Use Of ‘Sarcodes’ In Homeopathy Is Different From ‘Organotherapy’ in Traditional Medicine
Some people think that “ordganotherapy” practiced by certain traditional healers and occult practitioners are equivalent to the use of “sarcodes” in homeopathy. It is totally wrong.
This morning, my new friend from CANADA, Dr Hardev Singh Billing asked me as follows:
“Organotherapy ( sarcodes) very popular in France and Belgium..as well as in Canada very positive results in 4 CH Potency.
Organotherapy or mRNA is to regulate and correct the function of organs and bodily systems on a cellular level (mRNA stands for messenger ribonucleic acid, which mediates the transfer of genetic information from the cell nucleus to ribosomes in the cytoplasm, where it serves as a template for protein synthesis). Organotherapy is postulated to stimulate organ functions, depending on the tissues and related mRNA used.
In cases where organs are damaged due to autoimmune issues, organotherapy substitutes for the organ and accepts the autoimmune antibodies, leaving the organ to stimulate its own restoration….”
I think I have to take this question seriously.
What is known as “Organotherapy” is a technique that makes use of extracts derived from animal or human tissues to treat medical conditions.It is an ancient practice to treat a disease related with a particular organ using an organ with the same organ from another creature. This custom was familiar to the Ancient Indians, Greeks, Romans and many other civilizations. For example, consuming brain tissue was considered a potential treatment for those of low intellect, eating testicles of bulls or stallions to treat impotency in men, cooked ovaries of goats to treat infertility in women, cooked joints of goats to treating joint defects etc. These customs are even practiced by certain traditional healers in India.
Scientific studies have to be done to verify whether “organ therapy” works or not, and if it works, to explain how it works. When consuming organs in cooked or uncooked form, they will be digested and the constituent molecules undergoing various chemical conversions and getting absorbed into the body. Mostly, they will act by supplying essential nutrients to the body. Of course, they will contain some chemical molecules that are specific to the particular organs, and hence, they will have their specific biological actions of their own.
SARCODES used in homeopathy are also derived from body tissues. But homeopathy does not use them as organ-specifics. Instead, they are “proved” by administering in healthy individuals, symptoms collected, and materia medica prepared. Then these sarcodes or tissue products are “potentized” according to homeopathic method. These potentized drugs are used by comparing its materia medica symptoms with the disease symptoms expressed by the particular patient, in the same way as any other potentized drugs. It is obvious that use of SARCODES in homeopathy is entirely different from use of ORGANOTHERAPY in ancient medicine.
According to MIT view, the tissue products used as SARCODES contain diverse types of biological ligands that play specific roles in biological processes. Biological ligands act by binding to various types of specific biological targets, and modulating their normal actions. Biological ligands are very important in maintaining the normal vital processes.
When some exogenous or endogenous molecules have FUNCTIONAL GROUPS similar to those of the biological ligands, those molecules can mimic as the biological ligands and bind to their natural targets, thereby inhibiting the actions of the biological molecules such as enzymes, receptors, transport molecules etc. This situation leads to DISEASE.
When we potentize SARCODES, the biological ligand contained in them are removed, and only their MOLECULAR IMPRINTS remain. When we administer potentized sarcodes in a body, we are actually introducing the molecular imprints of biological ligands. If the pathogenic molecules that have produced inhibitions in biological molecules have functional groups similar to the ligand molecules in the SARCODES we have used to prepare molecular imprints, there will be a ‘conformational affinity’ between the pathogenic molecules and the molecular imprints we introduced. Molecular imprints can bind to the pathogenic molecules due to this conformational affinity, thereby removing the pathological inhibitions of biological molecules. This leads to CURE.
Hope I have scientifically explained the actions of SARCODES, and the difference between SARCODES and ORGANOTHERAPY.
I am thankful to my friend Dr Hardev Singh Billing from Canada, who prompted me to write this note by asking me such a question this morning.