules/Effects: IL-17 receptor; promotes neutrophilic inflammation by stimulating the release of neutrophil-attracting chemokines (e.g., IL-8) and is associated with severe and steroid-resistant forms of COPD.

    Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ):  Target Molecules/Effects: IFN-γ receptor; primarily produced by T cells and natural killer cells, involved in the modulation of immune response and has been linked with chronic inflammation in COPD.

    Interleukin-10 (IL-10): Target Molecules/Effects: IL-10 receptor; an anti-inflammatory cytokine that plays a role in limiting and terminating inflammatory responses, its levels are often found to be decreased in COPD patients.

    Interleukin-4 (IL-4) and Interleukin-13 (IL-13): Target Molecules/Effects: IL-4 and IL-13 receptors; both cytokines are involved in allergic responses and airway remodelling. They can influence IgE production, mucus secretion, and contribute to the pathogenesis of asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS).

    Chemokines (e.g., CCL2, CCL3, CCL5): Target Molecules/Effects: Corresponding chemokine receptors; involved in the recruitment of various immune cells (e.g., monocytes, lymphocytes, eosinophils) to the lung, contributing to the inflammatory milieu in COPD.

    These cytokines and their interactions play a pivotal role in the initiation, maintenance, and progression of inflammation in COPD. They serve as potential targets for therapeutic intervention, aiming to modulate the inflammatory response and improve patient outcomes in COPD management.

    ROLE OF FREE RADICALS AND SUPEROXIDES

    In the molecular pathology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), free radicals and superoxides play a significant role in initiating and perpetuating the inflammatory processes, contributing to the tissue damage and disease progression observed in COPD patients. These reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) can originate from both endogenous sources, such as mitochondrial electron transport during cellular respiration, and exogenous sources, including cigarette smoke, air pollution, and occupational dusts and chemicals.

    Central to the pathogenesis of COPD is oxidative stress, characterised by an imbalance between the production of ROS (like superoxides, hydroxyl radicals, and hydrogen peroxide) and the body’s ability to detoxify these reactive intermediates or to repair the resulting damage. This imbalance leads to damage of cellular components, including lipids, proteins, and DNA. ROS play a crucial role in activating various cell-signalling pathways (e.g., NF-κB, MAPK) that lead to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8), chemokines, and other mediators of inflammation. This inflammation further recruits immune cells into the lung, which produce more ROS, creating a vicious cycle. ROS can inactivate antiprotease defences like alpha-1 antitrypsin, leading to an imbalance favouring protease activity. This protease activity, especially from neutrophil elastase and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), leads to the destruction of alveolar structures (emphysema) and contributes to mucus hypersecretion and airway remodelling. Oxidative stress can directly stimulate mucus secretion from goblet cells and submucosal glands, contributing to airway obstruction. ROS can also modulate the expression of mucin genes, leading to the overproduction of mucus. ROS contribute to airway remodelling by inducing the proliferation of airway smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts, and by activating epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), processes that thicken the airway wall and narrow the airway lumen. ROS can impair the function of cilia (ciliostasis) and reduce the effectiveness of the mucociliary escalator, a key defence mechanism against inhaled particles and pathogens. This impairment can increase susceptibility to respiratory infections, a common trigger for COPD exacerbations.  Beyond the lungs, oxidative stress in COPD is linked to systemic inflammation and extra-pulmonary complications, including cardiovascular diseases, muscle wasting, and osteoporosis, contributing to the overall morbidity and mortality associated with COPD.

    Given the role of oxidative stress in COPD, antioxidants have been explored as potential therapeutic agents. However, the efficacy of antioxidant supplements in COPD management remains inconclusive. The complexity of ROS roles and the need for a delicate balance between pro-oxidant and antioxidant forces in the body make targeting oxidative stress a challenging but promising area of research. Therapies that can effectively reduce oxidative stress or enhance the body’s antioxidant defences are of considerable interest for improving outcomes in COPD patients.

    HEAVY METALS AND MICROELEMENTS

    The role of heavy metals and microelements in the development and progression of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is an area of growing interest and research. These substances can have both harmful and beneficial impacts on pulmonary health, depending on their nature and levels of exposure.

    Heavy metals such as cadmium, lead, and arsenic are known to contribute to the pathogenesis of COPD through various mechanisms.

    A significant component of cigarette smoke and industrial emissions, cadmium can accumulate in the lungs, leading to oxidative stress, inflammation, and disruption of cellular processes. It mimics the effects of smoking in terms of COPD development, even in non-smokers exposed to high levels of this metal.

    Exposure to lead and arsenic, primarily through environmental and occupational sources, has been associated with increased risk of respiratory symptoms and reductions in lung function. They promote oxidative stress and inflammation, similar to cadmium.

    The harmful effects of heavy metals in COPD are generally mediated through oxidative stress, induction of inflammation, impairment of lung function, and inhibition of the lung’s natural defence mechanisms against inhaled particles and pathogens.

    Microelements, or trace elements, such as selenium, zinc, and copper, play complex roles in lung health, with their balance being crucial for optimal respiratory function:

    Selenium is an antioxidant trace element that is a component of glutathione peroxidases, enzymes that help protect cells from oxidative damage. Low selenium levels have been linked to increased risk of lung diseases, including COPD, suggesting a protective role against oxidative stress.

    Essential for immune function, zinc plays a role in maintaining the integrity of respiratory epithelium and modulating inflammation. Zinc deficiency has been observed in COPD patients and is associated with increased susceptibility to infection and potentially exacerbations of the disease.

    While necessary for certain enzyme functions, including antioxidant defence, an imbalance with high levels of copper can contribute to oxidative stress, potentially exacerbating COPD pathology.

    Magnesium is important for smooth muscle function and has been shown to have bronchodilatory effects. Low levels of magnesium can lead to increased bronchial reactivity and have been associated with worse outcomes in COPD.

    Given the role of oxidative stress in COPD and the potential protective effects of certain microelements, there has been interest in the use of supplements to correct deficiencies and mitigate disease progression. However, the efficacy and safety of supplementation (e.g., selenium, zinc) for COPD patients remain subjects for ongoing research.

    For heavy metals, reducing exposure is crucial. This includes smoking cessation and implementing occupational and environmental safety measures to limit contact with harmful metals.

    The relationship between heavy metals, microelements, and COPD underscores the importance of environmental and nutritional factors in respiratory health. Understanding these relationships helps in identifying potential strategies for prevention and management of COPD, highlighting the need for a comprehensive approach that includes both dietary considerations and environmental protections.

    ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS IN COPD

    Environmental factors play a significant role in the development and exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), with various pollutants and occupational exposures contributing to the onset and progression of this complex respiratory condition. While smoking is the most well-known risk factor, the impact of environmental factors is substantial, affecting both smokers and non-smokers alike.

    Long-term exposure to outdoor air pollutants, such as particulate matter (PM), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and ozone (O3), is associated with an increased risk of developing COPD. These pollutants can induce oxidative stress, inflammation in the airways, and may impair lung function over time.

    Exposure to indoor pollutants, especially in poorly ventilated spaces, significantly impacts respiratory health. Common sources include biomass fuel combustion (used for cooking and heating in many parts of the world), tobacco smoke, and household chemicals. These pollutants contribute to the chronic inflammation and oxidative stress seen in COPD.

    Workers in certain industries face a higher risk of developing COPD due to exposure to dusts, chemicals, and fumes. Coal mining, woodworking, and textile industries can expose workers to significant amounts of organic and inorganic dust, leading to respiratory symptoms and COPD. Exposure to various chemicals, such as ammonia, chlorine, and sulphur dioxide, as well as fumes from welding or working with plastics, can irritate the airways and contribute to COPD development.

    Socioeconomic status can influence COPD risk indirectly through several pathways. Lower socioeconomic status is often associated with higher exposure to indoor and outdoor air pollution, occupational hazards, and a higher prevalence of smoking. Moreover, limited access to healthcare and preventive measures can exacerbate the impact of these environmental exposures.

    Climate change is expected to exacerbate COPD risks and outcomes through several mechanisms. Increased temperatures and changes in weather patterns can intensify air pollution and pollen levels, potentially leading to more frequent and severe COPD exacerbations. Furthermore, extreme weather events, such as heatwaves and wildfires, can directly impact air quality and respiratory health.

    Environmental factors can also influence the frequency and severity of respiratory infections, which are a major trigger for COPD exacerbations. Poor air quality, overcrowding, and inadequate ventilation can increase exposure to respiratory pathogens.

    Given the significant role of environmental factors in COPD, strategies for prevention and mitigation are crucial. Policies and practices aimed at reducing air pollution, both indoors and outdoors, are essential. This includes reducing emissions from vehicles, industries, and the use of clean cooking fuels. Implementing safety standards and protective measures in workplaces can reduce exposure to harmful dusts, fumes, and chemicals. Smoking cessation programs, vaccination campaigns, and health education can help reduce COPD risk and severity. Addressing the broader issue of climate change can indirectly benefit COPD outcomes by improving air quality and reducing extreme weather-related health impacts.

    Understanding and addressing the environmental determinants of COPD is crucial for developing effective public health strategies and interventions to prevent and manage this debilitating disease.

    Lifestyle and food habits significantly influence the risk, progression, and management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). While smoking remains the most critical risk factor for developing COPD, other lifestyle factors, including diet, physical activity, and exposure to environmental pollutants, play vital roles in the disease’s onset, severity, and patients’ quality of life.

    Nutritional status has a profound effect on lung health and COPD outcomes. A balanced diet rich in antioxidants, vitamins, and minerals can help mitigate oxidative stress and inflammation, key factors in COPD pathogenesis. Fruits, vegetables, nuts, and whole grains are high in antioxidants (such as vitamins C and E, beta-carotene, and selenium) that can help combat oxidative stress in the lungs. Found in fish and flaxseed, omega-3 fatty acids have anti-inflammatory properties that may benefit individuals with COPD. Adequate protein intake is crucial for maintaining muscle strength and function, particularly important in COPD patients who are at risk of cachexia and muscle wasting. Highly processed foods can increase inflammation and may negatively impact lung function and COPD symptoms.

    Regular physical activity is essential for maintaining and improving lung function and overall health in COPD patients. Helps improve cardiovascular health, muscle strength, and endurance, which can be compromised in COPD. Pulmonary rehabilitation programs often include exercise training tailored to individual capabilities. A sedentary lifestyle can exacerbate the loss of muscle mass and function, leading to worse outcomes in COPD. Smoking cessation is the most effective intervention to slow the progression of COPD. Exposure to secondhand smoke and the use of other inhaled substances (e.g., vaping, occupational or environmental pollutants) also significantly impact lung health.

    Both underweight and obesity can negatively affect COPD outcomes. Often due to muscle wasting and cachexia, underweight is associated with increased risk of exacerbations and mortality. Obesity can exacerbate breathlessness and reduce exercise capacity. Weight management strategies should be part of a comprehensive COPD care plan.

    Adequate hydration is essential, as it helps thin mucus, making it easier to clear from the lungs. Excessive alcohol intake can impair immune function, increase the risk of respiratory infections, and interact negatively with COPD medications. Avoiding exposure to indoor and outdoor air pollutants, such as vehicle emissions, industrial pollution, and indoor cooking with biomass fuels, is crucial for lung health.

    Lifestyle modifications, including a balanced diet, regular physical activity, smoking cessation, and careful management of environmental exposures, play crucial roles in managing COPD. These changes can help reduce symptoms, decrease the frequency of exacerbations, and improve overall health and quality of life for individuals with COPD. Tailored nutritional advice and physical activity programs should be considered integral components of COPD management plans.

    ROLE OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES IN COPD

    Infectious diseases, particularly those affecting the respiratory system, play a significant role in the causation and exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Both acute and chronic infections can influence the development, progression, and clinical course of COPD through various mechanisms, including direct lung damage, inflammation, and alterations in immune responses. Understanding the relationship between infectious diseases and COPD is crucial for prevention, early detection, and management of this chronic respiratory condition.

    Acute respiratory infections, such as those caused by influenza, rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and Streptococcus pneumoniae, can lead to significant worsening of COPD symptoms, known as exacerbations. These exacerbations are key events in the natural history of COPD that contribute to accelerated lung function decline, reduced quality of life, increased healthcare utilisation, and higher mortality rates.

    Acute infections can increase airway inflammation, enhance mucus production, and impair the function of cilia, the small hair-like structures that help clear mucus and debris from the airways. These changes exacerbate airflow obstruction and respiratory symptoms.

    Certain chronic infections are also implicated in the development and progression of COPD. Past tuberculosis (TB) infection can cause lung damage leading to chronic airflow obstruction, a form of post-TB COPD. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM): Infections can lead to a progressive decline in lung function, particularly in individuals with pre-existing lung conditions like COPD. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection may indirectly increase the risk of developing COPD by affecting the immune system’s ability to respond to pulmonary infections and by increasing the susceptibility to opportunistic lung infections.

    The lower airways in healthy individuals are typically sterile, but in COPD patients, chronic colonisation by bacteria (such as Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa) can occur. This bacterial colonization contributes to chronic inflammation and is associated with more frequent exacerbations and a faster decline in lung function.

    Infectious agents contribute to COPD pathogenesis by eliciting a chronic inflammatory response and altering immune responses. Persistent inflammation, even in the absence of active infection, can lead to tissue damage, remodelling of the airways, and progressive loss of lung function. Moreover, COPD itself may impair the lung’s defences, making it more susceptible to infections, thereby creating a vicious cycle of infection and inflammation.

    Immunisations against influenza and pneumococcus are recommended for COPD patients to reduce the risk of respiratory infections and exacerbations. Smoking increases the risk of respiratory infections and is the primary risk factor for COPD; quitting smoking can reduce these risks. Programs that include exercise, education, and support can improve immune function and overall health. Timely and appropriate use of these medications can help manage acute exacerbations of COPD caused by infections.

    In summary, infectious diseases play a critical role in the causation and exacerbation of COPD. Strategies to prevent respiratory infections and manage chronic colonisation can significantly impact the course of COPD, highlighting the importance of comprehensive care approaches that include infection control as a central component.

    ROLE OF PHYTOCHEMICALS

    Phytochemicals, the bioactive compounds found in plants, have garnered significant interest for their potential therapeutic effects in various diseases, including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The pathophysiology of COPD involves chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and an imbalance in protease and antiprotease activity in the lungs. Phytochemicals, with their anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immunomodulatory properties, may offer beneficial effects in managing COPD symptoms and progression.

    Flavonoids have been shown to exert anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, reducing oxidative stress and inhibiting the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and mediators. Quercetin, in particular, has been studied for its ability to inhibit neutrophil elastase, an enzyme involved in the degradation of lung tissue in COPD.

     Carotenoids are potent antioxidants that can neutralise free radicals, reducing oxidative stress in the lungs. Higher dietary intakes of carotenoids have been associated with a lower risk of COPD development and may improve lung function.

    Curcumin has been highlighted for its potent anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. It can inhibit NF-κB, a key transcription factor involved in the inflammatory response, potentially reducing airway inflammation and oxidative stress in COPD.

    Sulforaphane activates the Nrf2 pathway, which increases the expression of antioxidant enzymes, offering protection against oxidative damage in the lungs. It may also have anti-inflammatory effects beneficial in COPD.

    Resveratrol has anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-fibrotic properties. It can modulate inflammation and oxidative stress, potentially improving lung function and reducing COPD exacerbations.

    Though not a phytochemical, omega-3 fatty acids from plant sources have anti-inflammatory effects that may benefit COPD patients by reducing airway inflammation and improving lung function.

    Incorporating foods rich in these phytochemicals into the diet or through supplementation may offer protective effects against COPD progression. However, the effectiveness and optimal dosages of phytochemical supplements need more research.  Phytochemicals may serve as adjunct therapy in COPD management, alongside conventional treatments. Their ability to target multiple pathways involved in COPD pathogenesis makes them promising candidates for further investigation.

    While the potential of phytochemicals in COPD is promising, it is important to approach their use with caution. Further clinical trials are needed to fully understand their efficacy, safety, and optimal administration methods. Nonetheless, a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and other sources of phytochemicals is beneficial for overall health and may contribute to better outcomes in individuals with COPD.

    VITAMINS

    Vitamins play an essential role in maintaining lung health and may influence the course of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Given the disease’s association with chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and immune dysfunction, certain vitamins, due to their anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and immune-modulating properties, have been of particular interest in COPD management. Here’s an overview of the role of specific vitamins in COPD:

    Vitamin D has anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. It can influence lung function and health by modulating immune responses and reducing the risk of respiratory infections, which are common triggers for COPD exacerbations. Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent in COPD patients and has been associated with increased severity and frequency of exacerbations. Sources: Sunlight exposure, fatty fish, fortified foods, and supplements.

    Vitamin C is a potent antioxidant that can neutralize free radicals, reducing oxidative stress in the lungs. It also supports the immune system and may help protect against respiratory infections. Observational studies suggest that higher dietary intake of vitamin C is associated with better lung function and reduced COPD risk. Sources: Citrus fruits, berries, kiwi, bell peppers, and broccoli.

    Vitamin E possesses antioxidant properties that can help protect lung tissue from oxidative damage caused by cigarette smoke and other pollutants. There is evidence to suggest that higher intake of vitamin E may be associated with a lower risk of developing COPD, although more research is needed to establish a causal relationship. Sources: Nuts, seeds, vegetable oils, and green leafy vegetables.

    Vitamin A and its precursors (like beta-carotene) play a critical role in maintaining healthy mucous membranes in the respiratory tract and supporting immune function. Deficiency in vitamin A has been linked to impaired lung function and a higher risk of respiratory infections. Sources: Liver, dairy products, fish, and foods high in beta-carotene (such as carrots, sweet potatoes, and leafy greens).

    B vitamins, including B6, B12, and folic acid, are involved in homocysteine metabolism. Elevated levels of homocysteine have been linked to increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, which are common comorbidities in COPD patients. B vitamins may play a role in reducing homocysteine levels, although direct effects on COPD progression need further research. Sources: Whole grains, eggs, dairy products, meat, fish, and legumes.

    Vitamin supplementation, particularly for vitamins D, C, and E, may benefit some COPD patients, especially those with documented deficiencies. However, supplementation should be considered carefully and personalized based on individual needs and existing medical guidance. A balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, lean proteins, and whole grains is recommended to ensure adequate intake of these vitamins and support overall health and lung function.

    While there’s growing interest in the potential therapeutic roles of vitamins in COPD, it’s important to approach supplementation judiciously. Over-supplementation of certain vitamins can have adverse effects. Therefore, it is crucial to consult healthcare providers for personalised advice, especially for patients with COPD, to ensure an optimal and safe approach to vitamin intake through diet and/or supplements.

    ROLE OF MODERN CHEMICAL DRUGS IN COPD

    The role of modern chemical drugs in the causation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is not a primary concern in medical research or clinical practice, as COPD is mainly caused by long-term exposure to irritants that damage the lungs and airways, with cigarette smoke being the most common. However, certain medications have been noted for their potential respiratory side effects, though these are relatively rare and not a significant factor in the majority of COPD cases. Instead, the focus on drugs in COPD is generally on their therapeutic roles and how they can mitigate symptoms, slow disease progression, and improve quality of life. Below, we’ll outline the molecular mechanisms of action of common drug classes used in COPD management rather than causation:

    Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS) reduce inflammation in the airways by inhibiting the transcription of genes that code for pro-inflammatory proteins and by activating anti-inflammatory genes. This can help decrease airway hyper-responsiveness, mucus production, and edema. Examples: Fluticasone, budesonide.

    Long-Acting Beta-Agonists (LABAs) stimulate beta-2 adrenergic receptors on airway smooth muscle cells, leading to relaxation and dilation of the airways. This reduces bronchoconstriction and improves airflow. Examples: Salmeterol, formoterol.

    Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonists (LAMAs) block muscarinic receptors in the airways, preventing the binding of acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter that causes bronchoconstriction. This results in relaxation and widening of the airways. Examples: Tiotropium, aclidinium.

    Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) Inhibitors target PDE4, an enzyme that breaks down cyclic AMP (cAMP) in lung cells. By inhibiting PDE4, these drugs increase cAMP levels, leading to reduced inflammation in the airways. Examples: Roflumilast.

    Mucolytics reduce the thickness of mucus in the airways, making it easier to clear. This can help reduce the frequency of exacerbations in some patients with COPD who have a chronic productive cough. Examples: N-acetylcysteine, carbocisteine.

    Antibiotics are used selectively for managing acute exacerbations of COPD that are caused by bacterial infections, antibiotics can reduce bacterial load and secondary inflammation in the airways. Examples: Azithromycin, doxycycline.

    While these medications are vital for managing COPD, they are not without potential side effects. For instance, inhaled corticosteroids can increase the risk of pneumonia, especially in high doses or in susceptible individuals. However, the benefits of appropriately used COPD medications far outweigh the potential risks for most patients.

    In summary, modern chemical drugs are primarily used in the management of COPD rather than being a cause of the condition. Their mechanisms of action are designed to address the pathophysiological changes in COPD, such as inflammation, bronchoconstriction, and mucus production, to improve lung function, reduce symptoms, and enhance quality of life for patients with this chronic disease.

    PSYCHOLOGICAL AND NEUROLOGICAL FACTORS

    Psychological and neurological factors do not directly cause Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), a condition primarily resulting from long-term exposure to lung irritants like cigarette smoke, air pollution, and occupational dusts and chemicals. However, these factors can significantly impact the course of the disease, its management, and patient outcomes. Understanding the interplay between psychological, neurological factors, and COPD is crucial for comprehensive care.

    Chronic stress and anxiety can exacerbate COPD symptoms. Stressful conditions may lead to behaviours like smoking or poor adherence to treatment, worsening the disease. Moreover, the physiological effects of stress can increase inflammation, potentially exacerbating COPD symptoms.

    Depression is common among individuals with COPD and can affect the disease’s progression. Patients with depression may have lower motivation to maintain treatment regimens, engage in physical activity, or seek medical help, leading to poorer health outcomes.

    The psychological burden of living with a chronic disease like COPD can influence a person’s coping mechanisms. Maladaptive coping, such as continued smoking or substance use, can directly impact the disease progression and overall health.

    COPD can lead to decreased oxygen levels (hypoxia), which can impair cognitive functions over time. Cognitive impairment in COPD patients can affect their ability to follow treatment plans, recognise symptoms of exacerbations, and perform daily activities.

    COPD may involve dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system, which controls breathing patterns and airway reactivity. This dysregulation can contribute to symptoms like breathlessness and may influence the disease’s progression.

    COPD is associated with sleep-related issues, including sleep apnea, which can lead to fragmented sleep and further exacerbate daytime fatigue and cognitive function. Poor sleep quality can also impact mood and quality of life, creating a cycle that may worsen COPD outcomes.

    Given the complex relationships between psychological/neurological factors and COPD, integrated care approaches are essential. Interventions might include Counseling, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and support groups can help patients manage stress, anxiety, and depression, potentially improving adherence to treatment and overall quality of life. Programs that combine exercise training, education, and psychological support can address both the physical and emotional aspects of COPD, improving symptoms and functional status. Regular cognitive assessments can identify patients who may benefit from interventions to improve cognitive function, including strategies to enhance oxygenation and manage sleep issues.

    In conclusion, while psychological and neurological factors do not cause COPD, they are critically important in its management and progression. A holistic approach that includes addressing these factors can lead to better patient outcomes and improved quality of life for those living with COPD.

    MIT APPROACH TO THERAPEUTICS OF COPD

    DRUG MOLECULES act as therapeutic agents due to their CHEMICAL properties. It is an allopathic action, same way as any allopathic or ayurvedic drug works. They can interact with biological molecules and produce short term or longterm harmful effects, exactly similar to allopathic drugs. Please keep this point in mind when you have a temptation to use mother tinctures, low potencies or biochemical salts which are MOLECULAR drugs.

    On the other hand, MOLECULAR IMPRINTS contained in homeopathic drugs potentized above 12 or avogadro limit act as therapeutic agents by working as artificial ligand binds for pathogenic molecules due to their conformational properties by a biological mechanism that is truly homeopathic.

    Understanding the fundamental difference between molecular imprinted drugs regarding their biological mechanism of actions, is very important.

    MIT or Molecular Imprints Therapeutics refers to a scientific hypothesis that proposes a rational model for biological mechanism of homeopathic therapeutics. According to MIT hypothesis, potentization involves a process of ‘molecular imprinting’, where in the conformational details of individual drug molecules are ‘imprinted or engraved as hydrogen- bonded three-dimensional nano-cavities into a supra-molecular matrix of water and ethyl alcohol, through a process of molecular level ‘host-guest’ interactions. These ‘molecular imprints’ are the active principles of post-avogadro dilutions used as homeopathic drugs. Due to ‘conformational affinity’, molecular imprints can act as ‘artificial key holes or ligand binds’ for the specific drug molecules used for imprinting, and for all pathogenic molecules having functional groups ‘similar’ to those drug molecules. When used as therapeutic agents, molecular imprints selectively bind to the pathogenic molecules having conformational affinity and deactivate them, thereby relieving the biological molecules from the inhibitions or blocks caused by pathogenic molecules.

    According to MIT hypothesis, this is the biological mechanism of high dilution therapeutics involved in homeopathic cure. According to MIT hypothesis, ‘Similia Similibus Curentur’ means, diseases expressed through a particular group of symptoms could be cured by ‘molecular imprints’ forms of drug substances, which in ‘molecular’ or crude forms could produce ‘similar’ groups of symptoms in healthy individuals. ‘Similarity’ of drug symptoms and diseases indicates ‘similarity’ of pathological molecular inhibitions caused by drug molecules and pathogenic molecules, which in turn indicates conformational ‘similarity’ of functional groups of drug molecules and pathogenic molecules. Since molecular imprints of ‘similar’ molecules can bind to ‘similar ligand molecules by conformational affinity, they can act as the therapeutics agents when applied as indicated by ‘similarity of symptoms. Nobody in the whole history could so far propose a hypothesis about homeopathy as scientific, rational and perfect as MIT explaining the molecular process involved in potentization, and the biological mechanism involved in ‘similia similibus- curentur, in a way fitting well to modern scientific knowledge system.

    If symptoms expressed in a particular disease condition as well as symptoms produced in a healthy individual by a particular drug substance were similar, it means the disease-causing molecules and the drug molecules could bind to same biological targets and produce similar molecular errors, which in turn means both of them have similar functional groups or molecular conformations. This phenomenon of competitive relationship between similar chemical molecules in binding to similar biological targets scientifically explains the fundamental homeopathic principle Similia Similibus Curentur.

    Practically, MIT or Molecular Imprints Therapeutics is all about identifying the specific target-ligand ‘key-lock’ mechanism involved in the molecular pathology of the particular disease, procuring the samples of concerned ligand molecules or molecules that can mimic as the ligands by conformational similarity, preparing their molecular imprints through a process of homeopathic potentization upto 30c potency, and using that preparation as therapeutic agent.

    Since individual molecular imprints contained in drugs potentized above avogadro limit cannot interact each other or interfere in the normal interactions between biological molecules and their natural ligands, and since they can act only as artificial binding sites for specific pathogenic molecules having conformational affinity, there cannot by any adverse effects or reduction in medicinal effects even if we mix two or more potentized drugs together, or prescribe them simultaneously- they will work.

    Based on the detailed analysis of pathophysiology, enzyme kinetics and hormonal interactions involved, MIT approach suggests following molecular imprinted drugs to be included in the therapeutics of COPD:

    Hydrogen petoxide 30, Carbo veg 30, Interleukin -1 30, Collagen 30, Fibronectin 30, Elastin 30, Amyl nitrosum 30, Adrenalin 30, Leptin 30, Thyroidinum 30, Cadmium 30, Arsenic alb 30, Tobacco smoke 30, TNF-a 30, Interlekin-8 30, Cuprum Ars 30, Sulphur 30, Ozone 30, House dust 30, Influenzinum 30, Rhinovirus 30, Streptococcinum 30, Tuberculinum 30.

    REFERENCES:

             1.      Vogelmeier, C. F., et al. (2017). “Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report: GOLD Executive Summary.” European Respiratory Journal, 49(3).

             2.      Adeloye, D., et al. (2015). “Global and regional estimates of COPD prevalence: Systematic review and meta–analysis.” Journal of Global Health, 5(2).

             3.      Agustí, A., & Hogg, J. C. (2019). “Update on the Pathogenesis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.” New England Journal of Medicine, 381(13), 1248-1256.

             4.      Barnes, P. J. (2017). “Inflammatory Mechanisms in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 138(1), 16-27.

             5.      Celli, B. R., & Wedzicha, J. A. (2019). “Update on Clinical Aspects of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.” New England Journal of Medicine, 381(13), 1257-1266.

             6.      Qaseem, A., Wilt, T. J., Weinberger, S. E., et al. (2011). “Diagnosis and Management of Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians.” Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(3), 179-191.

             7.      Rabe, K. F., Watz, H. (2017). “Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.” Lancet, 389(10082), 1931-1940.

             8.      Singh, D., Agusti, A., Anzueto, A., et al. (2019). “Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: The GOLD Science Committee Report 2019.” European Respiratory Journal, 53(5).

             9.      Lareau, S. C., & Fahy, B. (2019). “The Role of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.” Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease, 13.

             10.    Tønnesen, P., Carrozzi, L., Fagerström, K. O., et al. (2007). “Smoking cessation in patients with respiratory diseases: a high priority, integral component of therapy.” European Respiratory Journal, 29(2), 390-417.

             11.    Brightling, C. E., Bleecker, E. R., Panettieri, R. A., Jr., et al. (2019). “Benralizumab for the Prevention of COPD Exacerbations.” New England Journal of Medicine, 381(11), 1023-1034.

             12.    Polkey, M. I., Spruit, M. A., Edwards, L. D., et al. (2013). “Six-minute-walk test in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: minimal clinically important difference for death or hospitalization.” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 187(4), 382-386.

             13. J H Clarke, A Dictionary of Homeopathic Materia Medica

             14. www.redefininghomeopathy.com, Chandran Nambiar KC

  • MIT HOMEOPATHY APPROACH TO ALOPECIA AND BALDNESS

    Hair loss and baldness are conditions that affect millions of individuals worldwide, leading to psychological distress and diminished quality of life for many. This article provides a comprehensive overview of hair loss (also known as alopecia) and baldness, including their causes, types, diagnostic methods, modern treatment options, and preventative measures, and MIT homeopathy approach to its therapeutics.

    Hair loss can be temporary or permanent and can affect just the scalp or the entire body. While it is more prevalent in adults, hair loss can also occur in children. Baldness typically refers to excessive hair loss from the scalp and is often the result of hereditary hair loss with age.

    Hair loss and baldness can be attributed to a variety of factors. The most common cause of hair loss is a hereditary condition called androgenetic alopecia, more commonly known as male-pattern or female-pattern baldness. Hormonal changes due to pregnancy, childbirth, menopause, or thyroid problems can cause temporary or permanent hair loss. Conditions such as alopecia areata (an autoimmune disease that attacks hair follicles), scalp infections like ringworm, and trichotillomania (a hair-pulling disorder) can lead to hair loss. Hair loss can be a side effect of certain drugs, such as those used for cancer, arthritis, depression, heart problems, gout, and high blood pressure. Lack of nutrients such as iron, protein, and vitamins can contribute to hair loss. Physical or emotional stress can trigger temporary hair loss.

    Androgenetic Alopecia is a hereditary condition affecting both men and women and is characterised by a receding hairline and the disappearance of hair from the crown and frontal scalp. Alopecia Areata is a condition that causes patchy hair loss on the scalp and possibly other areas of the body. Telogen Effluvium is a temporary hair loss condition that usually happens after stress, a shock, or a traumatic event and typically involves the thinning of hair rather than bald patche. Anagen Effluvium is rapid hair loss resulting from medical treatment, such as chemotherapy.

    Diagnosing hair loss involves a medical history and physical examination by a healthcare provider. Tests might include: 1. Blood Tests: To uncover medical conditions related to hair loss. 2. Pull Test: A gentle tug on a few strands of hair to determine the stage of the shedding process. 3. Scalp Biopsy: Taking a small section of the scalp to examine under a microscope. 4. Light Microscopy: To examine hairs trimmed at their bases.

    Treatment depends on the type of hair loss, its severity, and whether it’s temporary or permanent. Options may include: 1. Medications: Over the counter (OTC) or prescription drugs such as minoxidil (Rogaine) or finasteride (Propecia). 2. Hair Transplant Surgery: Removing small plugs of hair from areas where hair is continuing to grow and placing them in balding areas. 3. Laser Therapy: FDA-approved to treat hereditary hair loss. 4. Lifestyle Changes: Including managing stress, eating a balanced diet, and avoiding tight hairstyles.

    While it’s not always possible to prevent hair loss, some practices can help maintain hair health: 1. Avoid harsh treatments and hair styles that pull the hair 2. Protect hair from sunlight and other sources of UV light. 3. Stop smoking, as it has been linked to baldness. 4. If undergoing chemotherapy, consider a cooling cap to reduce the risk of hair loss.

    Hair loss and baldness can significantly impact an individual’s self-esteem and overall quality of life. Understanding the causes and available treatments is the first step toward managing this condition effectively. It’s crucial for those experiencing hair loss to consult with healthcare providers to determine the underlying cause and appropriate treatment. With the advancements in treatment options, many individuals find relief and satisfactory outcomes in managing their hair loss.

    GENETIC FACTORS IN ALOPECIA AND BALDNESS

    Genetic factors play a pivotal role in hair loss, particularly in the context of androgenetic alopecia, the most common form of hair loss in both men and women. This condition is also known as male-pattern baldness or female-pattern hair loss. Understanding the genetic basis of alopecia involves delving into how specific genes influence hair follicle health, hormone interactions, and ultimately, the hair growth cycle.

    Androgenetic alopecia is highly heritable, meaning it has a strong genetic component. It is polygenic, which means it involves the interaction of multiple genes rather than being traced back to a single gene mutation. The condition is influenced by genes inherited from both parents, although the precise pattern of inheritance and the degree to which genetics play a role can vary between individuals.

    Androgen Receptors (AR) Gene is one of the most significant genes associated with androgenetic alopecia. Located on the X chromosome, this gene codes for the androgen receptor, which interacts with dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a derivative of testosterone. DHT has a miniaturising effect on hair follicles, leading to thinner hair and a shorter hair growth cycle. Variations in the AR gene can increase the sensitivity of hair follicles to DHT, accelerating hair loss. 5-Alpha Reductase Type 2 (SRD5A2) Enzyme is crucial for the conversion of testosterone to DHT. Variations in genes encoding for this enzyme can influence the levels of DHT and thus the extent of its impact on hair follicles. Inhibitors of 5-alpha reductase, such as finasteride, target this pathway to reduce hair loss. Hair Cycle Genes that regulate the hair growth cycle also play a role in androgenetic alopecia. The hair follicle cycles through phases of growth (anagen), regression (catagen), rest (telogen), and shedding (exogen). Genetic factors that disrupt the normal cycle can lead to premature hair loss.

    While genetic predisposition is a key factor, the onset and severity of androgenetic alopecia are also influenced by environmental factors such as diet, stress, and health conditions. This interaction between genetics and environment complicates the prediction and treatment of hair loss.

    Genetic testing can identify individuals at higher risk for developing androgenetic alopecia, allowing for early intervention and personalised treatment plans. However, due to the complex nature of genetic interactions and the influence of environmental factors, these tests cannot predict the condition with absolute certainty.

    Research continues to uncover new genes associated with hair loss and baldness, offering insights into the biological mechanisms behind these conditions. Understanding these genetic factors opens the door to targeted therapies that can more effectively manage or even prevent hair loss. For example, drugs designed to specifically block the action of DHT on hair follicles or to modulate the activity of genes involved in the hair growth cycle represent promising areas of development.

    Genetics plays a crucial role in the development of androgenetic alopecia, with several key genes influencing the sensitivity of hair follicles to hormones, the hair growth cycle, and the conversion of testosterone to DHT. While genetic predisposition is significant, the interplay between genes and environmental factors means that the expression of these genetic tendencies can vary widely among individuals. Ongoing research into the genetic basis of alopecia not only helps in understanding the condition but also in developing targeted treatments that address the specific genetic pathways involved.

    ROLE OF AUTOIMMUNITY IN ALOPECIA

    Autoimmunity plays a significant role in certain types of alopecia, which is a condition characterised by hair loss. There are various forms of alopecia, and among them, alopecia areata is particularly associated with autoimmunity.

    In alopecia areata, the body’s immune system mistakenly attacks the hair follicles, leading to hair loss. This can result in a few bald patches, extensive hair loss (alopecia totalis), or even complete loss of hair on the entire body (alopecia universalis). The autoimmune attack causes inflammation around the hair follicles, preventing them from producing hair. The exact reason why the immune system attacks the hair follicles in alopecia areata is not fully understood, but it’s believed to involve a combination of genetic and environmental factors.

    Other types of hair loss, such as androgenetic alopecia (commonly known as male or female pattern baldness), are primarily due to genetic and hormonal factors rather than autoimmunity. In these cases, the hair loss is caused by the sensitivity of hair follicles to androgens (male hormones), which can lead to thinning hair and eventual baldness in genetically predisposed individuals.

    In the autoimmune mechanism of alopecia, specifically in alopecia areata, the immune system mistakenly targets certain components within the hair follicle, leading to hair loss. The exact autoantigens—that is, the self-proteins recognized as foreign by the immune system—involved in alopecia areata are not completely understood and are an area of active research. However, several potential autoantigens have been proposed based on studies involving patients with alopecia areata and experimental models.

    Trichohyalin is a protein found in the inner root sheath of hair follicles. Some research suggests that it may be targeted by autoreactive T cells in alopecia areata.

    Tyrosine-related Protein-2 (TYRP2) is involved in the pigmentation of the hair and is another potential autoantigen. Mice models have shown that targeting TYRP2 can lead to an alopecia areata-like condition.

    Other hair follicle-associated proteins, not specifically identified, are also thought to be potential targets of the autoimmune response in alopecia areata. These could include various structural proteins and enzymes involved in hair growth and maintenance.

    Since alopecia areata can also affect pigmented cells, melanocyte-associated antigens have been considered potential targets. This is supported by the observation that regrowing hair in alopecia areata often lacks pigment is white or gray initially. Melanocyte-associated antigens are proteins found on the surface of melanocytes, the cells responsible for producing melanin, the pigment that gives color to the skin, hair, and eyes. These antigens can be targeted by the immune system in various autoimmune and inflammatory conditions, as well as in cancer immunotherapy. Their role is particularly highlighted in conditions like vitiligo and melanoma, as well as in alopecia areata when it involves the loss of pigmented hair. Although primarily an attack on hair follicles, alopecia areata can also involve melanocyte-associated antigens, particularly in cases where the regrowth of hair occurs without its natural pigment (resulting in white or gray hair). This suggests that the autoimmune attack may sometimes extend to melanocytes or their associated components within the hair follicle. TYRP1 and TYRP2 enzymes are involved in melanin biosynthesis and are expressed in melanocytes and melanomas. They are potential targets for therapies aiming to modulate the immune response to melanoma. The study and utilization of melanocyte-associated antigens in autoimmune diseases and cancer highlight the importance of understanding immune system interactions with specific cell types. Immunotherapeutic approaches targeting these antigens offer promising treatment avenues alopecia areata.

    The involvement of these autoantigens suggests that the autoimmune response in alopecia areata is quite complex, potentially involving various components of the hair follicle and associated structures. It’s also important to note that the immune response involves both cellular immunity (particularly T lymphocytes) and humoral immunity (antibodies), further complicating the identification of specific autoantigens.

    Research is ongoing to better understand the specific autoantigens and the mechanisms through which they trigger the immune response in alopecia areata. Identifying these components could lead to more targeted therapies for individuals affected by this condition.

    In summary, autoimmunity is a key factor in alopecia areata, causing the immune system to attack hair follicles, but it is not the main cause of all types of alopecia or baldness. Each type of alopecia has its own set of causes and mechanisms, with autoimmunity being significant in some but not all cases.

    ROLE OF ENZYMES

    The pathogenesis of alopecia, particularly androgenetic alopecia (AGA), involves complex biochemical pathways that include several enzyme systems. These enzymes interact with various substrates, and their activity can be modulated by specific activators and inhibitors. Understanding these enzyme systems is crucial for developing targeted therapies for hair loss. Below are the key enzyme systems involved in alopecia and baldness, along with their substrates, activators, and inhibitors.

    15-Alpha Reductase is crucial in the pathogenesis of AGA. It converts testosterone, the primary male sex hormone, into dihydrotestosterone (DHT). DHT is a more potent androgen that binds to androgen receptors on hair follicles, leading to follicular miniaturisation and eventually hair loss. Substrate: TestosteroneActivators: AndrogensInhibitors: Finasteride, Dutasteride

    Aromatase converts androgens into oestrogens. In the context of hair loss, its activity is more significant in women. Higher levels of aromatase in female scalp follicles can lead to lower DHT levels, which may explain the different patterns and severity of hair loss in women compared to men. Substrate: Androgens (Testosterone and Androstenedione). Activators: FSH (Follicle Stimulating Hormone), LH (Luteinizing Hormone). Inhibitors: Aromatase inhibitors (e.g., Letrozole, Anastrozole)

    CYP17A1 (17α-Hydroxylase/17,20-Lyase) is involved in the synthesis of androgens in the adrenal glands and gonads. It catalyses the conversion of pregnenolone and progesterone into precursors of androgens. By influencing the overall levels of androgens, it indirectly affects hair growth and loss. Substrate: Pregnenolone and Progesterone. Activators: ACTH (Adrenocorticotropic Hormone). Inhibitors: Abiraterone

    The balance between these enzyme activities plays a significant role in determining androgen levels in the scalp and systemic circulation, thereby influencing hair growth or loss. For example, elevated activity of 5-alpha reductase increases DHT levels, promoting hair loss. Conversely, higher aromatase activity in women converts more androgens into oestrogens, potentially protecting against extensive hair loss.

    Understanding these enzyme systems has led to targeted treatments for androgenetic alopecia.

    5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors: Drugs like finasteride and dutasteride inhibit 5-AR, reducing DHT levels and slowing the progression of hair loss. These are commonly prescribed for men with AGA and have shown effectiveness in many cases.

    Aromatase Enhancers: Although not a standard treatment for AGA, increasing aromatase activity or oestrogen levels can theoretically benefit hair growth by reducing effective androgen levels.

    Adrenal Androgen Inhibitors: For women, controlling adrenal androgens through inhibitors of CYP17A1 or using oral contraceptives can sometimes manage hair loss by reducing the systemic levels of androgens.

    TYRP1 (Tyrosinase-related protein 1) and TYRP2 (Tyrosinase-related protein 2, also known as DCT, Dopachrome tautomerase) are enzymes that play crucial roles in the melanin biosynthesis pathway, which is responsible for the pigmentation of skin, hair, and eyes. These enzymes are involved in the metabolic pathway that leads to the production of eumelanin, a type of melanin that gives a brown to black color. Understanding their substrates and activators is key to comprehending how pigmentation is regulated and can have implications for conditions like albinism, vitiligo, and the development of pigmented lesions like melanoma.

    TYRP1 Enzyme. Substrate: TYRP1 works downstream of tyrosinase in the melanin synthesis pathway. It helps to oxidize 5,6-dihydroxyindole-2-carboxylic acid (DHICA) into indole-5,6-quinone-2-carboxylic acid. Although it acts mainly to stabilize tyrosinase and prolong its activity rather than directly interacting with specific substrates, its exact substrate specificity beyond its role in melanogenesis is not well-defined. Activators: The activity of TYRP1 is closely tied to the presence and activity of tyrosinase, the primary enzyme in the melanogenesis pathway. Factors that increase tyrosinase activity or expression, such as ultraviolet radiation (UV light), can indirectly increase TYRP1 activity by increasing the substrate availability for melanin synthesis. Additionally, the expression of TYRP1 is regulated at the transcriptional level by various transcription factors involved in melanocyte function, such as MITF (Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor).

    TYRP2 (DCT) Enzyme. Substrate: TYRP2 catalyses the tautomerization of dopachrome, a melanin intermediate, into 5,6-dihydroxyindole-2-carboxylic acid (DHICA). This reaction is a key step in the biosynthesis of eumelanin, contributing to the dark pigmentation. Activators: Similar to TYRP1, TYRP2 activity is also influenced by factors that regulate the overall melanin biosynthetic pathway. UV light can enhance melanin production, indirectly affecting TYRP2 activity by upregulating the melanogenesis pathway. Transcription factors like MITF also regulate TYRP2 expression. Certain hormones and signalling molecules that activate these transcription factors or directly stimulate melanocyte receptors can enhance the expression of melanogenic enzymes, including TYRP2.

    Both TYRP1 and TYRP2 are essential for the proper functioning of the melanin biosynthesis pathway, contributing to the stability, quantity, and quality of melanin produced. Alterations in the activity or expression of these enzymes can lead to pigmentation disorders and affect the vulnerability of skin to UV radiation and oxidative stress. Understanding these enzymes’ regulation can contribute to developing therapeutic strategies for pigmentation disorders and protection against UV-induced damage.

    The biochemical pathways involved in hair loss, specifically through the action of various enzymes, highlight the complex nature of alopecia. By targeting these enzymes, current treatments aim to modulate the hormonal environment of hair follicles, offering hope for managing this challenging condition. Ongoing research into these pathways promises to uncover new therapeutic targets and more effective treatments for those suffering from hair loss.

    ROLE OF HORMONES IN ALOPECIA

    Hormonal imbalances and interactions play a significant role in the development of alopecia and baldness, particularly in conditions like androgenetic alopecia (AGA), which is the most common form of hair loss in both men and women. The primary hormones involved include androgens (such as dihydrotestosterone [DHT] and testosterone), oestrogen, and cortisol. Their molecular targets and mechanisms of action are crucial in understanding the pathophysiology of hair loss and developing targeted therapies.

    Androgens (Testosterone and Dihydrotestosterone [DHT]) is converted to DHT by the enzyme 5-alpha reductase. DHT has a higher affinity for androgen receptors than testosterone and, when bound to these receptors in scalp hair follicles, can alter the normal cycle of hair growth. DHT shortens the growth (anagen) phase and extends the rest (telogen) phase, leading to thinner hair and a receding hairline. Over time, this can result in the miniaturisation of hair follicles and eventual hair loss. Molecular Targets: Androgen Receptors (AR) on hair follicle cells.

    Oestrogens are believed to extend the anagen phase of the hair growth cycle, promoting hair growth and increasing hair density. They may also counteract the effects of androgens by decreasing the expression of androgen receptors in hair follicles or by inhibiting the enzyme 5-alpha reductase, thereby reducing the conversion of testosterone to DHT. The protective effects of oestrogens on hair growth are more evident in women, which is why women generally have less severe patterns of baldness compared to men. Molecular Targets: Oestrogen Receptors (ER) on hair follicle cells.

    Cortisol, known as the stress hormone, can influence hair growth and health. High levels of cortisol can lead to telogen effluvium, a form of hair loss characterised by excessive shedding. Cortisol can negatively impact the hair growth cycle by shortening the anagen phase and prematurely shifting hair follicles into the telogen phase. Additionally, chronic stress and elevated cortisol levels can decrease the proliferation of hair follicle cells and reduce the synthesis of proteins essential for hair growth. Molecular Targets: Glucocorticoid Receptors (GR) on hair follicle cells.

    The interplay between these hormones significantly influences hair growth and loss. For instance, the balance between androgens and oestrogens can determine the health and lifecycle of hair follicles. Hormonal changes, such as those experienced during pregnancy, menopause, or as a result of certain medical conditions, can shift this balance and lead to hair loss or changes in hair density and texture.

    Understanding the hormonal mechanisms behind hair loss has led to targeted treatment options. The use of androgen receptor blockers (such as spironolactone) or 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (such as finasteride and dutasteride) can reduce the effects of DHT on hair follicles, slowing or preventing hair loss in some individuals. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or contraceptives containing oestrogens can sometimes be used to treat hair loss in women, particularly if it’s related to hormonal imbalances. Techniques to reduce stress and lower cortisol levels, including lifestyle modifications, may indirectly benefit hair health by normalising the hair growth cycle.

    Hormones significantly influence hair growth and loss, with androgens, oestrogens, and cortisol playing pivotal roles. Their actions on specific molecular targets within hair follicles dictate the hair growth cycle and can lead to alopecia when imbalanced. Treatments targeting these hormonal pathways can offer hope for those experiencing hair loss, underscoring the importance of hormonal balance in maintaining hair health.

    PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS IN ALOPECIA

    The impact of psychological factors on alopecia and baldness has been an area of growing interest and research, acknowledging the complex interplay between the mind and body in health and disease. Psychological stress, in particular, has been identified as a significant factor that can influence the onset and progression of hair loss. The mechanisms through which psychological factors contribute to hair loss encompass both direct physiological pathways and indirect behaviours that affect hair health.

    Chronic stress can have a direct impact on hair growth and health through several physiological mechanisms.  Chronic stress leads to elevated levels of cortisol, the body’s primary stress hormone. High cortisol levels can shorten the anagen (growth) phase of the hair cycle and prematurely push hair follicles into the telogen (resting) phase, resulting in telogen effluvium, where hair sheds excessively. Stress activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, leading to changes in hormone levels that can affect hair follicle function and health. For instance, fluctuations in hormones like androgens, thyroid hormones, and growth hormone under stress can contribute to hair loss. Psychological stress can dysregulate the immune system, potentially triggering autoimmune conditions like alopecia areata, where the immune system attacks hair follicles, leading to patchy hair loss. Stress and psychological distress can also lead to behaviours that indirectly contribute to hair loss. Stress may lead to poor dietary choices, with inadequate intake of essential nutrients required for healthy hair growth, such as proteins, vitamins, and minerals. Stress and anxiety can trigger compulsive behaviours, including trichotillomania, a condition characterised by the urge to pull out one’s hair, leading to noticeable hair loss. Psychological distress can result in neglect of personal grooming and hair care, contributing to conditions that may exacerbate hair loss, such as scalp infections or damage from harsh hair treatments.

    Depression can also contribute to hair loss, both directly and indirectly. The physiological effects of depression, including altered neurotransmitter levels and hormonal imbalances, can impact hair growth cycles and overall hair health. Additionally, individuals suffering from depression may experience changes in appetite and nutrition, poor sleep, and reduced motivation for self-care, all of which can adversely affect hair health.

    It’s important to note that the relationship between psychological factors and hair loss is bidirectional. Just as psychological stress can contribute to hair loss, experiencing hair loss itself can lead to significant psychological distress, including reduced self-esteem, anxiety, and depression. This can create a vicious cycle where stress and hair loss perpetuate each other.

    Incorporating stress reduction practices, such as mindfulness, meditation, exercise, and adequate rest, can help manage stress levels and potentially mitigate its impact on hair health. Counselling or therapy can provide support for individuals dealing with the psychological impact of hair loss, helping them develop coping strategies and improve their mental health. Encouraging a balanced diet, regular exercise, and good sleep hygiene can help improve overall health and potentially support hair health. In some cases, treating underlying psychological conditions with medications or therapy may indirectly benefit hair health.

    Psychological factors play a significant role in the causation and exacerbation of alopecia and baldness. Recognising and addressing these factors are essential components of a holistic approach to managing hair loss, underscoring the importance of mental health in dermatological conditions.

    HEAVY METALS AND MICROELEMENTS

    The role of heavy metals and microelements (trace elements) in hair health and disorders such as alopecia and baldness is a complex and multifaceted area of study. Both deficiencies and excesses of certain metals and microelements can impact hair growth and health, leading to or exacerbating hair loss. Understanding these relationships is crucial for diagnosing and treating various forms of alopecia.

    Exposure to certain heavy metals, either through environmental sources, occupational hazards, or dietary intake, can negatively affect hair health and contribute to hair loss.

    Chronic exposure to lead can disrupt hormone regulation and damage hair follicles, potentially leading to hair loss. High levels of mercury, often due to consumption of contaminated fish or dental amalgam fillings, can contribute to hair loss by damaging the hair follicles or disrupting protein synthesis. Exposure to arsenic, whether through water or food sources, can cause hair loss, among other health issues, due to its toxicity to organ systems, including the skin and hair follicles. Cadmium exposure can lead to hair loss through its detrimental effects on the kidneys, which play a crucial role in maintaining mineral and hormone balance that affects hair health.

    Microelements, or trace elements, are nutrients required by the body in small amounts to perform various physiological functions, including those related to hair growth and health. Imbalances in these elements can lead to hair disorders. Iron deficiency is one of the most common nutritional deficiencies associated with hair loss, particularly in women. Iron is essential for the production of haemoglobin, which helps supply oxygen to hair follicles. Low iron levels can lead to anaemia, reducing oxygen delivery to the follicles and potentially causing hair loss. Zinc plays a crucial role in hair tissue growth and repair. It also helps keep the oil glands around the follicles working properly. Zinc deficiency can lead to hair loss, while excessive zinc levels can also cause hair loss. Selenium is important for the health of the hair, but an imbalance can contribute to hair loss. High levels of selenium can lead to selenosis, a condition that causes brittle hair and nails, and hair loss. Conversely, selenium deficiency can impair hair growth. Copper peptides are known to stimulate hair follicles and can promote hair growth. However, both copper deficiency and toxicity can affect hair health, influencing hair color and strength.

    Detoxification from heavy metals, when necessary, often involves chelation therapy or other medical interventions to bind and remove the metals from the body. For microelement imbalances, dietary adjustments, and supplementation under medical guidance can help restore levels to a healthy range and potentially address related hair loss. It’s important for these interventions to be carefully managed to avoid creating imbalances that could lead to further health issues. Heavy metals and microelements have significant roles in the health of hair, with both deficiencies and excesses potentially leading to hair loss.

    A high sodium chloride content in the diet even though is not directly linked to causing alopecia or hair loss according to mainstream medical and nutritional research, there are indirect ways in which an excessively high salt diet could potentially influence hair health.  A diet high in sodium can lead to increased blood pressure and possibly reduce blood flow to certain areas, including the scalp. Adequate blood flow is essential for delivering nutrients and oxygen to the hair follicles, which are necessary for healthy hair growth. High salt intake can potentially affect the body’s balance of other minerals, such as potassium and magnesium, which play roles in hair health. An imbalance in these and other nutrients might indirectly influence hair growth and health. Excessive salt consumption can lead to dehydration. Proper hydration is crucial for maintaining the health of hair follicles. Dehydration can lead to dry and brittle hair, which may be more prone to breakage, though this is not the same as affecting hair growth directly from the follicle.

    Phosphoric acid, commonly found in soft drinks and some processed foods as a flavor enhancer or acidity regulator, doesn’t have a direct, widely recognized role in causing hair loss. One of the concerns regarding high intake of phosphoric acid, particularly from cola beverages, is its potential effect on calcium absorption. There’s some evidence to suggest that high phosphoric acid consumption may lower calcium levels, as it could lead to an imbalance between phosphorus and calcium in the body. Calcium is vital for various bodily functions, including hair growth, as it helps in keratinization and in the formation of hair and nails. The effect of phosphoric acid on hair loss would be indirect. Excessive consumption of phosphoric acid might also affect the body’s acid-base balance. While the body’s buffering systems are highly effective in maintaining pH balance, extremely poor dietary habits that favour high intake of acidic substances over alkaline foods can potentially stress these systems.

    Iodine plays a crucial role in the body’s metabolic processes, primarily through its influence on thyroid function. The thyroid gland uses iodine to produce thyroid hormones, which are critical for regulating metabolism, growth, and development. A connection between iodine and hair health exists mainly through the effects of thyroid hormone imbalances on hair growth. An iodine deficiency can lead to hypothyroidism, a condition where the thyroid gland doesn’t produce enough thyroid hormones. Symptoms of hypothyroidism include fatigue, weight gain, cold intolerance, and also hair loss. The hair loss associated with hypothyroidism is typically diffuse, affecting the entire scalp rather than creating bald patches. Beyond just hair loss, hypothyroidism can affect the quality of the hair, making it dry, brittle, and weak. This can further contribute to the appearance of thinning hair. Excessive iodine intake can lead to hyperthyroidism in some individuals, especially those with pre-existing thyroid conditions. Hyperthyroidism is the overproduction of thyroid hormones, which can also cause hair loss, among other symptoms. Excessive iodine consumption can trigger or worsen autoimmune thyroid diseases, such as Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (leading to hypothyroidism) and Graves’ disease (leading to hyperthyroidism). Both conditions can have hair loss as a symptom.

    VITAMINS

    Vitamins play a crucial role in maintaining overall health, including the health of your hair. Adequate intake of specific vitamins is essential for hair growth, strength, and preventing hair loss. Deficiencies in these vitamins can lead to alopecia (hair loss) and, in severe cases, baldness. Here’s a closer look at the role of various vitamins in hair health and how they influence alopecia and baldness:

    Vitamin A is crucial for cell growth, including hair, the fastest growing tissue in the human body. It helps the skin glands produce sebum, an oily substance that moisturises the scalp and helps keep hair healthy. While deficiency in vitamin A can lead to several health issues, including hair loss, excessive intake can also contribute to alopecia. A balanced intake is essential.

    B-vitamins, especially Biotin (vitamin B7), are well-known for their role in hair health. Biotin is used as an alternative hair-loss treatment, though it is most effective in those who are deficient. Other B-vitamins, such as B12, help with the formation of red blood cells, which carry oxygen and nutrients to the scalp and hair follicles, a process crucial for hair growth. Deficiencies in B-vitamins can lead to hair loss. For instance, B12 deficiency is often associated with hair loss in vegetarians and vegans who don’t consume enough B12 sources.

    Vitamin C is a powerful antioxidant that helps protect against the oxidative stress caused by free radicals. Additionally, it is crucial for collagen production and iron absorption, two factors important for hair health. Deficiency in vitamin C can lead to dry, brittle hair, and eventually hair loss.

    Vitamin D’s role in hair production is not fully understood, but receptors in hair follicles suggest its involvement in hair cycle regulation. Low levels of vitamin D are linked to alopecia areata and may be associated with more severe hair loss. Vitamin D deficiency is linked to alopecia areata and may affect hair growth. Supplementation can help improve hair regrowth.

    Similar to vitamin C, vitamin E is an antioxidant that can prevent oxidative stress. Studies have shown that people with hair loss experienced an increase in hair growth after supplementing with vitamin E. While deficiency is rare, lacking vitamin E can lead to oxidative stress, potentially exacerbating hair loss.

    Though not a vitamin, iron’s role in hair health is closely related to that of vitamins. Iron helps red blood cells carry oxygen to your cells, including hair follicles, essential for hair growth and repair. Iron deficiency, which leads to anemia, is a major cause of hair loss, especially in women.

    A balanced diet rich in these vitamins and minerals is essential for maintaining healthy hair and preventing hair loss. While supplementation can help in cases of deficiency, it’s important to consult with a healthcare provider before starting any new supplement regimen, especially since overdosing on certain vitamins (like A and E) can lead to adverse effects, including hair loss. Addressing vitamin deficiencies can significantly contribute to reducing hair loss and promoting hair growth, offering a valuable approach to managing alopecia and baldness.

    PHYTOCHEMICALS

    Phytochemicals are bioactive chemical compounds found in plants that have various health benefits, including potential roles in preventing and treating hair loss (alopecia) and baldness. These natural compounds can influence hair growth and health through several mechanisms, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-androgenic effects. Research into the role of phytochemicals in hair care is ongoing, but some compounds have shown promise in preliminary studies. Here’s a look at how some phytochemicals may help manage alopecia and baldness:

    Polyphenols, found in green tea (especially epigallocatechin gallate or EGCG), berries, and nuts, have antioxidant properties that can help reduce inflammation and combat oxidative stress in hair follicles, potentially promoting hair growth. Green tea polyphenols, for instance, have been shown to stimulate hair growth by prolonging the anagen phase (growth phase) of the hair cycle.

    Sulforaphane, a compound found in cruciferous vegetables like broccoli, has been noted for its ability to up-regulate the production of enzymes that protect cells from oxidative stress and DNA damage. It may also have potential benefits for hair growth by improving the detoxification of harmful substances in hair follicles.

    Quercetin is a flavonoid present in many fruits, vegetables, and grains. It has strong anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. Quercetin can inhibit the production of DHT (dihydrotestosterone), a hormone implicated in androgenetic alopecia, by blocking the enzyme 5-alpha-reductase. It may also protect hair follicles from inflammation and stress.

    Curcumin, the active compound in turmeric, has potent anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. It can help in treating alopecia, particularly forms driven by inflammatory processes, such as alopecia areata. Curcumin’s ability to suppress inflammatory pathways in the body could help reduce inflammation around hair follicles, potentially preventing hair loss.

    Resveratrol, found in grapes, berries, and peanuts, is another polyphenol with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects. It has been suggested to promote hair growth by enhancing the proliferation of dermal papilla cells and could protect hair follicles from damage by oxidative stress.

    Procyanidin, a class of flavonoids found in apples, cinnamon, and grapes, has been shown to promote hair growth. Specifically, procyanidin B2, found in apple skin, has demonstrated the ability to promote hair growth by transitioning hair follicles from the telogen phase (resting phase) to the anagen phase (growth phase).

    While the potential of phytochemicals in treating alopecia and baldness is promising, most of the evidence comes from in vitro studies, animal studies, or small-scale human trials. Therefore, more comprehensive clinical trials are needed to fully understand their effectiveness and safety for hair loss treatment.

    It’s also important to note that while dietary intake of these phytochemicals can contribute to overall health, topical formulations or supplements specifically designed to deliver therapeutic doses directly to the scalp or systemically are typically required to see significant effects on hair growth.

    Phytochemicals offer a promising, natural approach to managing alopecia and baldness. However, individuals interested in using phytochemical-based treatments should consult healthcare providers or dermatologists to discuss the best approach for their specific situation.

    ROLE OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES

    Infectious diseases and the immune response they trigger, including the production of antibodies, can play a significant role in causing hair loss (alopecia) and, in some cases, lead to baldness. The relationship between infections, immune responses, and hair loss is complex and can vary depending on the type of infection and the individual’s immune response.

    Tinea capitis (scalp ringworm) is a common fungal infection of the scalp, primarily affecting children. It can cause patchy hair loss, scaling, and inflammation. The body’s immune response to the fungus can damage hair follicles, leading to hair loss. Tinea capitis, also known as scalp ringworm, is a fungal infection of the scalp that primarily affects children but can also occur in adults. It’s caused by dermatophytes, which are a type of fungi that can invade and grow in the keratin of the skin, hair, and nails. Tinea capitis can lead to a range of symptoms, including scaling, itching of the scalp, hair loss, and the development of bald patches where the hair breaks off at or just above the scalp. In more severe cases, it can lead to inflammation, redness, and the development of tender areas or sores filled with pus (kerions), which can also contribute to scarring and permanent hair loss if not treated properly. Trichophyton tonsurans is the most common cause of tinea capitis in the United States and many other parts of the world, especially in urban areas. Infections with T. tonsurans are typically characterized by black dot ringworm, where hair breaks off at the scalp surface. Microsporum canis species is more common in Europe and parts of Asia and is often associated with pets, especially cats, as a source of infection.  Trichophyton violaceum species is a common cause of tinea capitis in parts of Africa, the Middle East, and India. It tends to cause less inflammatory reactions compared to other species.

    Folliculitis, an infection of the hair follicles caused by bacteria (often Staphylococcus aureus), can lead to inflammation and, if severe, scarring and hair loss. The immune system’s response to the bacteria can exacerbate the damage to hair follicles.

    While the exact cause of alopecia areata is not fully understood, it is believed to be an autoimmune condition where the immune system mistakenly attacks hair follicles. Some evidence suggests that viral infections could trigger this autoimmune response in genetically predisposed individuals.

    Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) can cause various dermatological conditions, including hair loss, due to the virus itself or secondary infections that occur as a result of the weakened immune system.

    Secondary syphilis can cause a diffuse hair loss known as “syphilitic alopecia,” which can appear as moth-eaten alopecia. The immune response to the Treponema pallidum bacterium can contribute to hair loss, which is often reversible with treatment.

    In some cases, infections can trigger an autoimmune response that leads to hair loss. For example, the production of antibodies in response to an infection might cross-react with tissue in the hair follicle, leading to hair loss:

    As mentioned, alopecia areata is an autoimmune condition that can be triggered by viral infections. The body produces antibodies against the hair follicles, mistaking them for foreign pathogens.

    Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that can cause discoid lesions on the scalp, leading to scarring and permanent hair loss. While not directly caused by infectious agents, infections can exacerbate autoimmune conditions like lupus, potentially leading to episodes of hair loss.

    The treatment of hair loss due to infectious diseases and their antibodies primarily involves addressing the underlying infection. Anti-fungal, antibacterial, or antiviral medications can be prescribed depending on the type of infection. For autoimmune conditions like alopecia areata, treatments may include corticosteroids to reduce inflammation and immunotherapy to modulate the immune response.

    In conclusion, infectious diseases and the immune response they trigger, including antibody production, can contribute to hair loss through direct damage to hair follicles or through triggering autoimmune responses. Identifying and treating the underlying infection or managing the autoimmune response is crucial for preventing further hair loss and potentially allowing for hair regrowth.

    ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS IN ALOPECIA

    Environmental factors play a significant role in the health of hair and can contribute to the development of alopecia (hair loss) and baldness. These factors can exert their effects through direct damage to hair follicles, disruption of hair growth cycles, or indirect mechanisms such as influencing hormonal levels or immune responses.

    Understanding the impact of these environmental factors is crucial for developing strategies to prevent and manage hair loss.

    Air pollution, including particulate matter (PM), smoke, and gases like sulphur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), can damage hair follicles. Pollutants can penetrate the scalp and hair, leading to oxidative stress and inflammation that disrupt the normal hair growth cycle and potentially contribute to alopecia.

    Excessive exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun can harm the hair and scalp, leading to hair protein degradation and color changes. UV radiation can also weaken the hair, making it more susceptible to breakage and damage. Furthermore, it can induce inflammation in the scalp, contributing to hair loss.

    Hard water, which contains high levels of calcium and magnesium, along with chlorine in swimming pools, can make hair dry and brittle, increasing the risk of hair breakage. While there’s limited evidence linking hard water directly to alopecia, it can exacerbate existing scalp conditions and affect hair health.

    A diet lacking essential nutrients, vitamins, and minerals can lead to hair loss. For example, deficiencies in iron, zinc, vitamin D, and protein are linked to alopecia.

    Environmental stress, including psychological stress from work or personal situations, can trigger telogen effluvium, a condition where hair prematurely enters the telogen (resting) phase and falls out. Chronic stress can also exacerbate autoimmune conditions like alopecia areata.

    Smoking tobacco can negatively affect the hair growth cycle by reducing blood flow to the hair follicles, leading to nutrient deprivation. The toxins in cigarette smoke can also damage hair follicles and disrupt hair growth.

    Exposure to certain chemicals, such as those found in hair dyes, bleaches, and other hair treatment products, can cause damage to the hair and scalp. These chemicals can lead to allergic reactions, disrupt the natural hair growth cycle, and weaken the hair shaft, leading to hair loss.

    Extreme weather conditions, such as high humidity or dry, cold air, can affect hair health. High humidity can lead to frizz and breakage, while dry conditions can make the hair and scalp dry, leading to dandruff and itchiness, which can exacerbate hair shedding.

    Environmental factors can significantly impact hair health and contribute to the development of alopecia and baldness. While it’s not always possible to completely avoid these factors, understanding their effects can help in adopting protective measures. These can include using hair products that protect against pollution and UV radiation, ensuring a nutrient-rich diet, managing stress, avoiding harmful chemicals, and quitting smoking. Additionally, individuals experiencing hair loss should consult healthcare providers to explore potential environmental causes and develop effective treatment strategies.

    OCCUPATIONAL FACTORS IN ALOPECIA

    Occupational factors can significantly contribute to hair loss (alopecia) and baldness due to various hazards present in the workplace. These factors can range from exposure to chemicals and toxins to physical stress and psychological stress, all of which can potentially affect hair health and growth.

    Many industries use chemicals that, upon exposure, can lead to hair loss. Workers may be exposed to solvents, metals (like lead and mercury), and other industrial chemicals that can harm the hair follicles or disrupt hormonal balances leading to hair loss. Hairdressers and cosmetologists frequently work with hair dyes, bleaches, and perm solutions containing potentially harmful chemicals like formaldehyde, ammonia, and hydrogen peroxide. Prolonged or unprotected exposure can damage the hair and scalp, causing hair loss.

    Jobs that require physical exertion can lead to telogen effluvium, a condition where significant stress on the body pushes more hairs into the resting phase, leading to increased shedding. The physical and psychological stresses experienced by Military Personnel can lead to hair loss. Intense physical training and stress might trigger hair loss in some Athletes.

    Jobs with high stress levels can increase the risk of alopecia. Stress is a well-known trigger for several types of hair loss, including telogen effluvium and alopecia areata. Especially in high-stress environments like emergency rooms or during health crises, and high-pressure roles with tight deadlines and performance pressure in Corporate Jobs can lead to stress-induced hair loss.

    Occupations that involve the risk of physical injury to the scalp can lead to scarring alopecia, where hair loss is permanent due to scar tissue replacing hair follicles. Workers in the nuclear industry or healthcare professionals who frequently use X-rays may be exposed to radiation that can cause hair loss. Protective measures are crucial in these fields to minimise exposure.

    Certain occupations increase the risk of contracting infections that can lead to hair loss. Healthcare Workers exposed to fungal, bacterial, and viral infections can indirectly cause hair loss by affecting the scalp or triggering autoimmune responses.

    Working conditions involving extreme weather or temperatures can also affect hair health. Prolonged exposure to sunlight (UV radiation) and pollutants can damage the hair and scalp of Outdoor Workers.  Workers in Extremely Cold or Hot Environments can lead to dry, brittle hair or exacerbate conditions like seborrheic dermatitis, contributing to hair loss.

    Modern chemical drugs, while designed to treat various medical conditions, can sometimes have side effects, including the causation of alopecia (hair loss) and, in rare cases, contributing to baldness. The impact of these drugs on hair health can vary depending on the type of medication, dosage, duration of treatment, and individual sensitivity.

    Chemotherapy drugs used in cancer treatment are well-known for causing significant hair loss, as they target rapidly dividing cells, including those in hair follicles. This type of drug-induced hair loss is often temporary, with hair usually regrowing after the treatment ends, though sometimes with changes in texture or color. Blood thinners, such as warfarin and heparin, have been associated with hair loss. This side effect is relatively rare and may vary with the dose and duration of treatment Oral Contraceptives and Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) can cause hair thinning or loss in some women, particularly those with a predisposition to hormonal-related hair loss (androgenetic alopecia). Drugs used for treating prostate enlargement or cancer, like finasteride and dutasteride, can also lead to hair loss, though they are sometimes used to treat hair loss at lower doses. Medications used to control seizures, such as valproic acid and phenytoin, can lead to diffuse hair thinning. Certain drugs used to treat depression and bipolar disorder, including lithium and some selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), have been linked to hair loss. Blood pressure medications, particularly beta-blockers (e.g., atenolol) and ACE inhibitors (e.g., lisinopril), can cause hair thinning or loss in some individuals. Drugs containing vitamin A derivatives, used for acne and other skin conditions (such as isotretinoin), can cause hair thinning or hair loss. Long-term use of certain NSAIDs can potentially lead to hair loss, although this is relatively uncommon.

    According to MIT homeopathy approach of therapeutics, molecular imprints or potentized forms of these above said drugs could be used as therapeutic agents, as molecular imprints of disease-causing molecules can act as artificial binding pockets for them.

    The mechanisms by which drugs cause hair loss can include: 1. Anagen Effluvium: Rapid hair loss occurring within days to weeks of drug exposure, affecting hairs in the growth phase. Commonly associated with chemotherapy. 2. Telogen Effluvium: A delay in hair loss until the resting phase of the hair cycle, typically occurring 2-4 months after starting the medication. This is more common with non-chemotherapy drugs and usually results in diffuse thinning that is often reversible. 3. Alteration of Hormonal Balance: Some drugs affect hormonal pathways, leading to hair thinning or loss, particularly in individuals genetically predisposed to hair loss.

    In many cases, hair loss due to medication is reversible upon cessation or adjustment of the drug. However, any changes to medication should always be done under the guidance of a healthcare provider to ensure that the primary medical condition continues to be effectively managed.

    MIT APPROACH TO THERAPEUTICS OF ALOPECIA AND BALDNESS

    DRUG MOLECULES act as therapeutic agents due to their CHEMICAL properties. It is an allopathic action, same way as any allopathic or ayurvedic drug works. They can interact with biological molecules and produce short term or longterm harmful effects, exactly similar to allopathic drugs. Please keep this point in mind when you have a temptation to use mother tinctures, low potencies or biochemical salts which are MOLECULAR drugs.

    On the other hand, MOLECULAR IMPRINTS contained in homeopathic drugs potentized above 12 or avogadro limit act as therapeutic agents by working as artificial ligand binds for pathogenic molecules due to their conformational properties by a biological mechanism that is truly homeopathic.

    Understanding the fundamental difference between molecular imprinted drugs regarding their biological mechanism of actions, is very important.

    MIT or Molecular Imprints Therapeutics refers to a scientific hypothesis that proposes a rational model for biological mechanism of homeopathic therapeutics. According to MIT hypothesis, potentization involves a process of ‘molecular imprinting’, where in the conformational details of individual drug molecules are ‘imprinted or engraved as hydrogen- bonded three-dimensional nano-cavities into a supra-molecular matrix of water and ethyl alcohol, through a process of molecular level ‘host-guest’ interactions. These ‘molecular imprints’ are the active principles of post-avogadro dilutions used as homeopathic drugs. Due to ‘conformational affinity’, molecular imprints can act as ‘artificial key holes or ligand binds’ for the specific drug molecules used for imprinting, and for all pathogenic molecules having functional groups ‘similar’ to those drug molecules. When used as therapeutic agents, molecular imprints selectively bind to the pathogenic molecules having conformational affinity and deactivate them, thereby relieving the biological molecules from the inhibitions or blocks caused by pathogenic molecules.

    According to MIT hypothesis, this is the biological mechanism of high dilution therapeutics involved in homeopathic cure. According to MIT hypothesis, ‘Similia Similibus Curentur’ means, diseases expressed through a particular group of symptoms could be cured by ‘molecular imprints’ forms of drug substances, which in ‘molecular’ or crude forms could produce ‘similar’ groups of symptoms in healthy individuals. ‘Similarity’ of drug symptoms and diseases indicates ‘similarity’ of pathological molecular inhibitions caused by drug molecules and pathogenic molecules, which in turn indicates conformational ‘similarity’ of functional groups of drug molecules and pathogenic molecules. Since molecular imprints of ‘similar’ molecules can bind to ‘similar ligand molecules by conformational affinity, they can act as the therapeutics agents when applied as indicated by ‘similarity of symptoms. Nobody in the whole history could so far propose a hypothesis about homeopathy as scientific, rational and perfect as MIT explaining the molecular process involved in potentization, and the biological mechanism involved in ‘similia similibus- curentur, in a way fitting well to modern scientific knowledge system.

    If symptoms expressed in a particular disease condition as well as symptoms produced in a healthy individual by a particular drug substance were similar, it means the disease-causing molecules and the drug molecules could bind to same biological targets and produce similar molecular errors, which in turn means both of them have similar functional groups or molecular conformations. This phenomenon of competitive relationship between similar chemical molecules in binding to similar biological targets scientifically explains the fundamental homeopathic principle Similia Similibus Curentur.

    Practically, MIT or Molecular Imprints Therapeutics is all about identifying the specific target-ligand ‘key-lock’ mechanism involved in the molecular pathology of the particular disease, procuring the samples of concerned ligand molecules or molecules that can mimic as the ligands by conformational similarity, preparing their molecular imprints through a process of homeopathic potentization upto 30c potency, and using that preparation as therapeutic agent.

    Since individual molecular imprints contained in drugs potentized above avogadro limit cannot interact each other or interfere in the normal interactions between biological molecules and their natural ligands, and since they can act only as artificial binding sites for specific pathogenic molecules having conformational affinity, there cannot by any adverse effects or reduction in medicinal effects even if we mix two or more potentized drugs together, or prescribe them simultaneously- they will work.

    Based on the detailed analysis of pathophysiology, enzyme kinetics and hormonal interactions involved, MIT approach suggests following molecular imprinted drugs to be included in the therapeutics of ALOPECIA AND BALDNESS:

    Dihydrotestosterone 30, Testosterone 30, Trichohyalin 30, Tyrosin related protein 30, ACTH 30, Progesterone 30, Cortisol 30, Thyroidinum 30, Natrum mur 30, Mercurius 30, Arsenic Alb 30, Pumbum Met 30, Cadmium 30, Ferrum met 30,  Acid Phos 30, Iodum 30, Sepia 30, Trichophyton 30, Staphylococcin 30, Trepanoma Pallidum (Syphilinum) 30, Tenia versicolor 30, Hydrogen peroxide 30, Tobacco smoke 30,

    REFERENCES:

                1.         Sinclair, R. (2019). “Alopecia: Classification and pathophysiology.” Journal of Dermatological Science, 96(1), 2-8. This article provides a detailed classification of hair loss types and their pathophysiological mechanisms.

                2.         Paus, R., & Cotsarelis, G. (1999). “The biology of hair follicles.” The New England Journal of Medicine, 341(7), 491-497. Offers an in-depth look at hair follicle biology and its implications for understanding hair growth and alopecia.

                3.         Hamilton, J.B. (1951). “Patterned loss of hair in man; types and incidence.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 53(3), 708-728. Classic study on the genetics and patterns of male pattern baldness.

                4.         Sawaya, M.E., & Price, V.H. (1997). “Different levels of 5α-reductase type I and II, aromatase, and androgen receptor in hair follicles of women and men with androgenetic alopecia.” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 109(3), 296-300. Discusses the role of hormones and enzymes in androgenetic alopecia.

                5.         Trüeb, R.M. (2003). “Association between smoking and hair loss: another opportunity for health education against smoking?” Dermatology, 206(3), 189-191. Explores the link between smoking and increased risk of hair loss.

                6.         Aoi, N., Inoue, K., Chikanishi, T., et al. (2012). “1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 modulates the hair-inductive capacity of dermal papilla cells: Therapeutic potential for hair regeneration.” Stem Cells Translational Medicine, 1(8), 615-626. Investigates the role of vitamin D in hair follicle function and potential therapies.

                7.         Hunt, N., & McHale, S. (2005). “The psychological impact of alopecia.” British Medical Journal, 331(7522), 951-953. A comprehensive review of the psychosocial aspects of living with hair loss.

                8.         Mysore, V., Shashikumar, B.M. (2016). “Guidelines on the use of finasteride in androgenetic alopecia.” Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology, 82(2), 128-134. Guidelines for the use of finasteride in the treatment of hair loss.

                9.         Avci, P., Gupta, G.K., Clark, J., Wikonkal, N., Hamblin, M.R. (2014). “Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) for treatment of hair loss.” Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 46(2), 144-151. Reviews the evidence for low-level laser therapy as a treatment for alopecia.

                10.      Fukuoka, H., Suga, H. (2015). “Hair regeneration treatment using adipose-derived stem cell conditioned medium: Follow-up with trichograms.” Eplasty, 15, e10. An examination of novel treatments for hair loss using stem cell-derived factors.

                11.       Sinclair, R.D., Jolley, D., Mallari, R., Magee, J. (2004). “The reliability of horizontally sectioned scalp biopsies in the diagnosis of chronic diffuse alopecia

                12. Chandran Nambiar KC, www.redefininghomeopathy.com, Fedarin Mialbs,Kannur, Kerala

                13. JH Clarke, A Dictionary of homeopathic materia medica

  • Sankaran’s ‘Sensations-Kingdoms’ Method- Homeopathy Crippled By Lack Of Basic Scientific Awareness

    Corner stone of ‘Sankaran Method’ is classifying drugs into ‘animal’, ‘plant’, and ‘mineral’ kingdoms. Then each kingdom is related with particular group of ‘vital sensations’. Plant remedies are used for individuals having ‘vital sensations’ belonging to the group of ‘sensitivity’, animal remedies are used for those having ‘viatal sensations’ belonging to the class of ‘survival instincts’, and mineral remedies for ‘structural consciousness’.

    First, we have to analyze the concept of ‘remedy kingdoms’. Medicinal properties of any remedy is determined by the chemical structure and properties of the individual chemical molecules they contain. Because, it is individual drug molecules that act upon biological molecules, produce inhibitions, molecular pathology and associated symptoms. During potentization, it is the individual drug molecules that undergo molecular imprinting, and as such, it is the individual molecular imprints that act as therapeutic agents. In the absence of this molecular perspective of our medicinal substances, we fall prey to all sorts of unscientific theories that misguide us gravely.

    Let us consider a particular remedy belonging to plant kingdom. The molecular composition as well as chemical and medicinal properties of the particular drug sample will be decided by various factors. It will contain kingdom-specific, family-specific, species-specific, variety specific, plant-specific and environmental-specific chemical molecules. Part of plant from which the drug substance is extracted is also a decisive factor. Nux vomica tinctures prepared from seeds, fruits, flowers, leaves, bark or root of nux vomica plant will have different molecular composition and medicinal properties. Some molecules will be common to all samples from a particular plant. Certain other molecules will be common to all samples from a particular species. There will be some molecules common to family, as well as some common to plant kingdom as a whole.  Plants belonging to same family will have some common genes, which would produce some similar proteins and enzymes, that would lead to similar molecular processes and synthesis of similar molecules. There would be kingdom-specific, family specific, species specific, variety specific and individual specific and tissue specific chemicals in a plant drug.

    As per this perspective, medicinal properties of a given drug substance of ‘plant kingdom’ will be decided by the collective properties of organ specific, plant specific, variety specific, species specific, family specific and kingdom specific chemical molecules contained in them. It is obvious that it is wrong to think that medicinal properties of a drug substance could be assumed by the ‘kingdom’ to which it belongs.

    This is applicable to all drugs belonging to mineral as well as animal kingdoms.

    When animal or plant substances are disintegrated or divided into individual molecules, they become similar to mineral drugs at molecular level. There are many drugs which could not be included in any particular kingdom. Petroleum is a mineral, but it is the product of disintegration of animal and vegetable matter under ocean beds. Acetic acid is a mineral, but it is prepared from vegetable products. How can we say lactic acid, prepared from milk is plant remedy or mineral remedy? All of us consider calc carb as mineral drug, but exactly it is the ‘middle layer of oyster shells’, and as such, is an animal drug. Kreasote is combination of phenols prepared from wood, and how can we say it is ‘plant’ or ‘mineral’?

    At molecular level, the dividing line between ‘plant, animal and mineral’ kingdoms is irrelevant. It is the molecular structure and chemical properties that decide the medicinal properties. To be more specific, it is the functional groups or moieties that act as decisive factor. Classifying drugs on the basis of ‘kingdoms’ and assigning certain ‘mental level sensations’ to them is totally unscientific and illogical. It illustrates the pathetic level of scientific awareness that rules the propagators of ‘sankaran method’.

    Rajan Sankaran’s ‘sensation’ method is based on the concepts of ‘deeper level vital sensations’ and corresponding ‘remedy kingdoms’. This method has nothing in common with classical homeopathy, where symptoms belonging to mentals, physical generals and particulars, with their qualifications such as causations, sensations, locations, modalities and concomitants decide the selection of similimum.

    According to this theory, ‘structure’ is the basic sensation of ‘minerals’, ‘sensitivity’ is the basic sensation of ‘plants’ and ‘survival’ is the basic sensation of ‘animals’.

    According to this methods, case taking involves an inquiry into ‘deeper levels of consciousness’, by prompting the patient to introspect from ‘symptoms’ into ‘deeper, deeper and still deeper’ levels so that his basic ‘vital sensation’ is explored. Then this ‘vital sensation’ is used to decide the ‘kingdom’ to which the patient belong. Remedies are selected from these ‘remedy kingdoms’.

    The most dogmatic part of this theory is the relating of ‘vital sensation’ with ‘remedy kingdoms’. On what basis sankaran says ‘sensitivity’ is the ‘vital sensation’ of ‘plants’? Any logical or scientific explanation for this relationship? If we go through materia medica of various drugs, we can see many ‘animal’ and ‘minerals drugs’ having sensitivity of high order. How can anybody claiming to be a homeopath ignore the whole drug provings and materia medica to declare that ‘sensitivity’ is the ‘vital sensation’ of ‘plants’ only?

    When a homeopath says ‘sensitivity’ is the ‘vital sensation of plants, it means all plant remedies have produced such a characteristic sensation in healthy individuals during drug proving. To say ‘animal drugs’ have ‘vital sensation’ of ‘survival instinct’, a homeopath should be capable of showing examples from materia medica to justify that statement. Same with ‘vital sensations’ of mineral drugs. Our materia medica does not show that only ‘plant drugs’ produced ‘sensitivity’ in provers.  We can see many ‘animal’ and ‘mineral’ drugs with high order of ‘sensitivity’.  If not from materia medica, where from Dr Sankaran ‘invented’ that ‘vital sensation’ of ‘sensitivity’ is the basic characteristic of ‘plant kingdom’?

    See the rubric ‘sensitive’ in ‘mind’ of kent repertory:

    [Kent]Mind : SENSITIVE, oversensitive:- Acon., Aesc., Aeth., Alum., Am-c., Anac., Ang., Ant-c., Apis., Arg-n., Arn., Ars., Ars-i., Asaf., Asar., Aur., Bar-c., Bell., Bor., Bov., Bry., Calc., Calc-p., Calc-s., Camph., Cann-s., Canth., Carb-an., Carb-s., Carb-v., Cast., Caust., Cham., Chin., Chin-a., Chin-s., Cic., Cina., Clem., Cocc., Coff., Colch., Coloc., Con., Crot-h., Cupr., Daph., Dig., Dros., Ferr., Ferr-ar., Ferr-p., Fl-ac., Gels., Gran., Hep., Hyos., Ign., Iod., Kali-ar., Kali-c., Kali-i., Kali-n., Kali-p., Kali-s., Kreos., Lac-c., Lach., Laur., Lyc., Lyss., Mag-m., Med., Meph., Merc., Mez., Mosch., Nat-a., Nat-c., Nat-m., Nat-p., Nat-s., Nit-ac., Nux-v., Ph-ac., Phos., Plat., Plb., Psor., Puls., Ran-b., Sabad., Sabin., Samb., Sanic., Sars., Seneg., Sep., Sil., Spig., Stann., Staph., Sulph., Tab., Teucr., Ther., Thuj., Valer., Verat., Viol-t., Zinc.

    In this list, 46 remedies belong to ‘mineral kingdom’: alumina, ammo carb, antim crud, arg nit, ars, ars iod, aur, baryta, borax, calc, calc phos, calc sulph, carb sulph, causticum, cupr, ferr, ferr ars, ferr ph, fl acid, hep, iod, kali group, mag mur, mercury, natrum group, nit acid, phos acid, phos, platinum, plumbum, sanicula, silicea, stannum, suplh, zinc

    12 remedies are from ‘animal kingdom’: Apis, cantharis, carb an, crot h, lac can, lach, med, moschus, psorinum, sep, theri.

    Remaining 56 remedies are of ‘plant kingdom’.

    On what basis sankaran says ‘sensitivity’ is the ‘vital sensation’ of plant kingdom? How can anybody say persons who are ‘sensitive’ at the deeper’ level need ‘plant remedies only? How can this theory be called homeopathy?

    Similarly, if we examine various rubrics belonging to ‘survival’ instinct, or ‘structural’ sensations, we can see they are not limited to animal or mineral remedies only. Many ‘plant remedies’ have such symptoms.

    According to Rajan Sankaran, FEAR is the indication of VITAL SENSATION of ‘survival instincts’ which need an ANIMAL KINGDOM drug. Based on which materia medica rajan sankaran says ‘vital sensation’ of ‘fear’ indicates only ‘animal kingdom remedy’?

    Please see the MIND rubric FEAR in Kent Repertory:

    [Kent]Mind : FEAR:- Absin., Acet-ac., Acon., Aeth., Agar., Agn., Aloe., Alum., Am-c., Anac., Ang., Ant-c., Ant-t., Arg-n., Ars., Ars-i., Asaf., Aur., Bapt., Bar-c., Bar-m., Bell., Bor., Bry., Bufo., Cact., Calad., Calc., Calc-p., Calc-s., Camph., Cann-i., Cann-s., Caps., Carb-an., Carb-s., Carb-v., Cast., Caust., Cham., Chin., Chin-a., Chlor., Cic., Cimic., Coca., Coc-c., Cocc., Coff., Coloc., Con., Croc., Crot-h., Cupr., Daph., Dig., Dros., Dulc., Echi., Elaps., Eupho., Ferr., Ferr-ar., Ferr-p., Form., Gels., Gent-c., Glon., Graph., Hell., Hep., Hydr-ac., Hyos., Hyper., Ign., Iod., Ip., Kali-ar., Kali-br., Kali-c., Kali-i., Kali-n., Kali-p., Kali-s., Lach., Lil-t., Lob., Lyc., Lyss., Mag-c., Mag-m., Manc., Meli., Merc., Merc-i-r., Mez., Mosch., Mur-ac., Murx., Nat-a., Nat-c., Nat-m., Nat-p., Nat-s., Nicc., Nit-ac., Nux-v., Onos., Op., Petr., Phos., Phyt., Pip-m., Plat., Psor., Puls., Ran-b., Raph., Rheum., Rhod., Rhus-t., Rhus-v., Ruta., Sec., Sep., Sil., Spig., Spong., Squil., Stann., Staph., Stram., Stront., Stry., Sul-ac., Sulph., Tab., Tarent., Thuj., Til., Valer., Verat., Zinc.

    See. 75 drugs belong to PLANT KINGDOM! 54 are MINERAL drugs! Only 9 ANIMAL drugs! How Rajan Sankaran say only ANIMAL drugs are indicated for ‘vital sensation’ of ‘survival instincts’? By this approach, the practitioner who looks only ‘animal’ drugs is actually deprived of a large number of drugs belonging to other ‘kingdoms’, one of which may be the real similimum.

    There may be many patients ‘sensitive at deeper levels’ who may require ‘animal’ or ‘mineral’ drugs if we select drugs using homeopathic method of totality of symptoms. Limiting all ‘sensitive’ patients to ‘plant kingdom’ remedies may be detrimental in such cases.

    Rajan Sankaran says FEAR is the expression if ‘vital sensation of survival instincts’ which the ‘theme’ or quality of ‘animals’. As such, sankaran method uses only ‘animal remedies’ for people exhibiting ‘deep seated’ fear.

    Homeopathic understanding of medicinal properties of drug substances are based on symptoms produced in healthy individuals during drug provings. Those symptoms are listed in our materia medica and repertories. We similimum by comparing symptoms of patients with symptoms of drugs, which is the basis of our therapeutic principle ‘similia similibus curentur’.

    Please go to KENT REPERTORY> MIND > FEAR: Aconite, Argentum Nit, Aurum, Bell, Borax, Calc Phos, Calc, Carb sulph, Cicuta, Digitalis, Graphites, Ignatia, Kali Ars, Lyco, Lyssin, Nat Carb, Phos, Platina, Psor, Sepia and Stram are the drugs listed with THREE MARKS under FEAR.

    As per homeopathic method of similimum being selected on the basis of our materia medica, these are the prominent drugs to be considered in patients with characeristic sensation of FEAR.

    But, according to sankaran, FEAR indicates ‘vital sensation’ of ‘survival instincts’, which needs ‘animal remedies’ only. Only animal remeies found in above list are Lyssin, Psorinum and Sepia. Homeopaths practicing sankaran method will obviously ignore all other drugs in this list, since they are not ‘animal remedies’. Does this approach strengthen homeopaths, or debilitate them?

    I want to know, from where sankaran got the idea that only ‘plant remedies’ have ‘fear’ and ‘survival instincts’? Which drug proving? Which materia medica? A person cannot claim to be homeopath by ignoring all available homeopathic literature on materia medica, and producing materia medica and symptoms from his fancies.

    Some people claim, sankaran’s concepts are based on his ‘observations’. Did he conducted drug provings of all drugs and ‘observe’ their symptoms? Did he prove the symptoms given in our materia medica are not reliable? Which proving showed him sepia, lyssin and psorinum has more ‘fear’ than phos, bell, stram or arg nit?

    Would Sankaran say a homeopath cannot cure a patient having ‘survival insticts’ and ‘fear’ using phosporous or stramonium, if they turn out to be similimum on the basis of totality of symptoms. Should we avoid phos, since it is not an ‘animal drug’?

    Please see following rubrics:

    [Kent]Mind : FIGHT, wants to:- Bell., Bov., Hipp., Hyos., Merc., Sec.

    [Kent]Mind : QUARRELSOME:- Acon., Agar., Alum., Ambr., Am-c., Anac., Anan., Ant-t., Arn., Ars., Aster., Aur., Bar-c., Bell., Bor., Bov., Brom., Bry., Calc., Calc-s., Camph., Canth., Caps., Caust., Cench., Cham., Chel., Chin., Con., Cor-r., Croc., Crot-h., Cupr., Dig., Dulc., Elaps., Ferr., Ferr-ar., Fl-ac., Hipp., Hyos., Ign., Ip., Kali-ar., Kali-c., Kali-i., Lach., Lepi., Lyc., Lyss., Merc., Merl., Mez., Mosch., Nat-a., Nat-c., Nat-m., Nat-s., Nicc., Nit-ac., Nux-v., Olnd., Pall., Petr., Ph-ac., Phos., Plat., Plb., Psor., Ran-b., Rat., Rheum., Ruta., Seneg., Sep., Spong., Stann., Staph., Stram., Stront., Sul-ac., Sulph., Tarent., Thea., Thuj., Til., Verat., Verat-v., Viol-t., Zinc.

    According to sankaran, ‘quarelling’ and ‘fighting’ indicates ‘survival instincts’, which require ‘animal remedies’.

    Under the rubric “Mind : FIGHT, wants to”, not a single ‘animal remedy’ is seen, except hipp.

    Under ‘quarrelsome’, ambra, asterias,cantharis, cenchris, corralium, crotalus, elaps, hipp, lach, lyssin, psor, sep, spong, and tarent are the animal remedies.

    Would you say, all remedies other than these ‘animal remedies’ should be eliminated while selecting a similimum for this patient?

    According to sankaran, JEALOUSY is a ‘vital sensation’ of ‘ANIMAL KINGDOM’.

    See this rubric:

    [Kent]Mind : JEALOUSY:- Anan., Apis., Calc-p., Calc-s., Camph., Cench., Coff., Gall-ac., Hyos., Ign., Lach., Nux-v., Op., Ph-ac., Puls., Raph., Staph., Stram.

    LACHESIS and HYOS are 3 marks drugs for this symptom. Only APIS, CENCHRIS, and LACHESIS are ‘animal’ drugs’. Anan, Camph, Coff, Hyos, Ign, Nux, Opium, Puls, Raph, Staph and Stram are ‘plant remedies’. Calc P, Calc S, Gall ac and Phos ac are mineral drugs.

    We will have to eliminate HYOS when searching a similimum for a person with jealousy as a prominent symptom, if we follow sankaran method!

    Homeopathic materia medica or repertory does not support sankaran’s theory that persons with ‘vital sensation’ of ‘jealousy’ would require ‘animal drugs’ only.

    Sankaran says LACK OF SELF CONFIDENCE indicates a vital sensation of ‘structural consciousness’, which is a MINERAL quality. Only ‘mineral drugs’ have to be considered for patients exhibiting ‘vital sensation of LACK OF SELF CONFIDENCE.

    See this rubric in kent repertory:

    [Kent]Mind : CONFIDENCE, want of self:- Agn., Alum., Anac., Anan., Ang., Arg-n., Aur., Bar-c., Bell., Bry., Calc., Canth., Carb-an., Carb-v., Caust., Chin., Chlor., Dros., Gels., Hyos., Ign., Iod., Kali-c., Kali-n., Kali-s., Lac-c., Lach., Lyc., Merc., Mur-ac., Nat-c., Nat-m., Nit-ac., Nux-v., Olnd., Op., Pall., Phos., Plb., Puls., Ran-b., Rhus-t., Ruta., Sil., Stram., Sul-ac., Sulph., Tab., Ther., Verb., Viol-t., Zinc.

    Only ANACARDIUM is 3 marks drug for this symptom. It is a PLANT REMEDY!

    24 drugs- Agnus, Anac, Anan, Ang, Bell, Bry, Carb v, China, Dros, Gels, Hyos, Ign, Lyc, Nux V, Oleand, Opium, Puls, Ran b, Rhus t, Ruta, Stram, Tab, Verb and Viol t are PLANT REMEDIES.

    5 drugs- Canth, Carb an, Lac can, Lach and Ther are ANIMAL DRUGS.

    23 drugs- Alum, Arg Nit, Aur, Bar c, Calc, Caust, Chlor, Iod, Kali c, Kali n, Kali s, Merc, Mur ac, Nat c, Nat m, Nit ac, Pall, Phos, Plumb, Sil, Sul ac, Sul and Zinc are MINERAL DRUGS.

    Materia medica or repertories no way justify sankaran’s theory that LACK OF SELF CONFIDENCE would require only MINERAL REMEDIES. How can a person claiming to be homeopath make a theory and method of practice totally ignoring our whole materia medica and drug proving?

    Sankaran’s reputation, experience or vast followings should not prevent us from asking genuine questions. We need answers for these questions, since sankaran claims to be a homeopath.

    Sankaran’s method will result in gravely disabled in incapacitated homeopathic practice, preventing homeopaths from utilizing the unlimited potentials of our materia medica.

    Obviously, the basic dogma of ‘sensations-kingdom’ relationship on which ‘sankaran method’ is built up, lacks the support of logic or materia medica.

    Anybody can make any theories. But it is wrong to say it is homeopathy.

    Rajan Sankaran gives a case of ‘tumor in eye ball’ cured by ‘argentum nit’ as an example of successful employment of his ‘sensation method’:

    “I had a case of a man with a tumor in his eyeball, and he described it thus; that this tumour caused a certain “imbalance” in his eyes. Then he described this imbalance as a sense of inco-ordination, and further, how co-ordination was the most important thing in his life; how everything needed to be co-ordinated. Going further along this line, he said it’s the kind of co-ordination that a pilot needs when piloting his plane, or a rocket scientist needs when he makes a rocket. It’s the kind of co-ordination that an actor needs when he is performing live on stage, and several such examples.”

    “At some point, he described a situation where his mother-in-law did something behind his back, and when I asked him what he had felt about it, he replied that he felt very disappointed, and betrayed. Now, these emotions of disappointment and betrayal are present in his case, and one might be tempted to use rubrics like “ailments from disappointment, or betrayal”. But if you ask further, “Describe the disappointment”, then you bring out the true individuality of the person in the circumstance. When somebody does something behind your back, which is not expected, the feeling of disappointment is common, not individual. Hahnemann always emphasized the individualizing phenomena, the characteristic symptoms.”

    “Here, when we look at disappointment, it’s not individual enough, not characteristic enough. Go further. When I asked him, “Describe the disappointment”, he said, “It’s as if somebody had punched me in my stomach.” This now gets more characteristic. Take it one step further. I asked him, “Describe the experience of being punched” and he said, “I feel completely suffocated.” “Describe suffocation.” And it opens out and you find that there is the suffocation sensation in many areas in his life, like when swimming, or in claustrophobic situations, etc. That suffocation sensation, along with the sense of importance of co-ordination and control, like a stage artist, or a plane pilot, gives us the remedy Argentum nitricum, which has the control, co-ordination as well as the suffocation. That remedy cured the tumour in his eye.”

    “So the “ailments from disappointment” or “delusion that somebody had punched his stomach”, is a more superficial expression. The deeper expression is the tremendous sense of suffocation that he felt, not only in the situation with his mother-in-law, but in every area of his life. A sensation that is so individual, and so completely unconnected with the external reality that it becomes the most individualizing symptom of the person, both physical and mental. It is at the Sensation level.”

    MY COMMENTS ON THIS CASE:

    When we analyze, this case, we would realize that sankaran did not utilize his ‘kingdom approach’ in this case. He does not say ‘argentum nitricum’ was selected as a ‘mineral drug’, as he normally does. Instead, he says “suffocation sensation, along with the sense of importance of co-ordination and control, like a stage artist, or a plane pilot, gives us the remedy Argentum nitricum, which has the control, co-ordination as well as the suffocation. That remedy cured the tumour in his eye.

    Rajan Sankaran, being a very experienced physician having mastered the materia medica and successfully treated thousands of cases in his practice, could rightly select ‘arg nit’ as the correct similimum from symptoms such as ‘general sensation of suffocation’, ‘sensation of incordination’, and of course, from other numerous symptoms and observations he would have collected during case taking but opted to give in his case report.

    Can any less experienced follower of sanakaran, with lesser materia medica knowledge, ever select ‘arg nit’ as the similimum of this patient, on the basis of ‘suffocation’ and ‘incoordination’ only, and a knowledge that patient needs a ‘mineral drug’ as per sankaran’s theory? Please note, Sankaran does not mention ‘kingdom’ while explaining this case.

    Any homeopath who knows how to take case, repertorize and decide a similimum using materia medica, could have very easily selected ‘arg nit’ in this case by classical method in a very simple way.

    Since the patient is coming with ‘tumor in eye’, an ordinary homeopath would start case taking by collecting symptoms with ‘eye’ and ‘vision’, trying to collect all modalities, sensations and concomitants associated with ‘eye’ and ‘vision’.

    The ‘incoordination’ in eyes sankaran talks about will have to be probed in detail, to know whether it is problems of accommodation(accommodation defective), dimness of vision, diplopia, moving vision, alternate vanishing of vision or anything like that. Remember, all these problems of vision could be seen in materia medica of ‘arg nit’ in high order. Observe whether there is any chemosis, echymosis, lachrymation, pain, swelling, or any other peculiar sensations in eyes, with their modalities. Sensation of fullness in eyes, strbismus, cold-heat modalities also have to be ascertained. Itching, discoloration, frequent wiping, and many such features could be observed.

    After completing ‘particulars’, physician would inquire mentals and physical generals. What sankaran interprets as ‘suffocation’ would be described by the patient as aggravation in closed room, desire for open air, aggravation in crowded rooms, general physical anxiety, sensation of balls internally, intolerance of clothing, sensation of being constricted by a band around body, and such symptoms. See, most of these symptoms strongly indicate argentum nitricum.

    Regarding his mentals, from what sankaran explained, we can understand there would be symptoms such as persistent anxiety, despair, feeling of betrayed, sadness, anticipations, confusion of mind, being repudiated by relatives, dwelling on past bad experiences, delusions of getting punched, forsaken feelings, mortification and many such symptoms, most of which obviously points to argentum nitricm.

    For an experienced homeopath like sankaran, arg nit is the obvious prescription for this case without any special methods and techniques or even repertorization. Any homeopath who could collect these symptoms would reach argentum nit through simple repertorization. As for me, I would have reached arg nit by the time I complete my case taking.

    Why should Rajan sankaran pretend to be finding similimum in this type of obvious cases through his ‘sensation-kingdom’ method, only to confuse youg homeopaths?

    That is the game plan of all modern gurus and masters. They would prescribe correctly using their materia medica knowledge and, make results. Then they would pretend the made this miraculous results using their ‘special methods’ they are marketing! Innocent follower is betrayed, and his carrier doomed to be spoiled, by keeing on trying the ‘methods’ the guru taught them.

    As part of my mission to evolve and promote scientific homeopathy, I will have to discuss and analyse various existing theories about homeopathy. I will have to point out things I think are not agreeing with modern scientific knowledge system. Such criticisms and discussions are part of work I am engaged in. It is nothing personal. I have no any personal agenda here. I analyse and expose each and every ideas, concepts and methods in homeopathy that hinder scientific transformation of homeopathy.

    Earlier, once I took up discussing Dr Vijaykar’s theories, ‘cubs’ and ‘lions’ of that group threatened me for my life. They told me ‘you will have no place to run’. Next came the attacks from marketers of ‘hair transmissionis’. Promoters of ‘energy medicine’ theories also did the same. Homeopathic World Community removed all my articles from their pages, since they could not tolerate my exposures of ‘international masters’ who promote homeopathy as ‘energy medicine’ and practice homeopathy as part of their CAM ‘healing arts’. I had to relinquish my HWC membership on that issue.

    Now, it is the turn of disciples of Rajan Sankaran and Jan Scholton. Once I just took up discussing ‘sensation method’, ‘kingdom method’ and ‘periodical table method’, a whole hornet’s nest is infuriated and out for me. I wanted to discuss their theories due to my conviction that scientific homeopathy cannot advance without exposing these highly influential but unscientific theories. My message box is daily full of messages warning me of ‘dire consequences’. Instead of discussing or explaining the points I raised, I am abused, threatened and asked to ‘stay away from our master’. I am accused of being jealous, arrogant, insane and working with hidden personal agendas. They diagnosed my problem as ‘severe skepticemia’!

    I just don’t care. I will go on with my mission of evolving homeopathy into a full-fledged medical science. I know I will have to pay a price, perhaps with my life itself. But I am not bothered. Let the dogs bark, caravan will move on!

    Without criticizing and exposing wrong ideas and wrong practices, we cannot evolve and promote right ideas and right practices in homeopathy.

    I am asked to ‘read all books of sankaran, and apply it myself’ to confirm, before commenting on his theories. I agree that we have to study before commenting or criticizing anything. But, we need not ‘apply’ everything ourselves to ‘confirm’. If that were so, nobody will have the right to comment on homeopathy without practicing it. We cannot criticize allopathy without practicing it ourselves! To criticize astrology, I will have to practice astrology. To say robbery is wrong, I will have do robbery myself! To criticize corruption, I have to be corrupt? To comment on a theory, we have to ‘study’ it well, that is all.

    I have commented on sankaran’s theories after studying it well. I need not practice it for that.

    When anybody say only ‘animal drugs’ have to be used in people characterized by ‘vital level sensation of survival instincts’, I can comment on it on the basis of my knowledge of materia medica and drug proving. I need not ‘apply’ that method. I know many homeopathic drugs belonging to plant or mineral kingdoms having that charecteristics. I have applied those drugs in my homeopathic practice very successfully. Any homeopath, who has studied and applied materia medica knows that sankaran is wrong on this point.

    Some friends have expressed their apprehension that criticizing wrong theories and practices happening in homeopathy in public will harm the good will and reputation of our community and our therapeutic system.

    I do not subscribe to that view. All these ‘wrong things’ in homeopathy are done and promoted by their propagators in public, with out any concern about the harm they are doing, through articles, books, interviews and seminars all over the world, making homeopathy a topic of unending mockery before the scientific community. All these things are already known to general public better than homeopaths themselves.

    These people have already done enough damage to homeopathy through their unscientific theories and nonsense practices. They supply arms and ammunition to skeptics to attack homeopathy. There is no meaning in covering up this dirt. Public dirt should be washed in public, to get the lost reputation and credibility of homeopathy back.

    If homeopathic community continue let these people go like this, we cannot even dream about making homeopathy a scientific medical system, and get it recognized as such even in a far distant future.

    In his Homeopathic Links interview, Vithoulkas says: “Sankaran alone has done more harm to homeopathy than all the enemies of homeopathy together.”

    Andre Saine writes on his website: “Sankaran demonstrated several basic errors of methodology and reasoning in his example of how he ‘discovers’ a remedy”

    How would the followers of Sankaran respond to these statements?

    Collect all mentals, physical generals and particular symptoms of your patient, with all qualifications such as causations, sensations, locations, modalities and concomitants. Then grade the symptoms into uncommon, common, mental, physical general and particulars. Then repertorize. Compare the materia medica of drugs coming top in repertorization, and decide a similimum. That is the simple way of homeopathic practice- and the most successful way.

    If a drug is similimum according to totality of symptoms, it does not matter whether that drug belongs to animal, mineral or plant kingdoms. It does not matter to which ‘sub kingdom’ or ‘family’ the drug belongs. Such a knowledge does not make any difference in your similimum.

    Selecting similimum is most important in homeopathy. Similarity of symptoms is our guide in selecting similimum. All these talk about ‘kingdoms’, sub kingdoms, families and such things only contribute in making homeopathy complex, and confuse the young homeopaths. It may help in creating an aura around the teacher, which would attract people to seminars. That is not a silly thing, where money matters above homeopathy!

  • Molecular Imprinted Drugs Will Provide A Converging Point For Homeopathy And Modern Molecular Medicine

    In a far distant historical perspective, I foresee the possibility of converging of modern medicine and homeopathy into a universal molecular medical science of ‘drug-less therapy’, where only molecular imprints will be used as therapeutic agents.

    Modern Medicine is gradually evolving into ‘Molecular Medicine’. Molecular Medicine studies vital processes and diseases at molecular level, and deals therapeutics as an art and science of molecular level repairing.

    Molecular medicine is the most advanced, most scientific and most recently originated discipline in modern medical science. It is a broad field, where physical, chemical, biological and medical techniques are used to describe molecular structures and mechanisms, identify fundamental molecular and genetic errors of pathology, and to develop molecular interventions to correct those errors.

    ‘Molecular Medicine’ emphasizes disease and cure in terms of cellular and molecular phenomena and interventions rather than the conceptual and observational focus on patients and their organs common to conventional medicine.

    Molecular Medicine studies drug substances in terms of their molecular level structure and organization, and is more and more relying upon target-specific Designer Drugs synthesized by drug designing technology, supported by computer aided designing protocols.

    Drug Designing Technology has recently started exploring the possibilities of Molecular Imprinting in the development of target-specific designer drugs. They are now experimenting for developing bio-friendly imprinting matrices and imprinting protocols, so as to prepare artificial binding surfaces for pathogenic molecules that could be utilized as therapeutic agents.

    Even though not yet recognized as such, homeopathic potentization is a process of molecular imprinting, where artificial binding sites for pathogenic molecules are produced by imprinting drug molecules into water-ethyl alcohol supra-molecular matrices. Homeopathy identifies pathological molecular errors and selects the appropriate molecular imprints through a peculiar technique of ‘comparing symptoms’, which is expressed as the therapeutic principle, ‘simila similibus curentur’

    Most probably, modern molecular medicine and drug designing technology is in the new future going to explore the possibilities of water as a molecular imprinting medium as part of their search for novel substances to be utilized as imprinting matrix.

    It means, Modern Molecular Medicine is slowly advancing towards the realization of a drug designing technology that homeopathy invented as ‘potentization’ and utilized for preparing therapeutic agents 250 years ago. It is based on this understanding that I try to propagate the concept that ‘Homeopathy is Molecular Imprinting Therapeutics- An Advanced Branch of Molecular Medicine.

    In a far distant historical perspective, I foresee the possibility of converging of modern medicine and homeopathy into a universal molecular medical science of ‘drug-less therapy’, where only molecular imprints will be used as therapeutic agents. Instead of our present ‘potentization’, modern science may develop more sophisticated ways of molecular imprinting, that would enable us to produce therapeutic agents more specific and perfect than our present day ‘potentized drugs’.

    May be be distant dream. But it is a dream based on scientific knowledge.

  • ‘Drug Proving With High Potency Drugs’- A ‘Belief’ Never Verified By Well-Organised Experiments

    Homeopaths have many deep-rooted ‘beliefs’- most of them very irrational and unscientific. But I am sure, they cannot be convinced by talking logic or science that goes against such beliefs.

    Homeopaths ‘believe’ that ‘highly potentized’ drugs can produce symptoms, and can be used for ‘drug proving’. They believe it is dangerous to use potentized drugs without indications.

    One homeopath claimed: “I once took a dose of medhorrinum 1M, because I really wanted to know more about Homeopathy, and I got a date of symptoms for some time (a month or less), most corresponded well to the set of symptoms described in materia medica for medhorrinum… So you say that high dilutions is not good for experimentations…. I think it is not correct…”

    Pure rubbish. If he wanted to “know more about homeopathy”, this is not the way he should do experiments. Taking oneself ‘single dose’ of a drug and waiting for ‘its symptoms’ to appear! And he got symptoms of that drug for one month! And he considers he has ‘proved’ that “high dilutions are good for experimentation” beyond any doubt!

    If he really wanted to ‘prove’ that potentized drugs can produce symptoms, he should conduct the experiments according to scientific method. Person who is subjected to experiment should not know which medicine he is taking. Person conducting the experiment should not know which drug is given to which individual. There should be enough controls also. Then we should try to identify the drugs from comparing the symptoms produced with symptoms in materia medica. Only when we succeed in identifying drugs from symptoms in such a well controlled blinded experiment, we can say we ‘proved’ that high potency drugs could produce symptoms.

    Taking a dose of ‘known’ drug oneself, waiting for its symptoms for one month, and ascribing all symptoms you produced during one month to that single drug- it is a joke. After taking that ‘single dose’, he will be ‘taking’ diverse types of exogenous molecules into your body- through food, water, drinks, air and many many other environmental factors. All those molecules can produce symptoms in him. How can he say all symptoms produced for one month ‘after’ a ‘single dose of medorrhinum 1m’ were due that ‘single dose’?

    Only homeopaths, blinded by ‘beliefs’ can make such claims. For them, everything that happens ‘after’ their dose is the ‘effect’ of that dose! They never bother to consider the variables involved! I know it is a waste of time arguing to convince them. They cannot be convinced by logic or science. They are ‘believers’.

    Homeopathic drugs potentized above avogadro limit (12c) contain only ‘molecular imprints’. Molecular imprints are supramolecular nanostructures formed by hydrogen bonding of ethyl alcohol-water molecules, into which the 3-dimensional configuration of drug molecules are imprinted as nano-cavities. These nano-cavities can act as artificial binding sites for endogenous or exogenous molecules having configurational similarity to the molecules used for imprinting. We can say, molecular imprints are ‘artificial key-holes’ for pathogenic molecular keys.

    Biochemical processes involves two aspects: 1.Binding of ligands to targets, which is determined by configurational affinity.2. Chemical transformation, which is determined by charge affinity of ligands and targets. Since ‘molecular imprints’ have only ‘configurational affinity’, without any ‘charge affinity’ towards biological molecules, potentized drugs cannot interfere in normal biological processes.

    Molecular imprints contained in the potentized homeopathic preparations bind to ligands or biological molecules merely due to their complementary cofigurations without any charge affinity, whereas natural ligands bind to their biological target molecules in capacity of their appropriate spacial configurations as well as charge affinities. So, the bindings of molecular imprints with biological molecules or their ligands will be very temporary and cannot stay long. Such bindings of molecular imprints cannot replace the natural ligand-target interactions happening as part of vital processes. Molecular imprints can not compete with natural ligands in binding to their natural biological targets. Hence it is obvious that potentized homeopathic preparations cannot interfere in biological ‘ligand-target’ processes such as ‘substrate-enzyme’, ‘antigens-antibodies’, ‘signal-receptor’ etc. As such, chances of potentized homeopathic medicines acting as pathological agents are very rare even if used indiscriminately. Molecular imprints can interfere only in interactions between pathogenic molecules and biological molecules, as well as off-target bindings of ligands with biological molecules, where only configurational affinity is involved. Obviously, molecular imprints can act upon only the molecular blocks created by exogenous or endogenous foreign pathological molecules.

    Molecular imprints contained in the potentized homeopathic preparations cannot successfully compete with natural ligands in binding with their biological target molecules, and hence, cannot interfere in the interactions between biological molecules and their natural ligands. Obviously, potentized drugs cannot produce any pathological molecular inhibitions in the organism or produce symptoms.

    According to scientific view, ‘Similia Similibus Curentur’ means: ‘diseases caused by specific molecular inhibitions and expressed through specific groups of subjective and objective symptoms can be cured by potentized forms of drugs that could create similar pathologic molecular inhibitions and symptoms in healthy individuals if applied in crude form’. Same can be stated in a different way as: “pathological molecular inhibitions can be rectified using ‘molecular imprints’ of drug molecules that can create similar molecular inhibitions if applied in molecular form”.

    Homeopathy utilizes ‘drug proving’ for studying the pathogenic properties of drug substances by observing their capacity to produce various pathological symptoms in healthy organisms. Homeopathy is based on the principle that a substance becomes a medicinal agent only because it has some disease-producing properties. In other words, if we could know what pathological inhibitions and symptoms a drug can create in healthy organism, we can decide in what disease states that drug could be used as a therapeutic agent in potentized form. Drug proving is unique to homeopathy. Whereas modern medicine studies the disease-curing properties of drugs, homeopathy studies the disease-producing properties of drugs. That makes a great difference.

    Drug proving is done by administering small quantities of a particular drug to controlled volunteer groups of apparently healthy individuals. The subjective and objective symptoms, representing the diverse molecular deviations caused in the organism by the drug substance are carefully observed and recorded. These symptoms are systematically arranged compiled as materia medica of the substance used.

    Let us examine what actually happens at molecular level during drug proving:

    First point we have to note is that most drug substances, especially of vegetable or animal origin, are not ‘simple’ substance. Even if we use them as a ‘single’ substance, actually they consist of diverse types of individual molecules. A substance can interact with biological molecules only as individual molecules. If we really want to understand homeopathy and drug proving scientifically, we should first of all learn to perceive drug substance in terms of its diverse constituent molecules. Once we introduce a sample of drug substance into the living organism for ‘proving’, its constituent molecules are instantly subjected to various processes such as disintegration, ionization, hydration and certain chemical transformations.
    Individual constituent molecules are carried and conveyed through blood and other internal transport systems into the cells and body fluids in different parts of the body. They can interact with various enzymes, receptors, and other biological molecules inside the organism. Individual drug molecules, in capacities of their molecular affinities, get themselves bound to various bio-molecules which participate in the essential biochemical activities in the organism. These interactions are decided and directed by the specific properties such as configurations and charges of active groups of individual drug molecules, and their specific affinity towards biological target molecules.

    The three dimensional structure of the individual drug molecules, and that of the concerned bio-molecules are the decisive factors in this process of formation of molecular binding between them. This peculiarity is called molecular affinity. It is very important to note that drug substances interact with different biological molecules, not as a singular entity, but as individual constituent molecules and ions. These individual drug molecules and ions are capable of competing with natural ligands and substrates in binding to their biological targets, thereby inhibiting the essential bio-chemical processes which can take place only with their presence and mediation. Such molecular inhibitions in various bio-chemical pathways result in a condition of pathology, expressed in the form of a train of subjective and objective symptoms, due to the involvement of various neuro-mediator, neuro-transmitter and cellular signalling systems.

    From this point of view, drug proving has to be done using molecular forms of drugs, since only they can produce real pathological molecular inhibitions in the organism.

    Let us examine what actually happens when potentized drugs are administered into ‘apparently’ healthy individual individuals for drug proving. First point we need to remember is that ‘apparently’ healthy people will not be totally free from pathological molecular inhibitions. There will be diverse types of hidden molecular errors existing in them, arising from diverse types of factors such as nutritional, environmental, miasmatic, genetic, emotional, metabolic, infectious and others. When potentized drugs are introduced into the body, some or other molecular imprints contained in them may act upon these existing molecular inhibitions, which may be reflected as some transient symptoms. Actually, those symptoms are not indicating the ‘disease producing’ properties, but ‘diseases curing’ properties of concerned drugs. As such, symptoms obtained from drug proving using high potencies may confuse our materia medica.

    Potentized drugs may act on ‘healthy’ organism by a different mechanism. Molecular imprints may bind to the natural ligands in the body, if they have any configurational affinity. But, such bindings will not lead to a state of pathology since molecular imprints cannot interfere in the interaction between natural ligands and targets which will have stronger affinity to each other. As such, symptoms appearing from such interactions will be very much temporary, and cannot be considered ‘pathological symptoms’.

    Drugs potentized above 12c cannot cause pathological molecular inhibitions or produce symptoms. As such ‘drug proving’ with ‘high potencies’ is only a myth- ab false belief that is deep-rooted in the minds of homeopaths.

  • Confusions Created By Proponents Of Energy Medicine Over The Concept Of ‘Molecular Imprints’

    The term ‘molecular imprints’ is now almost hijacked by the proponents of all diverse shades of unscientific ‘energy medicine’ and ‘spiritual’ theories about homeopathy. It makes distinguishing between scientific and unscientific approaches very hard.

    The term ‘molecular imprinting’ and ‘molecular imprints’ originally comes from polymer chemistry, where these terms are used to describe a technique of creating template-shaped cavities in polymer matrices with memory of the template molecules, to be used as artificial molecular recognition sites.

    This technique is based on the system used by enzymes for substrate recognition, which is called the “lock and key” model. The active binding site of an enzyme has a unique geometric structure that is particularly suitable for a substrate. A substrate that has a corresponding shape to the site is recognized by selectively binding to the enzyme, while an incorrectly shaped molecule that does not fit the binding site is not recognized.

    In a similar way, molecularly imprinted materials are prepared using a template molecule and functional monomers that assemble around the template and subsequently get crosslinked to each other. The functional monomers, which are self-assembled around the template molecule by interaction between functional groups on both the template and monomers, are polymerized to form an imprinted matrix. They are known in the scientific community as a molecular imprinted polymer (MIP). Then the template molecule is removed from the matrix under certain conditions, leaving behind a cavity compl ementary in size and shape to the template. The obtained cavity can work as a selective binding site for a specific template molecule.

    I have been using the concepts of ‘molecular imprinting’ and ‘molecular imprints’ to explain homeopathic potentization in this scientific perspective. My contention is that water has polymer-like properties at supramolecular level, and as such, water can be used as molecular imprinting medium exactly similar to other polymer substances. During potentization, three dimensional configuration of drug molecules are imprinted as nanocavities into the hydrogen-bonded supra-molecular networks of ethyl alcohol-water matrix. These ‘molecular imprints’ or ‘hydrosomes’ can act as ‘artificial binding sites’ for the drug molecules used for imprinting, as well as to pathogenic molecules having similar configurations. Active principles of potentized drugs are these ‘molecular imprints’.

    This is the scientific understanding of ‘molecular imprinting’ and ‘molecular imprints’.

    Now, the proponents of ‘energy medicine’ theories are trying to hijack this scientific concept to promote their pseudo-scientific theories. They talk about ‘molecular imprints’ of ‘drug energy’ and even ‘spiritual energy’. They talk about ‘molecular imprinting’ of ‘thoughts’ into water. According to them, ‘molecular imprints’ act by ‘emitting’ ‘radiations’, ‘waves’, ‘resonance’ and such things. They mix up ‘molecular imprinting’ with ‘water memory’ theories of people like Emotto, Chaplin and Rustum Roy. Their theories have nothing in common with the scientific concepts of ‘molecular imprinting’.

    Anyhow, these people create a lot of confusions during our discussions about scientific homeopathy. To avoid confusions, now I prefer to use the term ‘hydrosomes’ instead of ‘molecular imprints’, to indicate ‘molecular imprinted nanocavities of water acting as artificial molecular binding sites’.

    Modern biochemistry explains molecular mechanisms of disease and cure in terms of ‘key-lock’ relationship between ligands and their target molecules. This ‘key-lock’ concept has been proved right by the preparation and use of target specific designer drugs. Any scientific explanation we provide for molecular mechanism of homeopathic therapeutics involved in ‘similia similibus curentur’ should be fitting to this ‘key-lock’ concept of molecular interactions. My explanation of of homeopathy on the basis of ‘molecular imprints’ or ‘hydrosomes’ acting as ‘artificial binding sites for pathogenic molecules’ perfectly meets this fundamental condition.

  • You Have The Right To Practice Any Occult You Like- But Don’t Say It Is Homeopathy!

    One senior homeopath friend commented on my discussions regarding ‘energy medicine theories of homeopathy’:

    “In fact I treat my patients with energy medicine apart from Homoeopathy and magnetic therapy. Energy medicine is there and practiced from 4000 years and Homoeopathy is 250 years old. Study some more and learn to know before commenting on any subject. 4000 years back no labs, no trials, still medicine was being given in many ways and patients were being treated too. Just because you would not believe energy medicine, you cant call it funny and mock at it. Energy medicine is having its own value and such comments would not change its place in the Universe. Never think you can attack somebody like this and you do not have any right to discuss the unknown subject in the group.”

    My friend is gravely mistaken. I am not discussing the “”value” or ‘efficacy’ of energy medicine. Nor its historical relevance. I am not interested in ‘knowing’ it. I would not question anybody’s right to practice ‘energy medicine’, ‘magnetotherapy’ or anything like that “apart” from homeopathy. It is up to you to decide what you should practice.

    I was commenting on the widely propagated theory that “homeopathy is energy medicine”. In that case, it is a different matter. I did not criticize ‘reflexology’ per se; I criticized the method of selecting similimum using reflexology David Little talk about. I have nothing if anybody practice radionics or dowsing; but when somebody theorizes about using radionics machines to select homeopathic drugs, I have the right to comment. The age old occult practice using hair as as medium existed here since antiquity. I am not bothered. But when somebody talks about homeopathic drug transmission to distance through hair, and conducts courses and seminars for homeopaths on that topic, it becomes a matter of concern for every homeopath. I am not bothered about the ‘water memory’ theory of Emoto or Rustom Roy. But when a homeopath claims he writes name of homeopathic similimum on paper, keeps it under a glass of water to ‘charge’ it and treats his patients with that ‘charged water’, you should not expect me me to keep silent. When a reputed homeopathy claims he recorded the homeopathic drug information as mp3 file and cured AIDS by playing it to patients, you have no right to ask me to keep mum.

    Anybody can practice any occults or woodoo as he like “apart” from homeopathy, if law permits a ‘physician’ to do so. I don’t bother. But when you make homeopathy “part” of your occult practices, and spin ‘ultra-scientific’ theories about homeopathy to justify such practices, I have the right to intervene and comment. I am bothered only about homeopathy- not about your ‘energy medicine’ or occults. You keep them “apart”, I will not “attack” you.

    Whether anybody is practicing or propagating CAM, ENERGY MEDICINE, FAITH HEALING or anything else is not my concern. It is for the law-enforcing authorities to decide whether a HOMEOPATH registered under the provision of CCH Act is permitted to engage in such practices ‘along’ with homeopathy. I do not intend to comment on it. I am questioning the widely propagated theory that ‘homeopathy is energy medicine’. I am questioning the practice of ‘homeopathic occults’ such as homeopathic drug transmission through hair, homeopathic drug transmission through photographs, mp3 file transmission, selecting similimum by radionics machine, dowsing and reflexology, and such things which gravely damage the scientific credentials of homeopathy. I object only when you make homeopathy a PART of ‘energy medicine’. Homeopathy is purely a method of ‘drug therapy’- not energy medicine or spiritual healing. Homeopathy should be understood, explained and practiced a MEDICAL SCIENCE. Homeopaths should be scientific medical professionals.

    Regarding my “right to discuss the unknown subject in the group”, I would like to reserve my comments for the time being, hoping not to spoil our friendship. I expect you would discuss only “known” subjects hereafter.

  • Homeopathy is ‘Medical Science’. Say ‘No’ To ‘Energy Medicine’ Theories!

    I constantly try to expose all those ‘big’ people who are propagating homeopathy as a branch of ‘energy medicine’ or ‘spiritual healing’, not due to any personal vendetta. Actually, I do not know these people personally. I do this campaign as part of my mission of advancing homeopathy as a full-fledged ‘medical science’, which I think, cannot be achieved without freeing it from malignant influence of diverse shades of ‘energy medicine’ theories and their highly influential international propagators.

    We cannot hope to advance homeopathy as a scientific medical practice unless we could explain ‘potentization’ and ‘similia similibus curentur’ in a way fitting to modern scientific paradigms, and prove them according to scientific methods. If you are genuine in this mission, you cannot move forward without settling accounts with pseudo-scientific ‘energy medicine concepts’ that have engulfed homeopathy.

    Actually, ‘energy medicine’, energy therapy or energy healing is a branch of complementary and alternative medicine basically distinct from homeopathy. It is based on the belief that a healer is able to channel healing energy into the person seeking help by different methods: hands-on, hands-off, and distant (or absent) where the patient and healer are in different locations. There are various schools of energy healing. It is known as biofield energy healing,spiritual healing, contact healing, distant healing, therapeutic touch, Reiki or Qigong. Spiritual healing is largely non-denominational and traditional religious faith is not seen as a prerequiste for effecting a cure. Faith healing, by contrast, takes place within a religious context.

    Homeopathy is essentially a form of ‘drug therapy’. It has nothing to do with ‘energy medicine’. Homeopathy should be understood, explained and practiced as a scientific medicine.

    ‘Homeopathy is energy medicine’- this theory is intentionally propagated world over by proponents of diverse colors of occult and pseudo-scientific practices destroying the scientific credentials of homeopathy. They spin fanciful theories about homeopathy using ‘vibration theory’, ‘bio-magnetism’,’wave theory’, ‘electro-magnetic radiations’, ‘frequencies’, ‘resonance theory’, ‘piezo-electricity’ and various other absurd theories, pretending themselves to be ‘ultra-scientific’. These people are gravely alienating homeopathy from mainstream scientific knowledge system.

    Along with homeopathic practice, these people are actually doing spiritual healing, psychic healing, Therapeutic touch, Healing Touch, Esoteric healing, Magnetic healing, Qigong healing, Reiki, Pranic healing, Crystal healing, distant healing, intercessionary prayer, Acupuncture, biofield energy healing,spiritual healing, contact healing, distant healing and various other occult practices. They prefer to call themselves as CAM practitioners. That is why they want to include homeopathy in the category of ‘energy medicine’, and try to explain homeopathy in that terms.

    These people propagate hair transmission, telephone transmission, photo transmission, mp3 file transmission, telepathy, radionics, dowsing, spiritual homeopathy and such things in the name of homeopathy.They have great influence and dominance in international homeopathy.

    A very special convenience of ‘energy medicine’ is, they can fit any scientific knowledge into their ‘theoretical system’. They can connect everything using their magic wands- ‘‘electromagnetic radiations’ and ‘bio-magnetic resonance’!

    According to them, homeopathic medicines act by ‘resonance’, nanoparticles act by ‘resonance’, ‘ghost dna’ act by ‘resonance’. Everything is ‘energy’. Life is ‘resonance’, disease is lack of ‘resonance’, cure is re-establishment of ‘resonance’. Even cells and genes interact through ‘resonance! ‘Everything could fit comfortably well into this ‘resonance’ theory- let it be homeopathy, faith healing, acupressure, distant healing, radionics, dowsing, hair transmission, touch healing, mesmerism, prayers, pranic, reiki or any occult practice. ‘Radiations’ and ‘Resonance’explains everything.

    Once you accept ‘energy medicine’ theory, everything is easy. You become a ‘healer’- not ‘physician’. You need not bother about learning difficult subjects such as biochemistry, genetics, anatomy, physiology, pathology, pharmacology, diagnosis, materia medica, similimum or anything else! You need not study biological molecules, drug molecules or their chemical interactions. Simply find out where the ‘resonance’ is missing, and re-establish ‘resonance’ using appropriate ‘healing methods’. You can use anything as therapeutic agents- your hands, charged water, dynamized drugs, prayers, healing touch, suggestions, mind power, magnets, hair, nail, excreta! It is a comfort zone for lazy and ignorant people who desire to be ‘healers’. If you are not willing to learn science, or if you do not understand science, be a proponent of ‘energy medicine’!

    If you genuinely want homeopathy to be a real ‘medical science’, it is inevitable that you will have to fight for freeing homeopathy from the influence of ‘energy medicine’ theories and associated occult practices. I take up this fight as part of my mission of propagating scientific homeopathy. Kindly do not minimize it into an issue of ‘personality clashes’ or ”ego conflicts.

  • Dana Ullman- Foremost Spokesman Of Pseudo-scientific ‘Energy Medicine’ Theories of Homeopathy

    In his eagerness to defend  his most cherished ‘nanopharmacology’ concept, and to utilize it to provide a scientific glare to his ‘energy medicine’ theories, respected Dana Ullman now gives a new twist to nanoparticle theory of IIT scientists.

    He says: “It doesn’t necessarily assert that it is the nanoparticles that have ALL of the impact. It could also mean that the nanoparticles change the entire sovent (the water medium)”

    This is really a new contribution from dana ulman to nanoparticle theory. But it makes the whole puzzle more mysterious and complex, which is the actual intention of dana. By this statement, he is trying to utilize the ‘nanoparticle theory for justifying the most pseudoscientific ‘energy medicine theories’ in homeopathy’, of which he is a prominent proponent along with his CAM counterparts.

    By this statement, he is trying to say that nanoparticles are not the real active principles of potentized drugs that makes “all impacts”, but they ‘change the whole solvent’ by inducing it to ‘vibrate’ exactly similar to ‘vibrations of drug substance’, and that these ‘immaterial dynamic vibrations’ are the active principles of potentized drugs! He would also say, these ‘vibrations’ will act upon ‘vital force’ in a ‘dynamic way’ by ‘resonance’ and produce cure!

    SEE how cleverly the ‘energy medicine’ proponents twist and convert the nanoparticle theory proposed by IIT scientists in a way fitting to their pseudoscientific ‘dynamic energy- vibration-resonance-vital force’ frame work!!

    His statement makes it very much obvious that dana ulmann and his ‘energy medicine’ friends are ‘supporting’ nanoparticle theory not to rationally resolve the riddles of homeopathy and make it more scientific, but hoping to utilize it to provide a ‘scientific’ glare to their nonsense ‘vibration’ theories.

    Dana Ullman, who is claimed to be described by TIME magazine as “the Leading Proselytizer of Homeopathy” and ABC News touted as “Homeopathy’s Foremost Spokesman”, is a prominent proponent of ‘ultra-scientific’ ‘energy medicine’ theories in homeopathy that severely discredit the scientific credentials of homeopathy.

    Please read his articles on his site and try to understand what he says about the mechanism of homeopathic drug action. He has no opinion of his own. He will quote many others, and say ‘it is said’, ‘it is believed’. He never commits to any theory. Same time, all  articles of Dana Ulman have an undercurrent of ‘energy medicine’ theories.

    Energy medicine theory is the greatest enemy of scientific homeopathy. Scientific community will never accept homeopathy as a medical science, if we go on talking ‘energy medicine’. We have to use the paradigms of science, language of science, concepts of science, terms of science, methods of science. We should explain homeopathy as a science, fitting to modern biochemistry, molecular biology and pathology.

    Dana Ulmann would be the first person to write articles supporting any emerging theories or new research reports appearing in homeopathy. As I already said, he instantly ‘supports’ every new theories, but commits to nothing. If you ‘accept’ a theory in its real sense, you will have to discard and disown its contradicting theories. Ulmann will ‘support’ molecular imprints, next day he will write an article supporting ‘energy medicine’ theories. Next day he will support nanoparticle theory. The moment the IIT B research report appeared in media, he wrote an article declaring ‘homeopathy is nanopharmacology’, same time adding that ‘nanopaticles’ act by ‘vibrations’ and ‘resonance’! It is a wonderful exercise. He never goes into the depth of any theory. He only quote others. His all articles always contains ‘it is said’ and ‘it is believed’. He ‘says’ nothing specific. He never antagonize any theory directly, but very cleverly utilize every new ‘researches’ to justify the ‘energy medicine concepts.

    The flag-ship article of his website  “Why Homeopathy Makes Sense and Works-A Great Introductory Article for Advocates OR Skeptics of Homeopathy” clearly shows that he is is totally blank on “How Homeopathy Works”.

    He admits “precisely how homeopathic medicines work remains a mystery according to present scientific thinking”. If it is a mystery, how could he claim it is “nano-pharmacology”?

    In this article, he says homeopathy uses “nanodoses” of medicinal substances. Either he has no idea about what “nano” means, or he is not aware that drugs potentized above 12c or avogadro number cannot contain a single drug molecule. How can something that does not contain a ‘single’ molecule be ‘nano-doses’ of drug substance? To be “nano-doses”, there should be drug molecules present!

    In the same article, Ulmann says Homeopathy works on the basis of ‘hormesis’. Hormesis is all about the biological actions of ‘small’ quantities of drugs. How could Ullman talk about hormesis knowing well that potentized drugs contain no drug substance? If you accept homeopathy as hormesis, you are obviously discarding the principles of homeopathic potentization. Homeopathy is not SMALL doses- it is NO doses!

    DANA ULLMAN SAYS:  “One metaphor that may help us understand how and why extremely small doses of medicinal agents may work derives from present knowledge of modern submarine radio communications. Normal radio waves simply do not penetrate water, so submarines must use an extremely low frequency radio wave. However, the terms “extremely low” are inadequate to describe this specific situation because radio waves used by submarines to penetrate water are so low that a single wavelength is typically several miles long! If one considers that the human body is 70-80% water, perhaps the best way to provide pharmacological information to the body and into intercellular fluids is with nanodoses. Like the above mentioned extremely low frequency radio waves, it may be necessary to use extremely low (and activated) doses as used in homeopathic medicines, in order for a person to receive the medicinal effect.”

    SEE ANOTHER ‘METAPHOR’:  “It is commonly known that certain species of moths can smell pheromones of its own species up to two miles in distance. It is no simple coincidence that species only sense pheromones from those in the same species who emit them (akin to the homeopathic principle of similars), as though they have developed exquisite and specific receptor sites for what they need to survive and to propagate their species. Likewise, sharks are known to sense blood in the water at distances, and when one considers the volume of water in the ocean, it becomes obvious that sharks, like all living creatures, develop extreme hypersensitivity for whatever will help ensure their survival. It is therefore not surprising that renowned astronomer Johann Kepler once said, “Nature uses as little as possible of anything.”

    These are a very ‘funny’ metaphors only ‘Ulmanian logic’ can decipher relating with ‘how homeopathy works’.!

    In the article “Nobel Prize-Winning Virologist’s New Research Gives Significant Support to Homeopathic Pharmacology” Ullman claims that Luc Montaigner’s researches using ‘aqueous dilutions’ of bacterial DNA supports homeopathic potentization, even though “homeopathy is not mentioned anywhere” by Montaigner. But Ullman conveniently ignores the fact that Montaigner never used dilutions above 12x, which is very much lower to avogadro limit. Upto 23x, there is always chance for original molecules to be present. Montaigner even said he could not detect any ‘electromagnetic signals’ above 18x. How can Ullman claim Montaigner proved the efficacy of ‘high dilutions’ used in homeopathy?

    For my appraisal of Montaigner’s observations, go to this link: http://dialecticalohmeopathy.wordpress.com/2011/09/27/luc-montagniers-observations-of-ultra-dilutions-and-its-implications-on-homeopathy/

    Dana is never bothered or does not notice the fact that Montaigner’s ‘ghost dna’ theory and nanoparticle theory of IIT-B team contradict each other!. He ‘supports’ both theories!. That is a very special quality of Dana- he can support and promote any number of contradicting theories same time, without any ‘partiality’.  He commits to nothing. He would connect any contradicting theories using his ‘energy medicine’ theories of ‘electromagnetic radiations’ and ‘biomagnetic resonance’!  According to him, homeopathic medicines act by ‘resonance’, nanoparticles act by ‘resonance’, ‘ghost dna’ act by ‘resonance’. Life is ‘resonance’, disease is lack of ‘resonance’, cure is re-establishment of ‘resonance’. Everything could fit well into this ‘resonance’ theory- let it be homeopathy, faith healing, distant healing, radionics, dowsing, drug transmission or any occult practice. ‘Resonance’ and ‘radiations’ is the answer.

    In his article “Homeopathic Medicine is Nanopharmacology”, Dana Ullman answers the question “How does homeopathy work” as follows:

    “How homeopathic medicines work is presently a mystery. And yet, nature is replete with striking examples of the powerful effects of extremely small doses of active agents.

    It is commonly known that certain species of moths can smell pheromones of its own species up to two miles away. Likewise, sharks are known to sense blood in the water at large distances.

    I stress again that nanopharmacological doses will not have any effect unless the person is hypersensitive to the specific medicinal substance. Hypersensitivity is created when there is some type of resonance between the medicine and the person. Because the system of homeopathy bases its selection of the medicine on its ability to cause in overdose the similar symptoms that the sick person is experiencing, homeopathy’s “law of similars,” as it is called, is simply a practical method of finding the substance to which a person is hypersensitive.

    The homeopathic principle of similars makes further sense when one considers that physiologists and pathologists now recognize that disease is not simply the result of breakdown or surrender of the body but that symptoms are instead representative of the body’s efforts to fight infection or adapt to stress. Fever, inflammation, pain, discharge, and even high blood pressure are but a small number of the common symptoms that the organism creates in order to defend and to try to heal itself.

    Over 200 years of experience by homeopathic physicians hav found that a homeopathic medicine acts longer and deeper when it is more potentized. Although no one knows precisely why this happens, it is conjectured that highly potentized nanopharmacological doses can more deeply penetrate cells and the blood-brain barrier than less potentized medicines. Although there is no consensus on why these ultramolecular doses work more deeply, there is consensus from users of these natural medicines that they do.

    One cannot help but sense the potential treasure-trove of knowledge that further research in homeopathy and nanopharmacology will bring in this new millennium.”

    ————————————————————————————————-

    I GOT NOTHING. DID DANA ANYWHERE PROVIDE ANY STRAIGHT ANSWER TO THE QUESTION ‘HOW HOMEOPATHY WORKS? ANYBODY GOT ANY IDEA?

    Only thing I got is he explains “law of similars,” as “simply a practical method of finding the substance to which a person is hypersensitive”, and this “hypersensitivity is created when there is some type of resonance between the medicine and the person”. According to Dana that is how homeopathy works- “resonance between medicine and person”! He pretends to be talking science by saying ‘homeopathy is nanopharmacology’, whereas his ‘nano-pharmocology’ has nothing to do with modern nanotechnology or pharmacology.  His ‘nano pharmacology’ acts by resonance!

    That is the wonderful quality of Dana Ullman’s writings. He talks a lot, he writes a lot- of course in a very knowledgeable and ‘scientific’ language. But nobody gets nothing from him. Everything begins in mystery and ends in mystery.

    And you should know, he is “the Leading Proselytizer of Homeopathy” and “Homeopathy’s Foremost Spokesman” in western world”!

    My request to Dan Ullman is, he should be a little more cautious and consistent  while explaining homeopathy. Being the most noted  “Foremost Spokesman” of homeopathy, he should be more responsible. While saying homeopathy is ‘hormesis’, ‘small doses’ and ‘nanopharmacology’, he should be aware that he is contradicting the concept of homeopathic potentization. He should try to explain how potentized drugs, even without a single drug molecule contained them, act therapeutically on the basis of ‘similia similibus curentur’. Any reasonable theory about homeopathy should explain what actually happens during potentization, what are the active principles of potentized drugs, and what is the exact molecular mechanism by which these active principles produces a therapeutic effect. We should explain potentization and similia similibus curentur in a way fitting to modern scientific knowledge. Most importantly, we should be consistent in our explanation, whatever it be.

    Dana Ullman should always remember, there is an elite and skeptic  scientific community keeping watchful eyes on whatever he says. He should be cautious not to provide new arms and ammunition to them to attack homeopathy, by making inconsistent and self-contradicting statements and promoting obviously unscientific theories about homeopathy.

    I would expect Dana Ulman to provide specific answers to following direct questions, if he is serious in his inquiry ‘how homeopathy works’

    1. What exactly happens during potentization? What is the exact process involved?

    2. What are the active principles of potentized drugs?

    3. What is the exact process by which these active principles of potentized drugs interact with the organism and produce a therapeutic effect?

    4. How would you explain ‘similia similibus curentur’ in the light of your understanding of potentization and therapeutic action of potentized drugs?

  • SEE HOW OUR “STALWARTS” MAKE HOMEOPATHY AN UTTER NONSENSE!

    See the real face of international ‘scientific homeopathy’, and its ‘modern masters’! They write books, conduct courses, seminars and interviews to train new generation of homeopaths. They are ‘most revered’ teachers and gurus. They represent homeopathy in international platforms. Nothing to wonder scientific community dismisses homeopathy as ‘fake’, ‘superstitious beliefs’ and ‘quackery’! No wonder James Randy and his skeptic friends rocking!

    DAVID LITTLE is a prominent face of international homeopathy, who founded
    H.O.E. (Homoeopathic Online Education) selling a four year online course on homeopathy. David has been practicing Homoeopathy for the past 30 years.He claims to be providing “valuable knowledge of the true methods of Homoeopathy, so that it can be used in a safe and effective manner”

    “David Little was born in the USA in 1948 and has been a student of Homœopathy since the early 1970s. His first teacher was the late, great Dr. Manning Strahl and he was a colleague of the late Dr. Harimohan Choudhury. He has studied Homoeopathy in the USA and India. He started HOE, Homeopathic Online Education in 1999”.

    Leela D’Souza, who conducted an interview of DAVID LITTLE for Hpathy introduces him: “All of us who know you, admire your work for homeopathy and many have established a strong foundation in their homeopathic journey participating in your course and receiving guidance from you”.

    SEE WHAT DAVID LITTLE TEACHES ABOUT USING REFLEXOLOGY IN SELECTING SIMILIMUM AND POTENCY:

    “Through skillful reflex testing the homoeopath is able to communicate directly with the vital force by learning its language. We can ask the vital force what it wants through reading the reaction of the autonomic nervous reflexes to the stimuli caused by homoeopathic remedies. In this way we can know if a remedy is going to react before we give it! It can also help us to find the correct potency to use. This certainly is a great advantage. This can most easily be done by observing the pupil reflex, the pulse and respiration, palpating and percussing the chest and abdomen, and testing the galvanic skin response with a dielectric substance on the skin of the patient.”

    “All of these effects are the reaction of the autonomic nervous system to the radiations of energy waves from the homoeopathic remedy. In fact many of these reflexes will react before the vial is actually brought into contact with the patient”.

    SEE DAVID LITTLE EXPLAINING HOW TO USE ‘PUPIL REFLEX’ FOR SELECTING SIMILIMUM:

    “Once the is patient is relaxed and ready the operator shines the light into the person’s eyes. If one is using a shaded light it should be held no higher than the waist and suddenly turned upward so that the light shines into the patient’s eyes. If one is using a flashlight it should be held to the side and directed into the patient’s eyes from one to two feet away. The pupils will immediately contract and then after one or two seconds dilate slightly and come to rest. At this moment the assistant should come up behind the patient and with a quick movement bring the remedy close to the person’s body or lightly touch them. If the homoeopath is working alone they may bring the remedy very close or lightly touch the remedy to the hand of the patient while watching the pupils.”

    “If the patient is sensitive to the remedy the pupils of the patient will dilate quite clearly and come to rest in a new position. In certain rare instances the pupils may contract first and then dilate. The remedy that causes the most dilation of the pupil of the pupil is the remedy to which the body is the most susceptible. After allowing the nervous system to settle down for a few minutes, retest the chosen remedy in various potencies. The potency that causes the largest, most stable dilation is the potency to which the body is most reactive. In this way we can use the vital force as a guide in helping to choose a suitable remedy in the proper potency”.

    DAVID LITTLE EXPLAINS HOW TO USE ‘PULSE REFLEXES’ FOR SELECTING SIMILIMUM:

    “While reading the pulse the remedy vial is brought near the subject’s back with a quick swing stopping a few inches away from the patient’s body and the changes in the pulse are recorded. The vial only needs to be in contact with the body for a few seconds but the effect may last for up to 60 seconds. The heart usually responds to the correct remedy with a sudden hesitation, sometimes for up to 1/2 a beat, followed by one loud beat of the heart, and a perceptively new rhythm and volume.”

    “Sometimes the pulse will respond as soon as you pick up the remedy. These effects can be plainly distinguished by auscultation with a stethoscope and can be viewed on a fluoroscope. In cases where there are irregular beats the correct remedy seems to stabilize the pulse and make it more regular. If the heart is arrhythmic because of a serious pathological lesion there is still often a clear response.”

    “The pulse can easily show the homoeopath which remedy the vital force wants in that moment. It will also help show you which potency is the most suitable. Autonomic reflex testing can make a great difference in any homoeopath’s practice, particularly when it is difficult to chose between a few well chosen remedies. It is also useful after several remedies have been used and the symptoms have become masked due to too many partial simillimums”.

    DAVID LITTLE EXPLAINS HOW TO USE ‘RESPIRATORY RESPONSE’ TO SELECT SIMILIMUM AND POTENCY:

    “First of all, observe the rate, rhythm, depth, movement of the chest, and effort in breathing of the client. The normal respiratory rate for a resting adult is 14 to 20 breaths per minute. Infants can breathe up to 44 cycles per minute. After observing the respiration bring the remedy near and touch the patient as in the other testing methods and watch for a response. When a related remedy is brought near the patient will sometimes almost sigh, or take a deep breath, then a new respiratory rate will be established. Look for changes in the rhythm, depth and movement of the chest. Counting the respiration can be done at the same time that the pulse is assessed. These affects can be watched together after one has gained experience in the method. Breath sound changes can be ausculated with a stethoscope much in the same way as the heart sounds. Observation, tactile fremitus, palpation, and percussion also supply information about the state of health of the respiratory system and can be used to assess the actions of related remedies.”

    DAVID LITTLE EXPLAINS ‘PERCUSSION TECHNIQUE’ OF SELECTING SIMILIMUM AND POTENCY:

    “The percussion technique can easily be done by anyone who has experience in the art of percussion for diagnostic purposes although a person can be trained in this method especially for the purpose of testing remedies. In this technique the patient is to be seated facing the west in a chair in the same manner as the previous tests. The experimenter may sit in front of patient toward the left side so that they can percuss the upper and outer section of the person’s chest. They may also stand behind the subject so as to reach over and percuss the subject’s chest from behind. An assistant stands about four or five feet away with the vials of the homoeopathic remedies placed on a table or chair”.

    “The operator then begins to percuss the upper outer area of the apex of the lungs in a steady rhythm where the percussion-note is between flatness and resonance. When the experimenter is ready the assistant picks up a remedy and steps three or four feet away from the rest of the vials and then takes about two seconds to lift the vial upward until they reach the full length of the arm. If the remedy has any relationship to the patient, the percussion tone will become dull once the assistant touches the vial containing the remedy. As the remedy is raised upward the percussion-note may change to a higher pitch or becomes resonant again. Only those remedies which maintain a dull sound no matter how high the vial is held above the body are to be considered for retesting by the other methods for further assessment.”

    “The distance that the remedy “holds” the dull percussion-note is related to its ability to influence the constitution in question. Some of the most active remedies have maintained the reaction at a distances of 75 to 100 feet or more! This imponderable remedy energy passes through walls made of brick, stone, concrete, or plaster without any obstruction. Stearns and his team observed remedy reactions at distances up to 200 feet. The remedy that “holds” the dullness of the percussion-note at the greatest distance is the remedy that will have the greatest influence over the vital force. Although these techniques are not very practical in the clinic it is quite amazing as a demonstration of the sensitivity of the human aura to the energy of a related homoeopathic remedy.”

    DAVID LITTLE EXPLAINS HOW TO USE ‘SKIN RESPONSE” FOR SELECTING SIMILIMUM AND POTENCY:

    “The skin resistance test is another easy to read response of the autonomic nervous system to a correct remedy. It is best if a sitting patient faces west or a prone person lies with the head to the north. The abdomen of the patient should be bared, and if the weather is humid, dried well with a cloth. The operator should then stroke the abdomen with a dielectric rod, such as one made out of glass, rubber, or bakelite. A drinking glass or a 6 oz. remedy bottle works very well. The remedies to be tested should be placed close by and handled by an assistant or the tester. The operator lightly strokes the abdomen in an up and down direction t in order to get a feel of the skin tonus of the patient.

    The assistant or operator now picks up the remedy to be tested and brings it close or in contact with the body while the stroking motion is continued. The operator continues to stroke the abdomen to see if they can observe a “clinging” or “sticky” sensation as the skin is stroked. The dielectric rod will appear to “stick” or feel slightly retarded because of the galvanic skin response. In order to observe the stick effect the rod should be held horizontal to the abdomen and stroked vertically. To start with a single area to the side of, or immediately below the navel should be stroked. All remedies that cause a stick reaction should then be retested by stroking the other areas of the abdomen to see which one causes the largest area of the abdomen to respond. The remedy that shows the largest pattern of reaction will be found to have a strong effect on both the pupil dilation and pulse reflexes. It has also been found that the areas along the spine are also good areas for the testing of the remedies.

    The same technique may be used for testing the remedies on the spine as for the abdomen. Some individuals seem to react better on the back than the front. It is also useful in those men who have too much abdominal hair to get a good response. The remedy that shows the largest area of reaction along the spine is the most suitable. Those individuals who have experience in Osteopathic or Chiropractic methods may notice certain relationships between the reflexes that respond and the areas of the illness treated. This is a phenomenon where research will prove most interesting to those with knowledge of the field. The inside of the arm, especially over the elbow joint, is also another area that responds well to the skin reflex. This area is convenient in situations where it may be impractical to bare the trunk of the body.”

    DAVID LITTLE EXPLAINS HOW TO USE ‘PALPATION’ FOR SELECTING SIMILIMUM AND POTENCY:

    “Palpation is a method of assessing the state of health by means of examination with the hands. The different regions of the body are investigated for heat, cold, unusual growths, swellings, tightness, looseness, and pain by the hands of the examiner. Much of the information acquired during palpation can be used to test remedies much in the same manner as the other reflexes. For example, the tissue can be assessed for areas of tension, relaxation and pain before and after the remedies are brought in contact with the patient. The tight areas of the body become more relaxed and loose areas become more tight. Pain on contact is usually significantly reduced when the correct remedies are in contact with the human electromagnetic field or the body.”

    ” With proper biofeedback equipment the human operator can be removed from the testing altogether and the results analyzed by computers. This area of research is an aspect of modern science where homoeopaths can prove that their remedies have definite physiological results. These biofeedback systems can also be combined with the radionic methods to demonstrate the presence of subtle waves emanating from the human body as well as homoeopathic remedies. This work needs the assistance of those who are experienced in Homoeopathy if it is going to yield the best results. Dr. G. B. Stearns was such a man as he was one of the only Americans to use Boyd’s Emanometer and clinical reflex testing in conjunction with homoeopathy.”

    DAVID LITTLE EXPLAINS THE PREPARING OF LM POTENCY AS FOLLOWS :

    The LM potency is first made from the 3c trituration (1:100x100x100). Next 1 grain of this trituration is placed into 500 drops to make the LM/0 solution (1 to 501 ratio). Then 1 drop is taken from the LM/0 solution and added to 100 drops of dilute and succussed 100 times. This makes the LM 0/1 potency, the first degree of the LM pharmacy (100x100x100x500x100x500 = LM 0/1). The C’s of the 5th Organon (1833) were made with 10 succussions by hand although many modern potencies are made with 10 to 40 or more succussions by machine.

    When speaking of the amount of original medicinal substances in the LM 0/1 it is similar to the amount found in the 6c potency although its remedial powers are greatly expanded due to the larger dilution medium. A mere comparison of the amount of original substances found in the C and LM potency does not show the differences in their inner medicinal qualities. The LM pharmaceutical solution is then used to moisten 500 tiny poppy seed size pellets.

    One pellet of the LM 0/1 is further diluted in a minimum of 3 & 1/2 oz to make the medicinal solution. After succussions 1, 2 or 3 teaspoons are taken from the medicinal solution and further diluted in a dilution glass of water. From this dilution glass 1, 2, 3 teaspoons are given to the patient as a dose. The final liquid dose has been diluted through two more stages than the dry dose. The final amount of original substance given to the patient is more diluted than the dry pill since it has been dissolved in the medicinal solution and stirred into a dilution glass. This final amount of original substance in the teaspoon of solution given to the patient has yet to be calculated in the equation.
    ———————————————————————————————–

    This is the real face of international ‘scientific homeopathy’, and its ‘modern masters’! They write books, conduct courses, seminars and interviews to train new generation of homeopaths. They are ‘most revered’ teachers and gurus. They represent homeopathy in international platforms. Nothing to wonder scientific community dismiss homeopathy as ‘fake’, ‘superstitious beliefs’ and ‘quackery’! No wonder James Randy and his skeptic friends rocking!

  • Similarity Of ‘Functional Groups’ Of Drug Molecules And Pathogenic Molecules Determines ‘Similimum”

    To understand the real science behind the phenomena of ‘similia similibus curentur’, ‘drug proving’ and ‘potntization’, we should study drug substances in terms of not only their ‘constituent molecules’, but in terms of ‘functional groups’ and ‘moieties’ of those drug molecules. A drug substance is composed of diverse types of drug molecules. A drug molecule interacts with ‘active groups’ of biological target molecules such as enzymes and receptors using their ‘functional groups’ or ‘moieties’. It is the ‘functional groups’ and ‘moieties’ on the individual drug molecules that decide to which biological molecules they can bind to and produce molecular inhibitions. Different drug molecules with different size and structures, but having same ‘functional group’ or ‘moiety’ can bind to same biological molecules and produce similar molecular errors and similar groups of symptoms. A drug molecule become similimum to a disease when the drug molecule and disease-producing molecule have same functional groups, so that they could bind to same biological targets producing same molecular errors and same symptom groups.

    Drug molecules act upon the biological molecules in the organism by binding their ‘functional groups’ to the active groups on the complex biological molecules such as receptors and enzymes. These molecular interactions are determined by the affinity between functional groups or moieties of drug molecules and active sites of biological molecules. Here, the functional groups of drug molecules are called ‘ligands’, and the biological molecules are called ‘targets’. Ligand-target interaction is  determined by a peculiar ‘key-lock’ relationship due to complementary configurational affinities.

    It is to be specifically noted that same functional group will undergo the same or similar chemical reactions regardless of the size or configuration of of the molecule it is a part of. However, its relative reactivity can be modified by nearby functional groups known as facilitating groups. That means, different types of drug molecules or pathogenic molecules having same functional groups and facilitating groups can bind to same biological molecules, and produce similar molecular inhibitions and symptoms. Homeopathic principle of ‘similimum’ is well explained by this understanding. If a drug molecule can produce symptoms similar to symptoms of a particular disease, it means that the drug molecules and disease-causing molecules have same functional groups on them, by which they bind to same biological molecules. Obviously, similarity of symptoms means similarity of functional groups of pathogenic molecules and drug molecules. To be similimum, the whole molecules need not be similar, but similarity of functional groups is enough.

    Potentized drugs would contain the molecular imprints of drug molecules, along with molecular imprints of their functional groups. These molecular imprints will have specific configurational affinity towards any molecule having same functional groups, and can bind and deactivate them.

    According to the scientific definition proposed by Dialectical Homeopathy, ‘Similia Similibus Curentur’ means:

    “If a drug substance in crude form is capable of producing certain groups of symptoms in a healthy human organism, that drug substance in potentized form can cure diseases having similar symptoms”.

    Potentization is explained in terms of molecular imprinting. As per this concept, potentized drugs contains diverse types of molecular imprints representing diverse types of constituent molecules contained in the drug substances used for potentization.

    In other words, “potentized drugs can cure diseases having symptoms similar to those produced by that drug in healthy organism if applied in crude forms”.

    Homeopathy is based on the therapeutic principle of ‘similia similibus curentur’, which scientifically means “endogenous or exogenous pathogenic molecules that cause diseases by binding to the biological molecules can be entrapped and removed using molecular imprints of drug molecules which in molecular form can bind to the same biological molecules, utilizing the complementary configurational affinity between molecular imprints and pathogenic molecules”.

    So far, we understood ‘Similia Similibus Curentur’ as ‘similarity of symptoms produced by drugs as well as diseases’. According to modern scientific understanding, we can explain it as ‘similarity of molecular errors produced by drug molecules and pathogenic molecules’ in the organism.

    To be more exact, that means ‘similarity of molecular configurations of pathogenic molecules and drug molecules’. Potentized drugs contains ‘molecular imprints’ of constituent molecules of drug used for potentization. ‘Molecular imprints’ are three-dimensional negatives of molecules, and hence they would have a peculiar affinity towards those molecules, due to their complementary configuration. ‘Molecular imprints’ would show this complementary affinity not only towards the molecules used for imprinting, but also towards all molecules that have configurations similar to those molecules. Homeopathy utilizes this phenomenon, and uses molecular imprints of drug molecules to bind and entrap pathogenic molecules having configurations similar to them. Similarity of configurations of drug molecules and pathogenic molecules are identified by evaluating the ‘similarity of symptoms’ they produce in organism during drug proving and disease. This realization is the the basis of scientific understanding of homeopathy I propose.

    To be ‘similar’ does not mean pathological molecule and drug molecules should  be similar in their ‘whole’ molecular structure. To bind to same targets, similarity of ‘functional groups’ or even a ‘moeity’ is enough. If the adjacent groups that facilitate binding with targets are also same, similarity becomes more perfect. If a drug molecule could produce symptoms similar to a disease, that means the drug molecules contains some functional groups simialr to those of pathogenic molecules that caused the disease. By virtue of these similar functional groups, both pathogenic molecules and drug molecules could bind to same biological targets, producing similar molecular errors and symptoms in the organism.

    Molecular imprints of similar functional groups will also be similar. As such, potentized forms of a drug substance can bind and deactivate the pathogenic molecules having similar functional groups. This is the real molecular mechanism of ‘similia similibus curentur’.

    Except those substances of simple chemical formula belonging to mineral groups, most of the pathogenic agents as well as drug substances consist of complex organic molecules. In the study of chemical interactions involving these organic molecules, understanding the concept of ‘functional groups’ is very important.  ‘Functional groups’ are specific groups of atoms within large organic molecules that are responsible for their characteristic chemical reactions.  Different organic molecules having same functional group will undergo the same or similar chemical reactions regardless of the size of the molecule it is a part of.  However, its relative reactivity can be modified or influenced to an extent by nearby functional groups.

    Even though the word moiety is often used synonymously to “functional group”, according to the IUPAC definition,a moiety is a part of a molecule that may include either whole functional groups or a parts of functional groups as substructures.

    The atoms of functional groups are linked to each other and to the rest of the molecule by covalent bonds. When the group of covalently bound atoms bears a net charge, the group is referred to more properly as a polyatomic ion or a complex ion. Any subgroup of atoms of a compound also may be called a radical, and if a covalent bond is broken homolytically, the resulting fragment radicals are referred as free radicals.

    Organic reactions are facilitated and controlled by the functional groups of the reactants.

    A ‘moeity’ represents discrete non-bonded components. Thus, Na2SO4 would contain 3 moieties (2 Na+ and one SO42-). A “chemical formula moiety” is defined as “formula with each discrete bonded residue or ion shown as a separate moiety”.

    We should learn different types of ‘functional groups’ and ‘moieties’ of constituent molecules of our drug substances, as well as diverse types of pathogenic molecules. We have to study our materia medica from this viewpoint, comparing symptoms of different drug molecules having same functional moieties.  Then we can logically  explain the phenomenon of ‘drug relationships’. We can explain the similarity of drugs belonging to different groups such as ‘calcarea’, ‘merc’, ‘kali’, ‘acid’, ‘sulph’, ‘mur’ etc. Such an approach will make our understanding of homeopathy more scientific and accurate.

    Learn ‘Functional Groups’ from Wikipedia:

    The following is a list of common functional groups. In the formulas, the symbols R and R’ usually denote an attached hydrogen, or a hydrocarbon side chain of any length, but may sometimes refer to any group of atoms.

    Functional Groups containing Hydrocarbons

    Functional groups, called hydrocarbyls, that contain only carbon and hydrogen, but vary in the number and order of π bonds. Each one differs in type (and scope) of reactivity.

    Chemical class

    Group

    Formula

    Structural Formula

    Prefix

    Suffix

    Example

    Alkane

    Alkyl

    RH

    alkyl-

    -ane

    Ethane

    Alkene

    Alkenyl

    R2C=CR2

    alkenyl-

    -ene

    Ethylene
    (Ethene)

    Alkyne

    Alkynyl

    RC≡CR’

    alkynyl-

    -yne

    Acetylene
    (Ethyne)

    Benzene derivative

    Phenyl

    RC6H5
    RPh

    phenyl-

    -benzene

    Cumene
    (2-phenylpropane)

    Toluene derivative

    Benzyl

    RCH2C6H5
    RBn

    benzyl-

    1-(substituent)toluene

    Benzyl bromide
    (α-Bromotoluene)

    There are also a large number of branched or ring alkanes that have specific names, e.g., tert-butyl, bornyl, cyclohexyl, etc.

    Hydrocarbons may form charged structures: positively charged carbocations or negative carbanions. Carbocations are often named -um. Examples are tropylium and triphenylmethyl cations and the cyclopentadienyl anion.

    Functional Groups containing halogens

    Haloalkanes are a class of molecule that is defined by a carbon-halogen bond. This bond can be relatively weak (in the case of an iodoalkane) or quite stable (as in the case of a fluoroalkane). In general, with the exception of fluorinated compounds, haloalkanes readily undergo nucleophilic substitution reactions or elimination reactions. The substitution on the carbon, the acidity of an adjacent proton, the solvent conditions, etc. all can influence the outcome of the reactivity.

    Chemical class

    Group

    Formula

    Structural Formula

    Prefix

    Suffix

    Example

    haloalkane

    halo

    RX

    halo-

    alkyl halide

    Chloroethane
    (Ethyl chloride)

    fluoroalkane

    fluoro

    RF

    fluoro-

    alkyl fluoride

    Fluoromethane
    (Methyl fluoride)

    chloroalkane

    chloro

    RCl

    chloro-

    alkyl chloride

    Chloromethane
    (Methyl chloride)

    bromoalkane

    bromo

    RBr

    bromo-

    alkyl bromide

    Bromomethane
    (Methyl bromide)

    iodoalkane

    iodo

    RI

    iodo-

    alkyl iodide

    Iodomethane
    (Methyl iodide)

    Functional Groups containing oxygen

    Compounds that contain C-O bonds each possess differing reactivity based upon the location and hybridization of the C-O bond, owing to the electron-withdrawing effect of sp hybridized oxygen (carbonyl groups) and the donating effects of sp2 hybridized oxygen (alcohol groups).

    Chemical class

    Group

    Formula

    Structural Formula

    Prefix

    Suffix

    Example

    Alcohol

    Hydroxyl

    ROH

    hydroxy-

    -ol

    Methanol

    Ketone

    Carbonyl

    RCOR’

    -oyl- (-COR’)
    or
    oxo- (=O)

    -one

    Butanone
    (Methyl ethyl ketone

    Aldehyde

    Aldehyde

    RCHO

    formyl- (-COH)
    or
    oxo- (=O)

    -al

    Ethanal
    (Acetaldehyde)

    Acyl halide

    Haloformyl

    RCOX

    carbonofluoridoyl-
    carbonochloridoyl-
    carbonobromidoyl-
    carbonoiodidoyl-

    -oyl halide

    Acetyl chloride
    (Ethanoyl chloride)

    Carbonate

    Carbonate ester

    ROCOOR

    (alkoxycarbonyl)oxy-

    alkyl carbonate

    Triphosgene
    (Di(trichloromethyl) carbonate)

    Carboxylate

    Carboxylate

    RCOO

    carboxy-

    -oate

    Sodium acetate
    (Sodium ethanoate)

    Carboxylic acid

    Carboxyl

    RCOOH

    carboxy-

    -oic acid

    Acetic acid
    (Ethanoic acid)

    Ester

    Ester

    RCOOR’

    alkanoyloxy-
    or
    alkoxycarbonyl

    alkyl alkanoate

    Ethyl butyrate
    (Ethyl butanoate)

    Hydroperoxide

    Hydroperoxy

    ROOH

    hydroperoxy-

    alkylhydroperoxide

    Methyl ethyl ketone peroxide

    Peroxide

    Peroxy

    ROOR

    peroxy-

    alkyl peroxide

    Di-tert-butyl peroxide

    Ether

    Ether

    ROR’

    alkoxy-

    alkyl ether

    Diethyl ether
    (Ethoxyethane)

    Hemiacetal

    Hemiacetal

    RCH(OR’)(OH)

    alkoxy -ol

    -al alkylhemiacetal

    Hemiketal

    Hemiketal

    RC(ORʺ)(OH)R’

    alkoxy -ol

    -one alkylhemiketal

    Acetal

    Acetal

    RCH(OR’)(OR”)

    dialkoxy-

    -al dialkyl acetal

    Ketal (orAcetal)

    Ketal (orAcetal)

    RC(ORʺ)(OR‴)R’

    dialkoxy-

    -one dialkyl ketal

    Orthoester

    Orthoester

    RC(OR’)(ORʺ)(OR‴)

    trialkoxy-

    Orthocarbonate ester

    Orthocarbonate ester

    C(OR)(OR’)(ORʺ)(OR″)

    tetralkoxy-

    tetraalkylorthocarbonate

    Functional Groups containing nitrogen

    Compounds that contain nitrogen in this category may contain C-O bonds, such as in the case of amides.

    Chemical class

    Group

    Formula

    Structural Formula

    Prefix

    Suffix

    Example

    Amide

    Carboxamide

    RCONR2

    carboxamido-
    or
    carbamoyl-

    -amide

    Acetamide
    (Ethanamide)

    Amines

    Primary amine

    RNH2

    amino-

    -amine

    Methylamine
    (Methanamine)

    Secondary amine

    R2NH

    amino-

    -amine

    Dimethylamine

    Tertiary amine

    R3N

    amino-

    -amine

    Trimethylamine

    4° ammonium ion

    R4N+

    ammonio-

    -ammonium

    Choline

    Imine

    Primary ketimine

    RC(=NH)R’

    imino-

    -imine

    Secondary ketimine

    RC(=NR)R’

    imino-

    -imine

    Primary aldimine

    RC(=NH)H

    imino-

    -imine

    Secondary aldimine

    RC(=NR’)H

    imino-

    -imine

    Imide

    Imide

    (RCO)2NR’

    imido-

    -imide

    Azide

    Azide

    RN3

    azido-

    alkyl azide

    Phenyl azide (Azidobenzene)

    Azo compound

    Azo
    (Diimide)

    RN2R’

    azo-

    -diazene

    Methyl orange
    (p-dimethylamino-azobenzenesulfonic acid)

    Cyanates

    Cyanate

    ROCN

    cyanato-

    alkyl cyanate

    Methyl cyanate

    Isocyanate

    RNCO

    isocyanato-

    alkyl isocyanate

    Methyl isocyanate

    Nitrate

    Nitrate

    RONO2

    nitrooxy-, nitroxy-

    alkyl nitrate

    Amyl nitrate
    (1-nitrooxypentane)

    Nitrile

    Nitrile

    RCN

    cyano-

    alkanenitrile
    alkyl cyanide

    Benzonitrile
    (Phenyl cyanide)

    Isonitrile

    RNC

    isocyano-

    alkaneisonitrile
    alkyl isocyanide

    Methyl isocyanide

    Nitrite

    Nitrosooxy

    RONO

    nitrosooxy-

    alkyl nitrite

    Isoamyl nitrite
    (3-methyl-1-nitrosooxybutane)

    Nitro compound

    Nitro

    RNO2

    nitro-

    Nitromethane

    Nitroso compound

    Nitroso

    RNO

    nitroso-

    Nitrosobenzene

    Pyridine derivative

    Pyridyl

    RC5H4N

    4-pyridyl
    (pyridin-4-yl)

    3-pyridyl
    (pyridin-3-yl)

    2-pyridyl
    (pyridin-2-yl)

    -pyridine

    Nicotine

    Functional Groups containing sulphur

    Compounds that contain sulfur exhibit unique chemistry due to their ability to form more bonds than oxygen, their lighter analogue on the periodic table. Substitutive nomenclature (marked as prefix in table) is preferred over functional class nomenclature (marked as suffix in table) for sulfides, disulfides, sulfoxides and sulfones.

    Chemical class

    Group

    Formula

    Structural Formula

    Prefix

    Suffix

    Example

    Thiol

    Sulfhydryl

    RSH

    sulfanyl-
    (-SH)

    thiol

    Ethanethiol

    Sulfide
    (Thioether)

    Sulfide

    RSR’

    substituent sulfanyl-
    (-SR’)

    di(substituentsulfide

    (Methylsulfanyl)methane (prefix) or
    Dimethyl sulfide (suffix)

    Disulfide

    Disulfide

    RSSR’

    substituent disulfanyl-
    (-SSR’)

    di(substituentdisulfide

    (Methyldisulfanyl)methane (prefix) or
    Dimethyl disulfide (suffix)

    Sulfoxide

    Sulfinyl

    RSOR’

    -sulfinyl-
    (-SOR’)

    di(substituentsulfoxide

    (Methanesulfinyl)methane (prefix) or
    Dimethyl sulfoxide (suffix)

    Sulfone

    Sulfonyl

    RSO2R’

    -sulfonyl-
    (-SO2R’)

    di(substituentsulfone

    (Methanesulfonyl)methane (prefix) or
    Dimethyl sulfone (suffix)

    Sulfinic acid

    Sulfino

    RSO2H

    sulfino-
    (-SO2H)

    sulfinic acid

    2-Aminoethanesulfinic acid

    Sulfonic acid

    Sulfo

    RSO3H

    sulfo-
    (-SO3H)

    sulfonic acid

    Benzenesulfonic acid

    Thiocyanate

    Thiocyanate

    RSCN

    thiocyanato-
    (-SCN)

    substituent thiocyanate

    Phenyl thiocyanate

    Isothiocyanate

    RNCS

    isothiocyanato-
    (-NCS)

    substituent isothiocyanate

    Allyl isothiocyanate

    Thione

    Carbonothioyl

    RCSR’

    -thioyl-
    (-CSR’)
    or
    sulfanylidene-
    (=S)

    thione

    Diphenylmethanethione
    (Thiobenzophenone)

    Thial

    Carbonothioyl

    RCSH

    methanethioyl-
    (-CSH)
    or
    sulfanylidene-
    (=S)

    thial

    Groups containing phosphorus

    Compounds that contain phosphorus exhibit unique chemistry due to their ability to form more bonds than nitrogen, their lighter analogues on the periodic table.

    Chemical class

    Group

    Formula

    Structural Formula

    Prefix

    Suffix

    Example

    Phosphine
    (Phosphane)

    Phosphino

    R3P

    phosphanyl-

    -phosphane

    Methylpropylphosphane

    Phosphonic acid

    Phosphono

    RP(=O)(OH)2

    phosphono-

    substituent phosphonic acid

    Benzylphosphonic acid

    Phosphate

    Phosphate

    ROP(=O)(OH)2

    phosphonooxy-
    or
    O-phosphono- (phospho-)

    substituent phosphate

    Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (suffix)

    O-Phosphonocholine (prefix)
    (Phosphocholine)

    Phosphodiester

    Phosphate

    HOPO(OR)2

    [(alkoxy)hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-
    or
    O-[(alkoxy)hydroxyphosphoryl]-

    di(substituent) hydrogen phosphate
    or
    phosphoric acid di(substituentester

    DNA

    O‑[(2‑Guanidinoethoxy)hydroxyphosphoryl]‑l‑serine (prefix)
    (Lombricine)

  • Vijaykar’s ‘Theories’ on ‘Embryonic Layers’ and ‘Hering Laws of Directions of Cure’

    David Witko, in his book review published in ‘The Homoeopath’,The Society of Homoeopaths.2 Artizan Road,NorthamptonNN1 4HU,United Kingdom, on ‘Predictive Homeopathy Part One – Theory of Suppression’ by Dr Prafull Vijayakar, said as follows :

    “Essentially, and in outline, he charts the development of the human embryo in seven stages, from the cells and mind to the neural plate, neuro-endocrine system, mesoderm, connective tissues, endoderm, and its eventual cornpletion at the ectoderm”

    “All of the organs of the body derive from these seven layers of development. To illustrate, the GI tract is formed as part of the endoderm, whilst the kidneys were formed earlier in the mesoderm”

    “Vijayakar reasons that as natural embryonic growth progresses from the inside to the outside (even our bones develop this way), disease and ill-health will inevitably move in the reverse direction, i.e. from the outside (in Hering-speak) to the inside.  From the ectoderm to the endoderm. From the endoderm to the mesoderm. Deeper and deeper. So if you know which parts of the body are associated with each level you can clearly see the progression of disease”.

    This review of David Witko amply illustrates the essence of Vijaykar’s theory of ‘embryonic layers’ relating with hering’s law, on which his whole ‘methods’ and systems’ are built up on.

    Which text book of embryology says about the development of human embryo starting from “cells and mind”? Is it vijaykar’s invention? Embryology never deals with ‘mind’, but only ‘cells’.

    Obviously, vijaykar wanted to make a theory seemingly scientific utilizing some concepts borrowed from genetics, but same time he wanted to establish that ‘mind’ is primary in the development of embryo. Hence, he added the word ‘mind’ along with ‘cells’ while describing the initial stages of embryonic development.

    According to his interpretation of ‘embryology’, development of human embryo ‘starts’ from ‘cells and mind’, then advances “to the neural plate, neuro-endocrine system, mesoderm, connective tissues, endoderm, and its eventual completion at the ectoderm”.

    Read from Wikipedia on EMBRYONIC LAYERS:

    “The gastrula with its blastopore soon develops three distinct layers of cells (the germ layers) from which all the bodily organs and tissues then develop:
    the innermost layer, or endoderm, gives rise to the digestive organs, lungs and bladder; the middle layer, or mesoderm, gives rise to the muscles, skeleton and blood system; the outer layer of cells, or ectoderm, gives rise to the nervous system and skin”

    ‎”A germ layer, occasionally referred to as a germinal epithelium, is a group of cells, formed during animal embryogenesis. Germ layers are particularly pronounced in the vertebrates; however, all animals more complex than sponges (eumetazoans and agnotozoans) produce two or three primary tissue layers (sometimes called primary germ layers). Animals with radial symmetry, like cnidarians, produce two germ layers (the ectoderm and endoderm) making them diploblastic. Animals with bilateral symmetry produce a third layer between these two layers (appropriately called the mesoderm) making them triploblastic. Germ layers eventually give rise to all of an animal’s tissues and organs through the process of organogenesis”

    ‎”The endoderm is one of the germ layers formed during animal embryogenesis. Cells migrating inward along the archenteron form the inner layer of the gastrula, which develops into the endoderm.

    The endoderm consists at first of flattened cells, which subsequently become columnar. It forms the epithelial lining of the whole of the digestive tube except part of the mouth and pharynx and the terminal part of the rectum (which are lined by involutions of the ectoderm). It also forms the lining cells of all the glands which open into the digestive tube, including those of the liver and pancreas; the epithelium of the auditory tube and tympanic cavity; the trachea, bronchi, and air cells of the lungs; the urinary bladder and part of the urethra; and the follicle lining of the thyroid gland and thymus.

    The endoderm forms: the stomach, the colon, the liver, the pancreas, the urinary bladder, the lining of the urethra, the epithelial parts of trachea, the lungs, the pharynx, the thyroid, the parathyroid, and the intestines.”

    ‎”The mesoderm germ layer forms in the embryos of triploblastic animals. During gastrulation, some of the cells migrating inward contribute to the mesoderm, an additional layer between the endoderm and the ectoderm.

    The formation of a mesoderm led to the development of a coelom. Organs formed inside a coelom can freely move, grow, and develop independently of the body wall while fluid cushions and protects them from shocks.
    The mesoderm forms: skeletal muscle, the skeleton, the dermis of skin, connective tissue, the urogenital system, the heart, blood (lymph cells), the kidney, and the spleen.”

    ‎”The ectoderm is the start of a tissue that covers the body surfaces. It emerges first and forms from the outermost of the germ layers.

    The ectoderm forms: the central nervous system, the lens of the eye, cranial and sensory, the ganglia and nerves, pigment cells, head connective tissues, the epidermis, hair, and mammary glands.

    Because of its great importance, the neural crest is sometimes considered a fourth germ layer. It is, however, derived from the ectoderm”

    “The “ectoderm” is one of the three primary germ cell layers in the very early embryo. The other two layers are the mesoderm (middle layer) and endoderm (inside layer), with the ectoderm as the most exterior layer. It emerges first and forms from the outer layer of germ cells. Generally speaking, the ectoderm differentiates to form the nervous system (spine, peripheral nerves and brain), tooth enamel and the epidermis (the outer part of integument). It also forms the lining of mouth, anus, nostrils, sweat glands, hair and nails”.

    ”In vertebrates, the ectoderm has three parts: external ectoderm (also known as surface ectoderm), the neural crest, and neural tube. The latter two are known as neuroectoderm.””

    Please note this point: The fertilized ovum “develops three distinct layers of cells (the germ layers) from which all the bodily organs and tissues then develop: the innermost layer, or endoderm, gives rise to the digestive organs, lungs and bladder; the middle layer, or mesoderm, gives rise to the muscles, skeleton and blood system; the outer layer of cells, or ectoderm, gives rise to the nervous system and skin”

    It is obvious that brain and nervous system develops from ‘ectoderm’ layer. It is the ‘outermost’ layer of embryo, not ‘innermost’. The theory of vijaykar that ‘brain and mind’ belongs to innermost embryonic layer is pure nonsense. They develop from ‘outermost’ embryonic layer called ‘ectoderm’, from which organs such as skin and hair also develops.  His theory that embryonic development ‘starts’ with ‘mind’ and ‘ends’ with ‘ectoderm’ has nothing to do with embryology, except that he plays with some terms used in embryology.

    David Witko says: “Vijayakar reasons that as natural embryonic growth progresses from the inside to the outside, disease and ill-health will inevitably move in the reverse direction, i.e. from the outside to the inside”.

    This is the most fundamental ‘reasoning’ of vijaykar, which he utilizes to build a common ground with ‘hering laws regarding directions of cure’ on which his whole ‘theoretical system is built upon.

    We already saw that the concept ‘direction of embryonic development’ on which his ‘reasoning’ is itself totally baseless. Embryonic development does not start from ‘inner’ organs of endoderm and ‘complete’ with ‘outer’ organs of ectoderm’ as vijaykar tries to establish.

    Even if the direction of ‘embryonic development’ was from ‘inner layer to outer layer’, what is the logic behind his ‘reasoning’ that ‘disease and ill-health will inevitably move in the reverse direction, i.e. from the outside to the inside”?

    Most funny thing regarding this ‘reasoning’ is that it goes against the fundamental concept of disease accepted by ‘classical homeopathy’ that ‘diseases originate in the level of vital force’. Vijaykar says ‘direction od disease is from ‘outermost layer’ to ‘innermost layer’. Should we understand that ‘vital force’ belongs to ‘outermost’ layer of organism according to the interpretation of Vijayakar? Both cannot be right by any way. Either vijaykar should say that diseases originate in ‘vital force’ which is the ‘innermost layer’, or he should say disease start in the ‘outermost’ layer, that is skin and hair.

    Since vijaykar has gone totally wrong and self contradicting in his understanding of embryonic layers and ‘direction of embryonic development’, his explanation of ‘hering law’ based on his ‘reasoning’ is pure nonsense.

    ‘Curative processes happen in a direction just reverse to disease processes’- that is the sum total of Hering’s observations regarding ‘directions of cure’.

    The four ‘laws’ now known as ‘herings laws’ are actually the working examples he used to demonstrate this fundamental observation.

    It was the later ‘interpreters’ who actually converted these four ‘working’ examples into ‘fundamental laws’ of homeopathic cure. They understood and applied these ‘laws’ in a mechanical way. They taught homeopaths to consider ‘hering laws’ regarding ‘directions of cure’ as one of the ‘fundamental laws’ of homeopathy, similar to ‘similia similibus curentur’. They made homeopaths believe that drug effects that do not agree with these ‘laws’ cannot be considered ‘curative’, and are ‘suppressive’. There are some modern streams of homeopathic practice which rely more upon ‘hering laws’ than ‘similia similibu curentur’ in their methods of therapeutic applications.

    Actually, Hahnemann did not seriously work upon those aspects of curative processes which we call ‘directions of cure’, or considered it a decisive factor in homeopathic therapeutics. He was more concerned about ‘misms’ in the management of ‘chronic diseases’, where as Hering did not consider ‘miasms’ at all.

    Some modern ‘theoreticians’ have come with new theories by combining ‘hering laws’ and theory of miasms, also mixing up with terms of ‘genetics’ and ‘embryology’ which they propagate as the ‘only’ correct understanding of homeopathy

    Following are the four working ‘examples’ hering used to demonstrate his observation that ‘Curative processes happen in a direction just reverse to disease processes’, and later considered as ‘Hering laws of direction of cure’:

    In a genuine curative process,

    1. Symptoms should disappear in the reverse chronological order of their appearance in disease.
    2. Symptoms should travel from internal parts of body to external parts
    3. Symptoms should travel from more vital organs to less vital organs.
    4. Symptoms should travel from ‘upper’ parts of the body to ‘lower’ parts.

    According to those who consider these as the ‘fundamental law of cure’, any drug effect that happen not in accordance with above laws are ‘suppressive’, and hence not ‘curative’.

    ‘Disease processes and curative processes always happen in reverse directions’ is the fundamental observation hering actually tried to establish regarding ‘directions of disease and cure’.

    According to hering’s observation, natural disease processes always advances from lower parts of the body to upper parts, from less vital to more vital organs and from external to internal organs. More over, all these disease processes advance in a chronological order.

    Logically, Hering’s observations only mean that “all genuine ‘curative processes’ should happen in a direction just reverse to disease processes”.

    Over-extending and mechanical application of ‘herings laws’ without understanding their exact premises and scientific meaning may lead to grave errors regarding interpretation of curative processes and drug effects.

    This phenomenon could be explained in the light of modern scientific understanding of ‘cascading of pathological molecular inhibitions’ and complex dynamics of ‘bio-molecular feed back mechanisms’.

    To understand this explanation, one has to equip himself with at least a working knowledge regarding the concepts of modern biochemistry regarding the bio-molecular inhibitions involved in pathology and therapeutics.

    Except those diseases which are purely due to errors in genetic substances, and those diseases which are due to genuine deficiency of building materials of biological molecules, all other diseases are considered to be caused by ‘molecular inhibitions’. Pathogenic molecules of endogenous or exogenous origin bind to some biological molecules in the organism, causing ‘molecular inhibitions’ which lead to pathological derangement in associated biochemical pathways. These pathogenic molecules may be of infectious, environmental, nutritional, metabolic, drug-induced, miasmatic or any other origin. Derangements in biochemical pathways are expressed through diverse groups of subjective and objective symptoms. This is the fundamental biochemistry of pathology.

    Molecular inhibitions happening in a biological molecule due to the binding of a pathogenic molecule initiates a complex process of ‘cascading of molecular errors’ and ‘bio-feedback mechanisms’ in the organism. Errors happening in a particular biochemical pathway leads to errors in another pathway which is dependant on the first pathway for regular supply of metabolites, which further lead to errors in another pathway. This ‘cascading of molecular errors’ happens through successive stages, which is expressed through new subjective and objective symptoms. This ‘cascading’ is behind what we call ‘advancing of disease’ into new systems and organs, exhibiting ever new groups of associated symptoms. For an observer, this cascading appears in the form of ‘traveling of disease’ from one system into another. Along with these ‘cascading’ of molecular errors, there happens a series of activation and shutting down of complex ‘bio-molecular feedback’ mechanisms also. The phenomenon of ‘advancing of diseases’ should be studied in this scientific perspective of modern biochemistry.

    When a molecular inhibition happens in some biological molecule ‘A’ due to binding of a pathogenic molecule ‘a’, it actually stops or decreases some essential molecular conversions that are essential part of a complex biochemical pathway P.  If ‘G’ is the normal ligand of ‘A’, and ‘g’ is the product of biochemical interaction involving ‘A’, the result of this molecular inhibition is that ‘G’ accumulates on one side, and ‘g’ is not available for the next stage of molecular processes. Accumulating ‘P’ may induce a feedback mechanism leading to reduction or stoppage its production itself, or may move to other parts of organism and bind to unwanted molecular targets, initiation a new stream of pathological derangement.

    Obviously, ‘traveling’ of disease or ‘advancing’ of disease happens through cascading of molecular errors in various biochemical pathways. Some disease processes may ‘travel’ from ‘external’ to internal organs, some from ‘lower parts’ to upper parts, some from ‘less vital’ parts to ‘more vital’ parts. All these ‘traveling’ is basically decided by the involved biochemical pathways. It would be wrong to generalize these observations in such a way that ‘all diseases travel from exterior to interior, lower parts to higher parts,  and less vital to more vital parts’. It is also wrong to generalize in such a way that ‘curative process always travel from interior to exterior, above downwards, and from vital to less vital parts’. This is mechanical understanding and application of hering’s observations.

    Actually, curative processes happens in a direction opposite to the direction of disease process. That depends upon the biochemical pathways involved and the exact dynamics of cascading of molecular inhibitions. Its dynamics is very complex, and should not be interpreted and applied in a mechanistic way. When ‘molecular inhibitions’ underlying the disease processes are systematically removed using molecular imprints, the curative process also would take place in the reverse direction of disease processes.

    To sum up, Hering’s observations regarding a ‘directions of disease and cure’ is a valuable one, but it should be studied in the light of modern biochemistry.

    Curative processes happen in a direction just reverse to disease processes”- that is the sum total of Hering’s observations regarding ‘directions of cure’.

    Vijaykar totally failed to comprehend the biochemistry involved in homeopathic therapeutics, and hence could not interpret the ‘directions of disease and cure’ in relation with the interactions of biochemical pathways. In the absence of essential scientific knowledge, he only tried to make his theories appear ‘scientific’ by utilizing some terms from embryology and genetics.  Playing with scientific vocabulary, he was successful in marketing his theories well among the ‘science-starved’ sections of homeopathic community.